Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
instead of Green Tip 62 great Penetrators.
Did you see the video. Massive wound difference. The 55 grain is what the AR15 was designed for.I use it because it's cheap, flat and accurate.
But muh Gold Dots!Did you see the video. Massive wound difference. The 55 grain is what the AR15 was designed for.
Could it be that since 62gr is meant to go through armor it is not as effective on flesh?instead of Green Tip 62 great Penetrators.
M855 doesn't pen armor very well, nor does it even do very well through barriers.Could it be that since 62gr is meant to go through armor it is not as effective on flesh?
That's correct. The 62 gr Penetrator was originally designed for the m249 saw. It was later issued to the M16 for logistical reasons.Could it be that since 62gr is meant to go through armor it is not as effective on flesh?
Nor does it seem to do much damage on flesh according to that video. So what would you say it does here?M855 doesn't pen armor very well, nor does it even do very well through barriers.
But wasn't the 62gr the reason the military switched to a 1:7 twist rate over the 1:9?That's correct. The 62 gr Penetrator was originally designed for the m249 saw. It was later issued to the M16 for logistical reasons.
You can buy a lot of it for cheap. That's about it.Nor does it seem to do much damage on flesh according to that video. So what would you say it does here?
I think so. @Podmonkey ?But wasn't the 62gr the reason the military switched to a 1:7 twist rate over the 1:9?
Not really no. The original M16 twist rate was 1:12 which works fine for 55gr bullets. The move to 1:7 was originally for use with the heavier tracer rounds. The military never adopted a 1:9 twist.But wasn't the 62gr the reason the military switched to a 1:7 twist rate over the 1:9?
So 1:9 was for the civilian AR15 then?Not really no. The original M16 twist rate was 1:12 which works fine for 55gr bullets. The move to 1:7 was originally for use with the heavier tracer rounds. The military never adopted a 1:9 twist.
Yes. And I looked it up, the Military has both the M196 tracer which at 54gr is compatible with 1:12 twist and the M856 tracer which at 63gr shoots like the M855 round. So I infer from that the move to 1:7 was for the M855 cartridge.So 1:9 was for the civilian AR15 then?
That was the M16A1 spec yes. I think the earliest AR15 iterations used a 1:14 twist barrel. Quickly dropped for the 1:12.1:12 out of a 20"+ bbl?
I don't do hollow points brother.@Willjr75 gotta get some of them 185 gr 9mms... Seismic Ammo
Yes. Yes we do.LOL, I know...
we all know...
Only for rifles. In pistols they don't do squat from the research I've done.LOL, I know...
we all know...
Flattest trajectory out to 300 yards. But it gets pushed around by a cross breeze badly. 77gr is good for that.I think for what we as regular Joe's will be shooting at at normal ranges, the 55 grain is superior. The 50 grain TSX hollow point is even better.
You don't think that a lower grain for home defense would provide the greater velocity to do more damage? I mean that's why a 5.56 does more damage than a .308 at close range. Velocity. High velocity destroys more tissue than lower velocity.This thread is kinda a flawed premise though.
One of the great advantages of the 5.56/.223 is the huge variety of projectiles and loadings available. The AR15 user can tailor the cartridge used for the specific purpose needed. That is why I stock 3 loads in my 5.56 supply. M193 or 55gr in general for plinking, with the Hornady 55gr HP Match for our E matches, 64/62gr Gold Dot soft points for HD/SD use and the 77gr mk262 clones I reserve for precision target work
and primarily for use with my Recce carbine. Once it is scoped that is.
300 yard and beyond shots aren't really realistic don't you think? Unless you are in Afghanistan shooting mountain range to mountain range.... By us it'll be a hundred and fifty yards or less.Flattest trajectory out to 300 yards. But it gets pushed around by a cross breeze badly. 77gr is good for that.
I disagree with your assertions. A 12 gauge slug does horrendous damage to soft tissue. A 45/70 can reliably take down Bison, a 5.56 can't.You don't think that a lower grain for home defense would provide the greater velocity to do more damage? I mean that's why a 5.56 does more damage than a .308 at close range. Velocity. High velocity destroys more tissue than lower velocity.
Well that's extreme grain with those examples. Much larger bullet. The 55 grain vs 62 grain is the same diameter. Both will go clean through a person in most cases. With something like a bison you need the extra grain for penetration. Not so on a human with 5.56. The greater the velocity, the greater the stretch cavity.I disagree with your assertions. A 12 gauge slug does horrendous damage to soft tissue. A 45/70 can reliably take down Bison, a 5.56 can't.
Given the same bullet construction a .308 will cause more tissue damage.
The idea behind the Recce carbine is to have something can be effective under a wide variety of circumstances. Up close against soft targets it's very effective, at extended range it's still effective. I don't consider the Recce carbine to be my go to SD rifle. It's my Paul Revere has ridden down the street rifle. Or my SHTF rifle.300 yard and beyond shots aren't really realistic don't you think? Unless you are in Afghanistan shooting mountain range to mountain range.... By us it'll be a hundred and fifty yards or less.