The feds are now indicting their own informant as the kidnapping case of gov . Whitmer falls apart

[livingston]

The alleged kidnapping plot seems to have unraveled as little more than an orchestrated scam, set into motion from the beginning by law enforcement
Court documents indicate that Robeson came in contact with the militants during a pro-2nd Amendment meeting in Dublin, Ohio. Adam Fox, who has been alleged to be a homeless mentally-ill man, was propped up as the patsy to lead the efforts. Robeson also attended a Northern Michigan tactical training session that prosecutors claim was to prepare for the Whitmer kidnapping

“A constitutional Michigan sheriff recently made some controversial comments about the thwarted raid against Governor Gretchen Whitmer that was promulgated by a confidential informant getting paid thousands of dollars by the feds.

While the plot itself is incredibly dubious and has all the makings of another FBI scam, Barry County Sheriff Dar Leaf believes that making a citizens arrest on Whitmer is justified considering the onslaught of intolerable acts she has inflicted upon her constituents

HATE HOAX: Feds Indict Their Own Informant in 'Kidnapping' Case Against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer - Big League Politics

This was a fake October surprise from the start.

bigleaguepolitics.com

 

[fresch]

This just in, politicians can't be trusted or their lackeys.

 

[livingston]

Senator Feinstein. “To be clear, this bill saves lives. When it was in place from 1994-2004, gun massacres declined by 37 percent compared with the decade before. After the ban expired, the number of massacres rose by 183 percent. We’re now seeing a rise in domestic terrorism, and military-style assault weapons are increasingly becoming the guns of choice for these
groups. I’m hopeful that with the new administration and Democratic control of the Senate, we can finally pass commonsense gun reforms to remove these deadly weapons from our communities

Feinstein needed a domestic terrorism case to make the case for banning guns .. FBI said We can whip one right up for you

 

[Saltwater60]

Senator Feinstein. “To be clear, this bill saves lives. When it was in place from 1994-2004, gun massacres declined by 37 percent compared with the decade before. After the ban expired, the number of massacres rose by 183 percent. We’re now seeing a rise in domestic terrorism, and military-style assault weapons are increasingly becoming the guns of choice for these
groups. I’m hopeful that with the new administration and Democratic control of the Senate, we can finally pass commonsense gun reforms to remove these deadly weapons from our communities

Feinstein needed a domestic terrorism case to make the case for banning guns .. FBI said We can whip one right up for you

No doubt about it. Just like why there are still the national guard in DC, still threats that never pan out, and why they are flooding the streets with criminals. No crime, no issues, no violence and gun control falls to the wayside.

 

[tirwin1]

Senator Feinstein. “To be clear, this bill saves lives. When it was in place from 1994-2004, gun massacres declined by 37 percent compared with the decade before. After the ban expired, the number of massacres rose by 183 percent. We’re now seeing a rise in domestic terrorism, and military-style assault weapons are increasingly becoming the guns of choice for these
groups. I’m hopeful that with the new administration and Democratic control of the Senate, we can finally pass commonsense gun reforms to remove these deadly weapons from our communities

Feinstein needed a domestic terrorism case to make the case for banning guns .. FBI said We can whip one right up for you

Without doing any research I can comfortably dismiss any statistics about gun violence coming from any democrat. Odds are 100% they cherry picked numbers or have an invalid methodology.

 

[libertysnake]

Why are we focusing on questions about numbers, when we should be focusing on the question of liberty and autonomy?

This is all a distraction from the real argument -- the people should be armed because governments are serially dishonest and never stand the test of time. World history is my evidence.

It's not because we need them "right now," we're far from it, but because protecting our right to have firearms is paramount to the day they might be needed in the future. It's a deterrent.

That's the real question. It's a question that requires people think about something the government does not want them to think about -- "Do I trust my government to do the right thing in the future, based on their current behavior?"

I think we all know the answer to that one.