I missed the part in the story where they returned the gun to its owner.
For what purpose that properly documented photos and chains of custody wouldn't accomplish?Would think it would be held as evidence, No?
For what purpose that properly documented photos and chains of custody wouldn't accomplish?
If your house gets broken into, the authorities don't keep it for 3 or more years while trials and appeals are exhausted. Same for a car.
Why is it different with guns?