I think the thing with the Epstein files is that the whole world order would burn to the ground if they were released in full.
Where I disagree with Trump is I say that's a price worth paying, and I think he's scared of the power vacuum it would leave.
And slavery, the 3/5ths compromise, Japanese internment, Jim Crow, The Trail of Tears, confiscation of privately held gold, etc, etc...
By your logic, the holocaust was perfectly fine because it followed all the German laws at rhe time.
Unfortunately he needn't be present, he just had to issue the order personally.
He could have phoned it in from the beach and it would have still been valid.
Just bring Biden in for questioning in front of congress about it.
Show him a bunch of documents and ask if he authorized those signatures.
Include a bunch that you just made up.
Have them get progressively more ridiculous as you get to the bottom of the pile.
When Biden testifies under oath...
Ftlbs is from the ammo, not the rifle anyway.
"I just download my 20mm Lhati L-39 to 1500fps and it good to go".
Oh, that other 20x138 ammo isn't for the rifle, it's just for the collection value.
I do have to say I really appreciate the "muzzle angry" typo. That should be an official unit...
The real question about liability insurance is:
"Didn't NY already outlaw liability insurance ?"
Are they going to mandate something they already prohibited ?
There are a lot of legal issues with trying to do that.
But using their own network to give them the run around is perfectly legal, even for common citizens.
Download their app, and start reporting stuff that doesn't exist.
Get a lot of other people to coordinate the misreporting. Send their...
So, you're saying power is legitimacy and that's it ?
There is a social contract in the US, and it derives from the declaration of independence. If the principles enshrined in it are violated, then there is no legitimacy for the government that has resulted.
Or, do you think Al Capone was the...
The president can sign the documents using any means he chooses, autopen included.
But, there's a lot of evidence that Biden wasn't the one signing these.
Basically, if the president says "sign these pardons with the autopen" that's kosher.
If some underling just says "use the autopen to sign...
If ICE was smart, they would get a bunch of people to corrupt the surveillance network driving this stuff.
Then use that to trigger protests at places of their choosing, while conducting real operations elsewhere.
Drain the resources or the resistance network.
"We're going into neighborhood...
She has participated in several other interviews etc where the interviewer tries to get her to apologize for basically being a good looking white girl and she has handled them very well, essentially telling the interviewer where to stick their line of questioning.
Anyone claiming illegal immigrants can't get "X" benefit is basically lying.
They can't *legally* get the benefit, but they can't *legally* even be here.
Someone who is using a stolen identity to support their day to day existence can certainly use the same to fraudulently claim benefits...
An escort is paid to screw the client. A lobbiest is paid by the client to screw large groups of other people.
I guess that makes them more like porn stars.
Bonnie Blue's got nothing on the average lobbiest.
NO.
That is the antithesis of everything the US stands for.
*THE PEOPLE* are the boss. The government, to include SCOTUS, exists for the sole reason of safeguarding the rights of the people.
When they get it wrong, it is "the right of the people to alter or abolish" that government. That...
Citing the decisions of a court that has gotten so much wrong in the past isn't convincing.
The 2A says what it says, regardless of who says otherwise. No amount of pagentry or appeals to authority will change that.
On top of that, the 2A just *recognizes* the *fundamental human right* to...
Slaves were 3/5ths of a person until they weren't.
The people hiding Anne Frank were criminals.
The people who sent her to the death camp were just doing their job enforcing the law.
None of that is any more constitutional than FDRs internment of citizens with Japanese ancestors, or his confiscation of gold.
Just because the government gets away with violating the constitution doesn't change what it means and says.
Robbing a bank is still a crime, even if you get away with...
Because while there is a general exodus from the state, there is an even greater exodus from NYC.
So there are net people moving out of NYC and moving upstate.
They do have the English bill of rights from 1689 that guarantees an RKBA (limited to protestants, and weapons suitable to self defense, but an RKBA none the less), ours was derived from that.
Bill of Rights 1689 - Wikipedia Bill of Rights 1689 - Wikipedia
AI might upend the entire apple cart in the next 10 or 20 years.
Things might go *very* sideways depending on how that shakes out.
You could have a situation where productivity goes through the roof, so prices plummet all over the place, but at the same time most people won't be able to find...
The trick is I don't think I'll see the "get better" side of that in my lifetime, so I'd prefer the "get worse" side proceed as slowly as possible.
But, for sure, it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.
That's what the controversy is about here.
Trump's DOJ is pursuing the argument that it's still a tax even at $0.
And since SCOTUS already upheld a tax that you're not allowed to pay at all in the '86 shenanigans, it's not clear that they will reach the only logical conclusion here.
Maybe...
The problem there is that if you create a system where we *need* to know what that church was teaching in order to reach a conclusion, then the conclusion will be subject to the whims of fashion.
Now, I agree, if it's causing actual physical harm to the child, then that's actionable abuse.
But...
What Trump could have done would have been to simply not defend the indefensible before SCOTUS.
He doesn't have the power to remove the NFA, true.
But what people were asking in this case is when people brought the challenge to SCOTUS, just don't fight them.
When GOA et. al argued before...
It's like inflation.
Nothing is actually going to get better until we burn the whole place to the ground.
The best you can hope for is 4 years where it doesn't get much worse.
I'd take the Ar pistol over nothing for self defense, but I've literally got a dozen or more better choices. Probably anyone with a toy like that does too.
I'd take that 50bmg pistol over nothing too.
If I was down to choosing one or the other of them for self defense, I'd go for the AR...
I've never fired a .50bmg pistol, but from what I know about the interior ballistics, I'll not sure it *would* have massive recoil.
More than a 9mm for sure, but might not be too much worse than a .44mag.
It would be a very heavy pistol, no doubt about that. That would help with the recoil...
It's a toy.
I have some guns that also fall into that category.
I can't complain about a .50bmg pistol when I have a 5.56 pistol with a 7.5" barrel. Neither of them have a practical use other than bringing a smile to your face when you pull the trigger.
Yes, they are essentially at the mercy of the Isreaiis who would dog walk them in an actual war.
I was just pointing out that if that idea keeps them up at night, they should bear in mind what happens if the US decides they are too much of a detriment to our interests.
Sort of a "don't think...
I don't disagree.
But do we really want the government deciding what topics are dangerous brainwashing ?
What if it's the father who is trying to trans the kid here and the "dangerous brainwashing" from the church is just that there are only 2 genders, and you don't get to pick yours ?
There...
I fire my carry gun often enough that I feel reasonably proficient with it.
But I would not shoot it anywhere near as much as some of my other guns. So the shooting I do with the other guns also raises my proficiency with the LCP.
You are way better off shooting 30 rounds with the LCP and 500...
2 ? I have like 20.
My carry gun is optimized for ease of carry. But I don't just own guns for defense. I own them for fun too.
Just like I have 4 registered vehicles with only 2 drivers in the house. I don't want to drive the Deuce to Tucson for dinner, and I don't want to try to haul...
If it's not criminally endangering the kid, then the judge has no business interfering.
Let's say it's a real fire and brimstone church, and they're preaching that some aspect of the father's life is sinful and he's headed for eternal damnation. Is that really something the government should...
Fuck diplomacy. It has it's place, but not here.
If it brings down a friendly foreign government, then so be it.
If it utterly destroys some allies, then so be it.
If it causes a fucking War, then cry havoc.
Because the problem is a lot bigger than just a few kids. The fact that those type...
If the church is really a danger to kids, just telling one mother she can't take her one kid there is *not* the answer.
So, either this is bullshit, or the Judge is OK endangering dozens of other kids.
This needs to be either nothing, or a full blown criminal investigation. There is no...