MothMan
.338 Win Mag
Judge ruled that the 2A does not protect semi automatic “killing macho”.
Judge: 2nd Amendment Does Not Protect Semiautomatic 'Killing Machines'
Judge: 2nd Amendment Does Not Protect Semiautomatic 'Killing Machines'
2A Does Not Protect Semi Automatics
- Thread starter MothMan
- Start date
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Again it's a cali judge FUCK cali and their rulings 
E the massive
.308 Win
Well then, I suggest you start going door to door and round them up.
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Yup, come get em.
Deplorable Me
.577 Tyrannosaur.
What about weapons of mass propaganda?
Twogunwilly
6.5 Creedmoor
something something something... common use... blah blah blah. I'm thinking that's settled law & why hasn't he been fired?
repete
.338 Win Mag
Damn there's some things the human eye just shouldn't see!
Him!!!
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Stanton opined that a ban on M-16s can stand under scrutiny of District of Columbia v. Heller(2008), because such guns are “outside the scope of the Second Amendment.”
I told you Scalia’s Trojan Horse that said that dangerous and unusual weapons weren’t protected would be used against us.
I told you Scalia’s Trojan Horse that said that dangerous and unusual weapons weren’t protected would be used against us.
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I don’t think it matters. The M16 is supposed to be protected too until the NFA and later Scalia.
Direct contradiction of Supreme Court ruling about common use guns.
But Stanton rejected the summary judgement request, characterizing “semiautomatic rifles with non-fixed magazines” as “killing machines” which “are essentially indistinguishable from M-16s.”
If this is accurate then he opened the door to ban ALL semis including those without a pistol grip. Maybe the shooting will start in CA first if they ban and try to confiscate mini 14/30s or even ARs with Thorsden stocks.
If this is accurate then he opened the door to ban ALL semis including those without a pistol grip. Maybe the shooting will start in CA first if they ban and try to confiscate mini 14/30s or even ARs with Thorsden stocks.
This is so disgusting and infuriating. It most certainly does protect semi automatics. It protects belt fed, open bolt full auto machineguns too. The 2A was intended to codify the right of the people to possess the same arms as the standing army had. Specifically for the purpose of enabling rebellion against a government turned tyrannical. Well what point do you all think we are at? There is no other option than to take up arms and revolt against our corrupt and authoritarian government and to fight against all those that would support it. Full stop.
We will know no peace, no liberty until this is done.
We will know no peace, no liberty until this is done.
Celt
.338 Win Mag
These tyrannical politicians infuriate me as much as you, but sadly its going to take more to get the great majority of patriots to take up arms. The build up to the 1st revolution had much harsher tyranny. Settlers were told they couldnt move west to try to better their lives because the king didnt want to lose taxes. They were forced to house and feed soldiers of the crown, etc.. sure their taxes were lower by % but they also got nothing for their taxes. If was a different type of world back then that was harsh. Today, if someone doesnt work the govt will feed, house, provide medical, and give them a damn mind control device (aka cell phone).
MOST people will tolerate ALOT of tyranny before risking their lives, and facing a corrupt judicial system. I wish this wasnt the case.
Last edited:
spat
.700 Nitro Express
The next round of fighting will look nothing like the last one.
Conventional wars in general may be on their way out, replaced with guerrilla insurgencies.
I expect if it happens, it won't start with a Lexington and Concord type battle (and remember, the American tactics at Lexington and Concord were nothing like the way wars had been fought previously either).
It will start with some legislator or judge who makes an egregious ruling just getting removed from office the hard way by someone who wasn't involved in the case at all and then disappears back into the population.
There will also be some suicide attacks. Imagine of Marvin Heemeyer had been a long range shooter instead of a mechanic. Instead of a killdozer he might have just planned out one night of the long knives and eliminated many of the officials who screwed him.
Who knows, history might recognize Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the killdozer as the "opening shots" of the next war. We may not know for another 30 years.
Last edited:
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I’m guessing some really big dude who drives a truck will fire the first shot of the 2nd American Civil War.
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
There are no limitations on the second amendment. There is only the degree to which we're comfortable violating the second amendment as a country that is really going on.
The goal of 2A was to allow the militia (the people) to be armed on the same level as the average infantry soldier. The fact that regular citizens can't have the same functionality in their personal firearms as the military is garbage.
We should stop bullshitting ourselves as a country, and just call a damn constitutional convention to get clarity.
The goal of 2A was to allow the militia (the people) to be armed on the same level as the average infantry soldier. The fact that regular citizens can't have the same functionality in their personal firearms as the military is garbage.
We should stop bullshitting ourselves as a country, and just call a damn constitutional convention to get clarity.
What clarity, fuck lot of "pro gun" or "pro 2a" people (hell we know they exist on here) will say that the 2A doesnt protect .... or that machine guns should be illegal...
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
Not on God's watch.
Fixed it for you
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
Why post the same picture, tho?
Your picture left out the holy scriptures
spat
.700 Nitro Express
If your attitude to everyone less focused than you with regard to the 2A is "fuck them", and everyone more focused than you says "fuck him too", what kind of fight do you think you'll be able to muster ?
Quite frankly, anyone who says we need to roll back *any small bit* of existing gun control is an ally, even if you don't agree how much.
Even people who think what we have is OK, but oppose anything new should be considered friendlies.
We allied with the Russians in WW2, not because we agreed with them, but because they were willing to fight the common enemy. If we hadn't we all would have lost. We are in the same sort of existential conflict now.
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
Agreed we should take what we can get, but still we shouldn't forget the end goal -- rolling it back as far as can be done.
