We need the Get Some Guy to do flyovers over California.Get some!!!!!!
It's hard to tell exactly what he's holding, but that sound and cyclic rate is distinctive to the mp5 9mm. Nothing surprising about certain police carrying automatic weapons, it's nothing new.
Because it's not that useful for law enforcement situations? Or most military applications either.Wait why wouldn't police have access to full auto?
It's hard to tell exactly what he's holding, but that sound and cyclic rate is distinctive to the mp5 9mm. Nothing surprising about certain police carrying automatic weapons, it's nothing new.
Because it's not that useful for law enforcement situations? Or most military applications either.
I guess everyone likes toys.What does that have to do with anything
Semi could have also. Or your favorite.... a shotgunIt obviously worked here.
Disagree, particularly on the second point. I advocate for the complete deregulation of full auto guns. That said the usefulness of fully automatic fire is inversely proportional to the legal liabilities of the shooter.Because it's not that useful for law enforcement situations? Or most military applications either.
I never said anything about regulation. I'm saying full auto is not that useful for a rifleman (not talking machine gunner in a military setting).Disagree, particularly on the second point. I advocate for the complete deregulation of full auto guns. That said the usefulness of fully automatic fire is inversely proportional to the legal liabilities of the shooter.
The modern automatic rifle/carbine allows you to act as an ersatz machinegunner. In a tight spot you can use long bursts to suppress the enemy, or you can use short bursts to increase your hit probability. It offers flexibility that semi automatic only arms lack. There is a reason that military small arms have evolved the way they have, there is a reason for the 5.56x45, 5.45x39 and 5.8x42 and a reason for why they have endured despite constant criticism. It was learned decades ago that the main determining factor in a fire fight is who can get the most lead in the air. Now the civilian shooter requires much more precision. Legal liabilities and constraints in ammo supply demand a greater economy of fire so fully automatic fire is not as important, tactically speaking.I never said anything about regulation. I'm saying full auto is not that useful for a rifleman (not talking machine gunner in a military setting).
That is incorrect. You don't win that way anymore (maybe it worked in the past). Running out of lead projectiles is not the way to win. Machine gunners exist for a reason.The modern automatic rifle/carbine allows you to act as an ersatz machinegunner. In a tight spot you can use long bursts to suppress the enemy, or you can use short bursts to increase your hit probability. It offers flexibility that semi automatic only arms lack. There is a reason that military small arms have evolved the way they have, there is a reason for the 5.56x45, 5.45x39 and 5.8x42 and a reason for why they have endured despite constant criticism. It was learned decades ago that the main determining factor in a fire fight is who can get the most lead in the air. Now the civilian shooter requires much more precision. Legal liabilities and constraints in ammo supply demand a greater economy of fire so fully automatic fire is not as important, tactically speaking.
Nothing would have happened even if there was.lucky there was not collateral damage.
I have no experience with them. 9mm and heavy would make it seem that way!MP5’s are a dream to shoot, even on f/a. They are not hard to control at all.
Disagree.That is incorrect. You don't win that way anymore (maybe it worked in the past). Running out of lead projectiles is not the way to win. Machine gunners exist for a reason.
Don't take my word for it. This guy should know a bit more on the topic:
Full Auto: Not the Way to Go
and weight is the main reason for the smaller calibers.