A good guy with a gun.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/fox13n...n-in-salt-lake-county-starbucks-shooting/amp/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/fox13n...n-in-salt-lake-county-starbucks-shooting/amp/
Our company’s longstanding approach to “open carry” has been to follow local laws: we permit it in states where allowed and we prohibit it in states where these laws don’t exist.
...
For these reasons, today we are respectfully requesting that customers no longer bring firearms into our stores or outdoor seating areas—even in states where “open carry” is permitted—unless they are authorized law enforcement personnel.
I would like to clarify two points. First, this is a request and not an outright ban. Why? Because we want to give responsible gun owners the chance to respect our request—and also because enforcing a ban would potentially require our partners to confront armed customers, and that is not a role I am comfortable asking Starbucks partners to take on. Second, we know we cannot satisfy everyone.
So the guy just let the criminal beat up the girl and only shot him when he attacked the ccw holder. That’s some shot right there. I’d have protected the girl.
Okay hero, here's an alternate timeline. You walk into a Starbucks in New York. Another man enters, runs up to the counter girl, starts hollering at her and punching her in the face. You draw, tell him to get on the ground or you'll shoot. He says "Fuck you, you ain't doing shit!" and continues punching the girl. You fire one clean shot, severing his aorta. He drops and bleeds out in seconds. Counter girl kneels over his lifeless body, weeping and shrieking "Benjy, please don't die on me!"
Cops arrive, counter girl points at you and screams "That's the asshole that murdered my man!" You are cuffed, taken away, and charged with second degree murder.
Still glad you "protected the girl?"
So the fact he's beating a woman who knows him vs. a stranger makes it OK? That does not affect the situation for me.Okay hero, here's an alternate timeline. You walk into a Starbucks in New York. Another man enters, runs up to the counter girl, starts hollering at her and punching her in the face. You draw, tell him to get on the ground or you'll shoot. He says "Fuck you, you ain't doing shit!" and continues punching the girl. You fire one clean shot, severing his aorta. He drops and bleeds out in seconds. Counter girl kneels over his lifeless body, weeping and shrieking "Benjy, please don't die on me!"
Cops arrive, counter girl points at you and screams "That's the asshole that murdered my man!" You are cuffed, taken away, and charged with second degree murder.
Still glad you "protected the girl?"
So the fact he's beating a woman who knows him vs. a stranger makes it OK? That does not affect the situation for me.
So the fact he's beating a woman who knows him vs. a stranger makes it OK? That does not affect the situation for me.
I didnt say I was shooting anyone.It doesn't matter, known or unknown. Someone using hands on someone else is not a valid scenario to shoot someone. Even cops can only escalate one level. Hands vs baton.
Many comments here give me pause for thought. Long story I will try to shorten up.
Many years ago while driving on a rural road I see a guy and girl standing outside their car. They are obviously in a heated argument. I see him push / punch her in the upper chest shoulder area. I continue on down the road. After about a mile I think "Oh shit, what if he really does something bad". I turn around and go back to see her running into a field with him in pursuit!. I drive on again, not stopping. Get down the road a ways and again have second thoughts. Thinking that I could read about this in a couple days in the newspaper. So I go back a third time and now she is face down on the ground and he is on top of her with her arms pulled behind her. She is screaming and struggling.
Now I stop and run into the field. Drag the guy off the screaming girl. He tells me is is going to "Kick my ass". That did it for me and I grabbed him pushing him up against a tree. Just as I am about to arrange a meeting of my right fist and his face, the girl who has gotten off the ground jumps right onto my back and begins scratching and clawing at my face. She is screaming " leave him alone asshole". I get her off of me and tell her, " Lady there are two assholes here today and I definitely am not one of them". I left the two of them in the field that day and never looked back.
The memory of that experience has remained with me for many years and definitely plays a role in decisions I make to this day.
I think we all should have a plan or at least some sort of idea what we will or will NOT do when we are armed in public.
