Looks like Chief Justice Roberts has granted cert for the Firearms Policy Foundation bumpstock case.
SCOTUS grants certiorari Guedes v. BATFE
- Thread starter Edwardteach72
- Start date
Wow.
C3D
.308 Win
Yeah let’s not get excited. This was a routine extension of time to file, not a decision to hear the case. There is nothing to be learned from this.
Since large faction of pro- gun side came out against bump-stocks, including the NRA, it will be easy for SCOTUS to rule against them. This is why they took this case. This is no good, bad precedent will be established.
They don't even want to uphold normal capacity magazines, no way they will uphold bump stocks.
They don't even want to uphold normal capacity magazines, no way they will uphold bump stocks.
I think the only way they will rule in "our" favor is how it went down... which then the "trump is playing string theory chess" group will jump around reeeeeing "told you so"
Shadow2
6.5 Creedmoor
This isn't too different then the NY pistol case. Employees of the people defining whats legal and illegal. I hope to god SCOTUS tosses this shit out on its ass. I think bump stocks are useless pieces of crap. When a government agency can create their own definitions we've got a serious problem.
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
the box van truck lets say aka GMC didn't have to crush all there Trucks or company's that owned them because some nut drove thru a crowd and killed a bunch and injured a bunch more ..
Last edited:
Uhg this is a beautiful analogy and sadly I dont think as many people will get this as should
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
Burzum
.223 Rem
Another example of the so-called "Conservative" Supreme Court totally avoiding meaningful gun cases, is it not time for Roberts to just stop living in denial and admit he is a gun-hating liberal.
MadScientist
.45 acp
Yeah I mean when you think about a Justice, they are highly educated, often from decent and rural upbringings, reside around DC. In general not the kind of people you’d come to associate with defending gun rights.
People like Clarence Thomas are a rare gem in those circles
SCOTUS is a big theater for the masses, where justices play their roles. There isn't a dime worth of difference between them. It doesn't matter who sits there. They will always pretend to be a divided court. Passionate pro-2nd amendment minority opinions are not worth the paper they are written on, it's an illusion that our side was represented there by some one. Supreme Circus.