Hochul Calls for Nationwide Ban on ‘Assault Weapons’ in Wake of NYC Shooting

FP1201 · Tuesday at 5:23 PM

livingston said:
Andrew Yang Criticizes ‘Automatic’ Rifles After Semiautomatic Rifle Used in Manhattan Attack
Failed Democrat presidential contender Andrew Yang responded to the Manhattan shooting by claiming “automatic” rifles are too easy to get in America.

Andrew Yang Criticizes 'Automatic' Rifles After Manhattan Shooting

Andrew Yang responded to the Manhattan shooting by claiming "automatic" rifles are too easy to get in America.

www.breitbart.com

Fuck them, they know they've no traction on anything anti-gun Federally, and they've already done their damnedest to prohibit them in NY, but they're Democrats and their stripes never change....never.

RedBreast21 · Tuesday at 5:29 PM

Once again, their policies on policing, training and basic safety of the public is exposed as complete political BS. You are your first line of defense every second of your life. The Defenseless will always be taken advantage of by those with the power. Politicians like her are the perfect example of that. Their body count of the defenseless out numbers any object. :beer:

FP1201 · Tuesday at 5:33 PM

RedBreast21 said:
Once again, their policies on policing, training and basic safety of the public is exposed as complete political BS. You are your first line of defense every second of your life. The Defenseless will always be taken advantage of by those with the power. Politicians like her are the perfect example of that. Their body count of the defenseless out numbers any object.

Why do you think the Left wants us "defenseless"? Ask the Britons how that shit's working out for them.

RedBreast21 · Tuesday at 5:52 PM

FP1201 said:
Why do you think the Left wants us "defenseless"? Ask the Britons how that shit's working out for them.

Not sure what you are getting at? If its my comment of their body count of the defenseless, that in reference to those that died because people were not allowed to be armed that could have stopped or reduced the death tolls in all of these so called mass shootings. :beer:

Carlos Hathcock · Tuesday at 5:56 PM

Dear Cunty Whorecul,

Fuck off. Fuck ALL THE WAY OFF. "Assualt rifle" is a bullshit term made up by dried up whore's like you. Fuck the fuck off.

Shadow rider · Tuesday at 6:35 PM

1075tech · Tuesday at 6:49 PM

livingston said:
carrying an assault weapon designed only for battlefields, but using it, intending to use that to commit mayhem and mass murder in our cities.”

So, which battlefield are the police on? Oh, wait, when the police are carrying an AR, it's a "patrol rifle". In the hands of the citizens, the same rifle magically becomes an "assault weapon" or "weapon of war"

Bigfoot · Tuesday at 6:51 PM

For anyone paying attention, who didn't see this coming from at least one of the Democrats?

Hochul the Horrible is such an asshole.
She's the asshole of all assholes.

But you all already know that.
I'm just saying.

Bigfoot · Tuesday at 6:57 PM

Carlos Hathcock said:
Dear Cunty Whorecul,

Fuck off. Fuck ALL THE WAY OFF. "Assualt rifle" is a made up term made up by dried up where's like you. Fuck the fuck off.

FP1201 · Tuesday at 7:02 PM

RedBreast21 said:
Not sure what you are getting at? If its my comment of their body count of the defenseless, that in reference to those that died because people were not allowed to be armed that could have stopped or reduced the death tolls in all of these so called mass shootings.

Democrats, particularly those in NYS Government are always going out of their way to limit, restrict, bad, deny, or outright prohibit all but the very special from having guns, all under the banner of "keeping New Yorker's safe" these Laws are never enough for the Left whose ultimate goal is total disarmament of the populace and total control by the Government that they hold Offices in...they claim compassion for those killed, but it's collateral damage that they can use to support their position by standing on the bodies. Being defenseless is the key: If you can't defend yourself/others, then you'll rely on the State, but they can't or won't be there in time, so you get killed, and the Politicians stand atop your body and tell us we need more gun control and more power to administer it for your safety.

RedBreast21 · Tuesday at 7:08 PM

FP1201 said:
Democrats, particularly those in NYS Government are always going out of their way to limit, restrict, bad, deny, or outright prohibit all but the very special from having guns, all under the banner of "keeping New Yorker's safe" these Laws are never enough for the Left whose ultimate goal is total disarmament of the populace and total control by the Government that they hold Offices in...they claim compassion for those killed, but it's collateral damage that they can use to support their position by standing on the bodies. Being defenseless is the key: If you can't defend yourself/others, then you'll rely on the State, but they can't or won't be there in time, so you get killed, and the Politicians stand atop your body and tell us we need more gun control and more power to administer it for your safety.

