gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
I believe this could be a chink in the armor. Not the armor ban law but for gun rights in general. I can see this trickling down to stuff like suppressors and all the other NFA stuff.
NYSRPA v. Bruen, NY 2A Case Supreme Court case and decision
- Thread starter ManualF150
- Start date
Bigfoot
.450/400 Nitro Ex
FUKH is unhinged. LOL
She's way overreacting and looking like an ass.
She's way overreacting and looking like an ass.
BerettaGuy
.308 Win
For us old farts in Erie County. Judge Penny Wolfgang would issue permits without restrictions because she knew restructions were unconstitutional. But she still issued permits which were arbitrary and capricious and unconstitutional.
maverick52
.223 Rem
Called my permit office. They have a recorded message saying that they are awaiting guidance from the NYSP. I am curious to see how it effects current permits. I assume that administrative restrictions will be lifted to current permit holders.
BerettaGuy
.308 Win
It's what the left does.
Only YOU are expected to obey!
Hi all. Just got approved for this account and wanted to post on this subject I was reading on. Let me share 3 things.
1. To me it sounds like the "can be revoked at any time" is a thing of the past now for NY permits.
2. In his opinion Thomas stated New York couldn’t declare Manhattan a sensitive area simply because it was crowded, so I’m thinking just saying an area is crowded won’t work as a restriction.
3. This decision also eliminates the "two-step" approach lower courts have used to rule on gun cases. They now must rule only on Text, Tradition and History when it comes to the Second Amendment.
1. To me it sounds like the "can be revoked at any time" is a thing of the past now for NY permits.
2. In his opinion Thomas stated New York couldn’t declare Manhattan a sensitive area simply because it was crowded, so I’m thinking just saying an area is crowded won’t work as a restriction.
3. This decision also eliminates the "two-step" approach lower courts have used to rule on gun cases. They now must rule only on Text, Tradition and History when it comes to the Second Amendment.
4WHLDRFTN
6.5 Creedmoor
and theres the problem
skywarner
9mm
If FUKH and NYS feel so strongly about the SCOTUS decision, it’s governmental leadership is free to resign en masse or call for outright secession. Otherwise, they need to accept the ruling.
maverick52
.223 Rem
In their eyes the court is illegitimate. So they will do all they can. Even if it gets tied up in court, they will do it.
pshift
.338 Win Mag
Here is a web page from the Crying News Network. Let the festivities begin!!! 
www.cnn.com
Live updates: Supreme Court strikes down New York's handgun law
The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York gun law that places restrictions on carrying a concealed gun outside the home. Follow here for live news updates, reactions and analysis.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Now begin?
Onegunnotenough
.40 S&W
Wow,even zBiden chimed in.
Do they know 42 states already do this?
How dumb are they??
They are trying to create panic.
Maybe they will be happy when thier people on payroll burn the city down God forbid.
Do they know 42 states already do this?
How dumb are they??
They are trying to create panic.
Maybe they will be happy when thier people on payroll burn the city down God forbid.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
She will do everything but go after the criminals and keep them in prison. Cunt.
I'm a little late to this party, but my understanding is that these permits, which are essentially asking the government for permission to exercise a Right, are unConstitutional. Both because of today's decision, but also the decision in Heller that citizens can purchase and possess arms for defense.
I'm sure the State will argue against it, but all of these permission schemes they created are all in violation of the 2nd Amendment. The pistol permits, the new semi-auto permits, the neutering of various firearms. Hell, this decision today essentially eliminates NFA requirements. You should not have to beg permission for full-auto or silencers.
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Then Kunty Whorecul should be immediately removed from office.
maverick52
.223 Rem
Jochul- "“We are not powerless in this situation. We’re not going to cede our rights that easily despite the best efforts of the politicized Supreme Court of the United States of America,” Hochul said. “This is New York. We don’t back down. We fight back.”
Absolutely zero respect for the rule of law or constitution.
Absolutely zero respect for the rule of law or constitution.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
At a minimum...
No? I would beg to differ.
I think you misspelled hanged for treason.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Yes you cunt. I am not going to cede my rights. I won't back down and I will fight back. That's why I love the constitution and the 2nd amendment.
That damn constitution gets in the way of all their fun.
That's ok. I'm basically going to ignore them.
Publicly declaring you are going to infringe on the Constitution should be impeachable offenses.
FUKH, FUCS, all of them need to be removed from office.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Just told my wife we aren't moving now, we're staying.
Yeah, right. Heading to TN July 5th for a week to visit my son and start scouting out my new life.
Yeah, right. Heading to TN July 5th for a week to visit my son and start scouting out my new life.
You mean like a permit to own a semi auto long gun?
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
I'm fine with the cunt having a musket.
camper4lyfe
.308 Win
It says that permits are still ok, but having to prove a need, above and beyond self defense, is unconstitutional
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
The fact that Hochul is thinking of calling a special session to counter this ruling and try to put more restrictions in place shows just how tyrannical nys government is. Rather than reflecting on the subject and looking for ways to comply with the ruling, they immediately go to try and find ways to get around the ruling to stick it to gun owners. She should be impeached for even suggesting the idea.
It shows a complete lack of respect for the judiciary, our founding documents and our country as a whole. It's treasonous if you ask me.
It shows a complete lack of respect for the judiciary, our founding documents and our country as a whole. It's treasonous if you ask me.
Last edited: