AR poll Washington times.

Classic!

nice post but like, won't make any difference

Ha!

It's funny how these polls usually go in our favor, yet the media says that the majority of the country is for more gun control. I wonder which one is pushing the propaganda (hint: it ain't our side).

Catskillkid said:

It's funny how these polls usually go in our favor, yet the media says that the majority of the country is for more gun control. I wonder which one is pushing the propaganda (hint: it ain't our side).

Click to expand...

Well to be fair these polls get posted on a gun forum and then trolled by its members. It’s an awful way to poll people, and its results totally meaningless.

And another.

that was fast cuz i just voted and screen cap on my post lol

wounder why they left out the AR-10 in the poll ? hummmm

Still 97%. 34000 some odd votes cast.

Blimey said:

Well to be fair these polls get posted on a gun forum and then trolled by its members. It’s an awful way to poll people, and its results totally meaningless.

Click to expand...

They also get posted on anti-gun forums, who also try to troll the results.
But, I agree, it is an inefficient way to get accurate results.
And it is totally meaningless since WT will bury the results and spew whatever nonsense they want to push. In this case, an anti-gun agenda.

Just voted it's still 97% no

Acer-m14 said:

wounder why they left out the AR-10 in the poll ? hummmm

Click to expand...

It's minus 5 from an AR15 so it does not qualify as a dangerous rifle.


Also just voted. Still 97% no.

Just an update almost 40,000 no votes

Blimey said:

Well to be fair these polls get posted on a gun forum and then trolled by its members. It’s an awful way to poll people, and its results totally meaningless.

Click to expand...

That would make sense if it didnt restrict a person to a single vote (that's how we won yeet cannon from hippoint, anyone on a smartphone could vote as many times or as often as they wanted) but this poll only let's you vote 1 time... so not trolled at all

Blimey said:

Well to be fair these polls get posted on a gun forum and then trolled by its members. It’s an awful way to poll people, and its results totally meaningless.

Click to expand...

Edwardteach72 said:

That would make sense if it didnt restrict a person to a single vote (that's how we won yeet cannon from hippoint, anyone on a smartphone could vote as many times or as often as they wanted) but this poll only let's you vote 1 time... so not trolled at all

Click to expand...

but the best part of this poll is you did not have to sign up and give your life info .. name age color phone num , email .. ect in a form ..

Blimey said:

Well to be fair these polls get posted on a gun forum and then trolled by its members. It’s an awful way to poll people, and its results totally meaningless.

Click to expand...

Yep, over on arfcom they call it a "fire mission"
But like @Grimscale mentioned, on anti-gun forums, they also try to troll the results.

The polls are meaningless but I still enjoy the fact that these polls usually backfire right in their face regardless of the circumstances.



Back when Rob Astorino was running against FUAC. My local online news had a poll about who is supporting who.
So I went on arfcom and called in a fire mission... LOL

To be fair, Astorino had a huge lead in the poll before I called in the fire mission.
But after the fact, it was something like 97% Astorino 3% FUAC... LMAO

I probably shouldn't have done that though. The owner of the website probably thought,
I never get nowhere near this many responses to my polls, WTF is going on?
A lot of arfcom members from all over the country had to take the time and start a new account with this website
to participate in the poll... That goes to show, how much, all gun owners, country wide, hates FUAC.

He got fire missioned by Bigfoot compliments of arfcom.