atc250r
.45 acp
FUKH.
NYSRPA v. Bruen, NY 2A Case Supreme Court case and decision
- Thread starter ManualF150
- Start date
OK, Hochul passes new law. If you have parking ticket in the last 20 years you can't be trusted to own any firearm. Then it takes 100 years to make it anywhere.
gunpoliticsny
6.5 Creedmoor
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
That goes against the history and tradition of firearm ownership in this country. Also goes against the history of the founders restricting dangerous persons from having arms. How are you going to argue a parking ticket makes you a dangerous person? None of the other states take that stance anyhow so its not in the tradition of the country. Also remember the ruling specified that you do not need to qualify to the government to use your 2A just like you do not need to qualify to use any other rights. You cannot treat it as a second class right any longer.
That_FNG
6.5 Creedmoor
Now is the time to push for more. Instead of resting on this victory the pro 2A lawyers need to push further. When the left wins a victory they don’t stop and pause and rest. Neither should the pro 2A crowd
It doesn't have to make sense. They are going to throw shit at the wall and see what sticks.
Edit: I am also of the mindset if you have paid your debt to society, your rights are restored. If you can't be trusted you shouldn't be apart of society.
Won't stick. The lower courts have their orders. No scrutiny may be applied.
The New York gun law struck down on Thursday is still in force — for now. (Published 2022)
The case will be sent back to a lower court — the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit — which is expected to send it back to Federal District Court in New York, a legal expert said.
Then why is SAFE Act a thing still?
Deplorable Me
.577 Tyrannosaur.
LOL and the left calls anyone not them a Nazi.
maverick52
.223 Rem
Its free to read that article. Not all articles have a paywall
camper4lyfe
.308 Win
Because they used intermediate scrutiny when deciding that case. SCOTUS just said it must now be strict scrutiny.
Because this ruling came out today.
It basically explains the court allows time before it goes into force.
Just finished fudd busters live reading and it sounds like there could be a strong push against nfa items
Not just strict scrutiny. But more importantly "text history and tradition"
So when was the last time NYS applied Heller to ARs, AKs and 30 rd mags?
Be hard to argue those are in common use.
they didn't have to. they we're allowed to use scrutiny. if the case goes before the courts again they will not be. new rules and orders are now in place.
camper4lyfe
.308 Win
Hard to be in common use when they're NFA items. I'll bet a good lawyer could argue that they WOULD be in common use if they weren't. Who knows, though. I'm not a lawyer.
I like it. Hope so.
The point being they aren't in common use because they have been regulated outside the context of text history and tradition
Not only that.. even in the past 5 years to try and say that something like a suppressor is not in common use, good luck with that
Especially if something like stun guns were deemed common use
I bet NYS ignores, just like last time.
So who is going to challenge that 30 round mags aren't in common use now? Must be tens of millions of them floating around out there. The history? Been around for 50 - 60 years. I can't possibly see how these things can still be upheld. Isn't a magazine case still pending somewhere? I would love to see all of the dominos fall.
NYS won't rule on their own case. It will go to the federal appeals courts, who were just given their orders from their daddy.
Bingo.
Join FPC - Win a Shadow Systems DR920 Elite!
This is just a sample of what ready to go in the 9th:
Rhode v. Becerra (Ammo Sales only through FFL) - Stayed Pending Duncun (9th Circuit)
Duncan V Bonta - (10+ Magazine ban) - Distributed for Conference and petitioned to be held until NYSRPA.
Miller v. Bonta (Assault Weapon Ban): Held for Rupp (9th Circuit)
Rupp v Becerra (Assault Weapon Ban): Held for NYSRPA