Why the staggered magazine load quantities?
A larger capacity magazine is always better. What if you only have one hand because the other one is occupied ? What if the 7th shot is the one that would finally put him down but instead you have to reload and in that slight pause, he shoots you? What if you fumble and drop the magazine?
Or when your not in a calm controlled situation when you hands are shaking like a leaf and your dexterity is shot.I don’t think that magazine malfunction is the point of the video though. He’s trying to say that is capacity makes no difference in firepower. I say that it does during certain circumstances. When you reload, you don’t have the person in your sights.
You realize the point of this video was to show that magazine restrictions offer no benefit in mass shooter events and put civilians at a disadvantage, right? Some of these comments are reflexively anti-cop (as expected). The sheriff was trying to help your argument.
Read the powerpoints. In the beginning and at the end there's statements reflecting this.
The test is BS anyway. The guy had all the magazines on a barrel in front of him. If he was kneeling behind cover and had them concealed underneath his jacket and shirt or in a pocket, it would have been slower. Or if he wasn’t counting rounds because bullets we’re coming at him, and it went empty, he would have been slower.I used to like this video for what it demonstrated. But now not so much. Remember the gun grabbers don't think logically. They actually think backwards. This will be proof that you don't need anything over 10 rounds and not that it doesn't make a difference what capacity you have. Not that I care about convincing the other side but this is how I feel about the video now.
Most cops I know have 17 round mags. So it’s ok for them but not us.
Not to mention he sped up on shooting the more magazines he had to reload. He's clearly shooting much faster with the 6 rounders than the 15s. I don't think counting the rounds is an issue in this test as long as it's done in all the sets.The test is BS anyway. The guy had all the magazines on a barrel in front of him. If he was kneeling behind cover and had them concealed underneath his jacket and shirt or in a pocket, it would have been slower. Or if he wasn’t counting rounds because bullets we’re coming at him, and it went empty, he would have been slower.
That’s why there’s such a thing as a combat reload. If reloading didn’t slow you down at all, a combat reload wouldn’t exist.
It’s a statement of fact. How is that anti cop?Saltwater60 said: ↑
Most cops I know have 17 round mags. So it’s ok for them but not us.
I think you are being too sensitive. Sort of like those black people that can make anything you say racist.It has nothing to do with the point of the video, so either he didn't watch it and went with what he expected the video showed or he watched it and didn't get the point. Either way, a clear example of predetermined bias effecting judgement. I'm an expert on this now since it has been trained out of me!