These dumbfucks ban liability insurance, and then make it mandatory to have it? No way this bullshit holds up.
That insurance was to benefit you, this insurance benefits the victim or survivors.These dumbfucks ban liability insurance, and then make it mandatory to have it? No way this bullshit holds up.
That insurance was to benefit you, this insurance benefits the victim or survivors.
Insurance companies would be chomping at the bit. Insurance companies never ever lose money. Every legal gun owner paying on a policy that might pay out a few million a year. How many legal gun owners actually shoot people?I doubt any insurance company is going to even touch something like this. Think about it. You think anyone is going to touch insuring people on the grounds they could commit some sort of shooting? The cost would be through the roof to them not because they're common, but because each individual event would create a legal frenzy of lawsuits to get as much cash as possible.
If the liability insurance is to "protect the victims" then this sounds like a round about way to engage in privacy intrusions they couldn't legally do. We'd be talking the insurance companies would give you tons of evaluations, make you jump through a lot of hoops to lower their risk, all to potentially deny you and your 2A rights. It would effectively give insurance companies the ability to deny your 2A rights.
That's why if passed this law will not stand.I'm good...
4. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY PEACE OFFI-
CER, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2.10 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, POLICE
OFFICER, AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION THIRTY-FOUR OF SECTION 1.20 OF THE
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, OR ANY MEMBER OF THE MILITARY WHO IS ON "ACTIVE
DUTY" OR "IN ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES" AS DEFINED IN
SECTION ONE OF THE MILITARY LAW, WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO CARRY A FIREARM.
What the either do not understand, or they do not care is that this will in FACT go through the Court System. It will in FACT be found un-Constitutional. Any gun owner that picked up this insurance due to this law will be reimbursed by the State.
I'm good...
4. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY PEACE OFFI-
CER, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2.10 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, POLICE
OFFICER, AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION THIRTY-FOUR OF SECTION 1.20 OF THE
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, OR ANY MEMBER OF THE MILITARY WHO IS ON "ACTIVE
DUTY" OR "IN ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES" AS DEFINED IN
SECTION ONE OF THE MILITARY LAW, WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO CARRY A FIREARM.
What the either do not understand, or they do not care is that this will in FACT go through the Court System.
It will in FACT be found un-Constitutional.
Any gun owner that picked up this insurance due to this law will be reimbursed by the State.