Certainly my actions with an intruder inside the confines of my home at 3AM would differ from my actions in a Starbucks witnessing the situation described in this thread. I have looked long and hard at "The Question". I am not the Lone Ranger, Robin Hood, the Enforcer, the Equalizer or pick whatever character you want. There may be some very special circumstances that could get me personally involved. However, that is a decision that will be need to be made at the appropriate time. I do believe for the vast majority of situations that may arise, I will be avoiding getting personally involved. I will remove myself from the area of danger and make the appropriate phone call. Even if I did intervene verbally in the situation that happened in Starbuck's, my first move would not be pulling my weapon.
I am a large person and many decades ago I never shied away from a confrontation and rarely came up holding the shitty end of the stick. But I am not the young buck I used to be. Life and conditions change and IMO play a major role in the decisions and actions we take. A large part of the answer to "the question" needs to be concluded prior to the situation occurring.
Just my rambling random thoughts on the subject.
Grayson Martin disagrees.It doesn't matter, known or unknown. Someone using hands on someone else is not a valid scenario to shoot someone. Even cops can only escalate one level. Hands vs baton.
Then if you do get a chance to be a hero getting in someone else's business where you don't know the scenario, enjoy the prison. You can tell the other inmates you shouldn't be there. That should help pass the time.So the fact he's beating a woman who knows him vs. a stranger makes it OK? That does not affect the situation for me.
Grayson Martin disagrees.
Everything you said is true. No denying. Now replace the "stranger" whose business you dont need to get involved in and replace them with your wife, daughter, son, mother, or someone else whose life and well being have meaning and value to you.Then if you do get a chance to be a hero getting in someone else's business where you don't know the scenario, enjoy the prison. You can tell the other inmates you shouldn't be there. That should help pass the time.
Cops have limited immunity to get in other people's business and it's their job. You don't have immunity and it's not your job. And cops still get second-guessed and worse all the time, as we see in the news.
There's a difference between helping someone in an altercation with another person versus helping someone who is not. Although, all is not always what it seems in those cases either. Someone drowning in a pond probably really needs help, but someone who is "out of gas" or "broken down" or "needs directions" might have other motives.
Your responsibility is to yourself and your children first and foremost. If you put your life and liberty on the line for a stranger, you had better damn well know what you are doing. Most don't.
Ah, so you need a confirmed head bash to be a lethal threat. Got it.Completely different. He was using concrete to bash his skull in, very different than a fist fight.
That changes everything. Those people are an extension of yourself and those people are the exact reason why you carry.Everything you said is true. No denying. Now replace the "stranger" whose business you dont need to get involved in and replace them with your wife, daughter, son, mother, or someone else whose life and well being have meaning and value to you.
Agreed. So the simple point I'm making is that someone who I care about, who is not in my "bubble of protection" at all times, My 5 foot 98 pound wife is getting her face caved in by some piece of shit for reasons unknown. Do I appreciate the fact that a good samaritan takes it upon himself to stop him from making her face a plastic surgeon's career or do I thank him for not "getting involved". I'm not saying he kill the scumbag, but if said scumbag decides he wants a piece of the good samaritan, then what? Anyone get what I'm saying here?That changes everything. Those people are an extension of yourself and those people are the exact reason why you carry.
Of course you would appreciate it. But you also have to ask yourself if your wife should depend on a stranger to protect her. More won't than will. Especially if a gun is involved.Agreed. So the simple point I'm making is that someone who I care about, who is not in my "bubble of protection" at all times, My 5 foot 98 pound wife is getting her face caved in by some piece of shit for reasons unknown. Do I appreciate the fact that a good samaritan takes it upon himself to stop him from making her face a plastic surgeon's career or do I thank him for not "getting involved". I'm not saying he kill the scumbag, but if said scumbag decides he wants a piece of the good samaritan, then what? Anyone get what I'm saying here?
Never mind. I'm done with this.Of course you would appreciate it. But you also have to ask yourself if your wife should depend on a stranger to protect her. More won't than will. Especially if a gun is involved.
Ah, so you need a confirmed head bash to be a lethal threat. Got it.
Quite correct. An argument not refuted, but talked about.Standard Darth argument.