Trump backs bill to ban flag-burning: ‘A no brainer!’

Doc8404

Doc8404

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
13,438
Reaction score
23,907
Location
Oneida County NY
Curmudgeon said:
I think what @Darth is saying, in his way, is that this country was founded primarily on the value of individual liberty, not blind worship to anything, including a flag, or a piece of paper, or a person, either real or imagined. Whether anyone likes it or not, that's who we are. If you were in the military - thanks. I hope you fought for more than a flag or a person. You fight for each and every one of us to say whatever the fuck we want. Even if that means we say your service isnt what we want or hope for.

My take: Individualism is what this country is all about. Fuck collectivism in any form.

Oh, and fuck Behr Deckover as well.
Click to expand...

and i agree with you....on all accounts.

as I've said in this thread and others, including my personal example...

yes it pisses me off when i see people that don't stand for the pledge or anthem.

And they have that right. Period.

same with burning the flag.

not sure how much more black and white I can make it.

If the fact that I say "charge them with open burning because IT IS a law" detracts from that, I REALLY don't GAF.

Really.

if it's the law and on the books then the argument of "oh well he said to find something to charge them with anyway" doesn't fly.

It's a crime/violation so have a nice fucking day and sit in jail.

don't like the laws, do something to change them.
 
Darth

Darth

Bunny In Chief
Messages
19,025
Reaction score
23,672
Location
MoCo
Good, at least you finally admit that you don’t really agree with the 1st amendment if the speech offends you. We finally got to it.

“Sure, they might have that right, but we’ll just find something else to charge them with because I don’t like their display and they should be punished for it in some manner.”

Took long enough.
 
Curmudgeon

Curmudgeon

.308 Win
Messages
2,943
Reaction score
3,881
Location
The Internet
Doc8404 said:
and i agree with you....on all accounts.

as I've said in this thread and others, including my personal example...

yes it pisses me off when i see people that don't stand for the pledge or anthem.

And they have that right. Period.

same with burning the flag.

not sure how much more black and white I can make it.

If the fact that I say "charge them with open burning because IT IS a law" detracts from that, I REALLY don't GAF.

Really.

if it's the law and on the books then the argument of "oh well he said to find something to charge them with anyway" doesn't fly.

It's a crime/violation so have a nice fucking day and sit in jail.

don't like the laws, do something to change them.
Click to expand...

I dont like most laws. Do my best to ignore them.
 
spat

spat

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
26,027
Reaction score
54,107
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
DoD1776 said:
Libertarians love to say, “no government, no government, less government, less government!” When its convenient for them... for example, @Darth you are for mandatory vaccines right? Correct me if I’m wrong but I know you’ve always have been for people getting vaccinated and this includes mandatory vaccines but at the same time they say less government but now you’re involving the government. I’ve seen this numerous times on libertarian pages (which I follow on Facebook and Instagram.) I called libertarians a hypocrite for that very reason, because they say “little government” when it’s convenient for them and more government when it’s convenient for them. A healthy scepticism of the state is good, because both historically speaking and even today, the biggest oppressor of humanity is government. Even in liberal democracies, civil liberties are violated far too often.

I’ve been super super busy and today was the last day of school so I didn’t have time to message everyone back.
Click to expand...
Libertarians think there should be as little government as possible, but no less.

If you don't have enough government, you get anarchy. Anarchy is unstable and will quickly devolve into some very non-libertarian form of warlordism.

So, libertarians all believe in *some* government. We don't all agree on how much you need.

It isn't hypocritical if one libertarian thinks we need a little more government than another libertarian.
 
Edwardteach72

Edwardteach72

.475 A&M Magnum
U.S. Military
Messages
14,883
Reaction score
15,065
Location
New York
spat said:
Libertarians think there should be as little government as possible, but no less.

If you don't have enough government, you get anarchy. Anarchy is unstable and will quickly devolve into some very non-libertarian form of warlordism.

So, libertarians all believe in *some* government. We don't all agree on how much you need.

It isn't hypocritical if one libertarian thinks we need a little more government than another libertarian.
Click to expand...


Very well said
 
Defilade

Defilade

.577 Tyrannosaur.
Messages
23,252
Reaction score
33,444
Location
Elsewhere
Is "Hate Speech" protected? :popcorn: or is this just one sided? Since we say that burning the Flag is fine, how about the "N" word? Discrimination against Jews?? Are there not repercussions?
 
BDinPutnam

BDinPutnam

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,492
Reaction score
20,850
Location
Someplace else
Defilade said:
Is "Hate Speech" protected? :popcorn: or is this just one sided? Since we say that burning the Flag is fine, how about the "N" word? Discrimination against Jews?? Are there not repercussions?
Click to expand...

What do you mean by "discrimination?"

There is a significant difference between speech and action. You wouldnt know it based on the internet of course.
 
GOPerfect

GOPerfect

.700 Nitro Express
LEO / LEA
Messages
28,526
Reaction score
63,887
Location
No longer Secret, thanks DR. Evil
By the way...

This is actually not a new thing with this Congress and Trump.

This idea has been floating around for many, many years.

Prior to 1989, this was an unlawful act.

Me, I thing SCOTUS got this ruling wrong. Just my opinion.
 
DoD1776

DoD1776

NYGF's own Whippersnapper !
U.S. Military
Messages
5,100
Reaction score
4,756
Location
Baldwinsville/Onondaga
Willjr75 said:
What the fuck kind of username is that? Department of Defense 1776?
Click to expand...
I didn’t want my username to be my first name anymore so I chose something random lol. My nickname from my recruiters is DoD and OD, it was originally soldierboy and my friends caught onto DoD and OD so now it’s that. so I just said fuck it because I had no other names on my mind. Shouldn’t you be asleep?
 
Cooolone

Cooolone

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,709
Reaction score
8,556
Location
NY, USA
I know I'm late to this and didn't read pages 2-4...

But it's simple... Regardless of my personal feelings either for/against the subject!...

There is no higher form of expression to exhibit a message to your Gov't, than to destroy an image or symbol which represents it!... The very fact that the two possibilities exist, demonstrate the fact also that the Constituion which allows this all to happen is actually still working! If the attempt to control expression and speech for/against the Gov't is allowed to be instituted by that Gov't, then the Constitution is just a piece of paper.

Just my $.02
 
FrankenCub

FrankenCub

.338 Win Mag
Messages
6,803
Reaction score
8,220
Location
Broome Co, NY
I should to add to one of my previous posts, that also, if I should feel the hankerin to burn the NYS flag, I will with a happy heart.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top