Justincase
6.5 Creedmoor
Took all three to the range tonight and there were definitely some ups and downs. Loaded up two mags from each gun and fired rounds at 24' just to get a feel. Now the VP9 is my go to, the first gun I bought and the one I use for PPC matches so I'm pretty familiar with it. It was my first time shooting the other two. Shot the VP9 first to get a feel so I can compare the other two. Next was the CZ P10c. Fired one round, FTE. Cleared it, fired another, same thing. One more, FTE. Fuck. Move on to Canik TP9SF. First round down range, FTL. Cleared, second round, FTE. Third, one or the other I forget. Now I'm thinking what the fuck? I've NEVER had a new gun fail so readily, now I've got two in one day?! I was using 124 grain PMC Bronze ammo, so I decided to swap the rest of the magazines with Remington UMC, and there were no problems after that. That was a relief, but it was interesting that the VP9 had no problems cycling it.
As for the guns themselves, I'm a bit disheartened. I've put about 500 or so rounds through the VP9 and it seems that I was able to shoot both, the CZ and the Canik more accurately. The CZ especially just felt like it pointed so naturally, was planted firmly in my hands and the sights are excellent. The trigger is every bit as good as they say it is. For me the thing was dead nuts accurate.
The Canik was great too. Not as much grip as the CZ, but more than the VP9. The grip on the VP9 is by far the most comfortable of the the three, but it could be a tad grippier. The trigger on the Canik is almost indiscernable from the CZ. At 24' I shot all of them equally well, but at 50' I was much more accurate with the CZ and the Canik.
Here's one of the targets at 50'. Center was the VP9. Bottom right was the CZ. A couple fliers from one or the other. I'm going to have to spend more time with all of these to see what's causing the disparity.
As for the guns themselves, I'm a bit disheartened. I've put about 500 or so rounds through the VP9 and it seems that I was able to shoot both, the CZ and the Canik more accurately. The CZ especially just felt like it pointed so naturally, was planted firmly in my hands and the sights are excellent. The trigger is every bit as good as they say it is. For me the thing was dead nuts accurate.
The Canik was great too. Not as much grip as the CZ, but more than the VP9. The grip on the VP9 is by far the most comfortable of the the three, but it could be a tad grippier. The trigger on the Canik is almost indiscernable from the CZ. At 24' I shot all of them equally well, but at 50' I was much more accurate with the CZ and the Canik.
Here's one of the targets at 50'. Center was the VP9. Bottom right was the CZ. A couple fliers from one or the other. I'm going to have to spend more time with all of these to see what's causing the disparity.