The Global Government Wants to Flex its Muscle

[John Stark]

Note well that this bullshit would give the UN Secretary General unilateral power to declare emergencies. Read the whole thing:

IN-DEPTH: UN Seeks Vast New Powers for Global Emergencies

www.theepochtimes.com

Go ahead, tell me that a one-world government isn't on the agenda, both domestically and internationally.


In other words, nations who sign on to this would be forced to go along with whatever "emergency" was declared by an unelected bureaucrat. Further, it would subject the United States to the authority of some hack globalist who not only is NOT an American official of any sort (given that the Sec. General has never been an American, and at this point probably never will be), but is not even an American citizen.

You can bet your last dollar that the sock puppet squatter in the White House, owned by the Obamanation faction of traitors that are now in near total control of our government, are all in on this betrayal, gleefully ceding US sovereignty to foreign powers.

I would not be surprised to see this rammed down our throat by the politicos who now run this shitshow, sooner than later.

If we had a president that was worth a damn, he'd send the US military to the UN headquarters in NY City, clean out that den of serpents occupying our sovereign territory, send the bastards packing, demolish that building, and sow the ground with salt.

And if Congress dared squeak about it, tell them to fuck off for being traitors to their own nation and their own People.

 

[holdover]

Yup. Same thing with the global carbon tax. A tax that would fund a global government. And it would give it the power to limit industries based on the needs of climate change. control of industry.

 

[John Stark]

Teeing up for global lockdowns, mandatory vaccines, global cancel culture, and a lot more:

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

"They would hardwire into international law a top-down supranational approach to public health in which the WHO, acting in some cases via the sole discretion of one individual, its Director General (DG), would be empowered to impose sweeping, legally binding directions on member states and their citizens, ranging from mandating financial contributions by individual states; to requiring the manufacture and international sharing of vaccines and other health products; to requiring the surrender of intellectual property rights; overriding national safety approval processes for vaccines, gene-based therapies, medical devices and diagnostics; and imposing national, regional and global quarantines preventing citizens from traveling and mandating medical examinations and treatments.

A global system for digital ‘health certificates’ for verification of vaccine status or test results would be routinised, and a bio-surveillance network whose purpose would be to identify viruses and variants of concern – and to monitor national compliance with WHO policy directives in the event of them – would be embedded and expanded.

For any of these sweeping powers to be invoked, there would be no requirement for an “actual” health emergency in which people are suffering measurable harm; instead it would be sufficient for the DG, acting on his or her discretion, to have identified the mere “potential” for such an event.

It is hard to overstate the impact of these proposals on Member States’ sovereignty, individual human rights, foundational principles of medical ethics, and child welfare. As currently drafted, these proposals would deny UK sovereignty and governmental autonomy over health and social policies and, through the indirect impacts of forced lockdowns and quarantines and because each Member State would be required to commit a staggering minimum of 5 percent of national health budgets and an as yet unspecified percentage of GDP towards the WHO’s pandemic prevention and response, also over critical aspects of economic policy."
------------------------------------

Its not hard to overstate the impact on member states at all: it would be a complete takeover of the national sovereignty of any and all of them. Once the UN has this power, it will expand (as Holdover pointed already) to the climate scam, Arms control (aimed squarely at the US), and a whole host of other areas of national sovereignty. Our tyrannical politicos go along with this shit because they WANT US sovereignty diminished and the US shoved under global rather than national authority, and also because signing onto treaties and agreements like this because it gives a thin veneer of legal legitimacy, given the power treaties have as law even though our Constitution makes it plain that such cannot and should not cede national sovereignty.

------------------------------------
"The proposed new powers would cut across not only the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. They would signal a new watershed in our understanding of cornerstone human rights: an express amendment to the IHR deletes language currently reading “[t]he implementation of these Regulations shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons” to replace it with a nebulous confirmation that “[t]he implementation of these Regulations shall be based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence…”.
-------------------------------------

Here the author shows some naivety. UN declarations and statements on rights have always been nothing but cover for a corrupt international institution that cares not one whit about the rights or sovereignty of any given nation and its People. The UN has overseen atrocities around the world, including mass murder, rapes, human trafficking, war, famine, and so on, with the United States often hip deep in that at least, or directing it at worst.

The United Nations has never given a shit about so-called "human rights" (a misnomer if I've ever seen one) any more than they really care about the environment or a whole host of other matters. It is an unelected and unaccountable rogue organization that the US ought to abandon wholesale, but never will now.

The plannedemic protocols of lockdowns, forced vaccinations, testing, quarantine, concentration camps, contact tracing, and on and on will be far worse next time, and any nation sighing onto this "treaty" or going along with it will look just like China, where these protocols were already in place BEFORE Operation WuFlu. No one in China can buy or sell or otherwise participate in society without a phone and permission from the ChiCom party.

Many think the WuFlu scam is over, but the international criminals working behind the scenes are just bidding their time and working their networks until they can line up the next emergency.

The deep fear of contagion is something that goes back millennia, and for good reason; not just because there have been terrible outbreaks of deadly diseases (Black Plague comes to mind), but because it has also proven a useful tool to stomp undesirables into the mud.

 

[Dr. Evil]

I will NOT comply...

Make me...

View attachment 198602

Ditto.

 

[prambo]

[Oops!!! - accidentally erased post]

I will NOT comply...

Make me...