Ah got it. This is the greatest gun quote in my opinion and answers your question.

“If you are for gun control, then you are not against guns, because the guns will be needed to disarm people. So it’s not that you are anti-gun. You’ll need the police’s guns to take away other people’s guns. So you’re very pro-gun; you just believe that only the Government (which is, of course, so reliable, honest, moral and virtuous…) should be allowed to have guns. There is no such thing as gun control. There is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small political elite and their minions.” - Stefan Molyneux

Its also in my tag line below. :beer:

Saltwater60 · Tuesday at 7:10 PM

I’d love to know what battlefield this weapon is used on in this format. Pistols are used on the battlefield so are they next?

holdover · Tuesday at 7:14 PM

1075tech said:
So, which battlefield are the police on? Oh, wait, when the police are carrying an AR, it's a "patrol rifle". In the hands of the citizens, the same rifle magically becomes an "assault weapon" or "weapon of war"

Why do the police need guns?

to protect themselves from criminals! TA DAA!! See how that works?

S&W Fan · Tuesday at 7:36 PM

FUKH and your little Lap dog too

dsdmmat · Tuesday at 8:34 PM

These dictator wannabes months is: Never let a tragedy go to waste.
They see dollar signs when blood is spilled.

GOPerfect · Tuesday at 8:35 PM

Thank the gods for your governor....

TEOTWAWKI inc. · Tuesday at 9:19 PM

She should try to sponsor a U.S. House bill for this. That would be awesome.

TEOTWAWKI inc. · Tuesday at 9:27 PM

ChatGPT wrote it for her

117th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. ####

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Date of Introduction

Mr./Ms. [Representative's Name] (for him/herself and on behalf of the Governor of the State of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

---

A BILL

To prohibit the manufacture, sale, possession, and transfer of assault-style firearms deemed excessively intimidating in appearance, in order to promote public safety and reduce gun-related trauma.

---

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the "Federal Intimidating Weapons Ban Act of 2025".

SECTION 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds that:

1. The presence of militaristic and excessively aggressive-looking firearms in civilian hands contributes to a climate of fear and psychological distress.

2. The visual impact of certain weapons, regardless of their functionality, poses a threat to public order and peace of mind.

3. States, including New York, have led efforts to address gun violence through commonsense appearance-based regulations.

4. A nationwide standard is necessary to eliminate disparities and circumvent "gun tourism" between states with differing laws.

SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS.

For purposes of this Act:

1. The term "intimidating weapon" shall mean any semi-automatic rifle, shotgun, or handgun which:

Possesses a tactical or military-style appearance, including but not limited to:

Pistol grips

Telescoping or folding stocks

Flash suppressors

Rail systems or barrel shrouds

Matte black or camouflage coatings

Is marketed using language implying combat-readiness, military application, or psychological dominance.

Is deemed, at the discretion of the Bureau of Civilian Gun Aesthetics (BCGA), to resemble or evoke military weaponry.

2. The term "possess" shall include ownership, storage, or transport of such weapons.

SECTION 4. PROHIBITIONS.

(a) Manufacture and Sale Ban.
No person shall manufacture for sale, offer for sale, sell, or transfer any intimidating weapon as defined in Section 3.

(b) Possession Ban.
No person shall possess any intimidating weapon, unless such possession occurred prior to the enactment of this Act and is registered within 90 days.

(c) Penalties.
Any violation of this Act shall be punishable by a fine of up to $100,000, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both.

SECTION 5. NATIONAL REGISTRATION AND BUYBACK PROGRAM.

(a) The Attorney General shall implement a mandatory registration and voluntary surrender program for all weapons covered under this Act.

(b) Owners may surrender banned weapons to designated local law enforcement agencies in exchange for non-transferable federal tax credits up to $500 per item.

SECTION 6. ENFORCEMENT AND PREEMPTION.

(a) This Act shall preempt any and all state laws that permit the manufacture, sale, or possession of intimidating weapons.

(b) States and localities shall be required to cooperate with federal enforcement or risk a 15% reduction in federal law enforcement grant funding.

SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision of this Act is found unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the remainder shall not be affected and shall remain in full force.

SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall take effect 180 days after the date of enactment.

---

End of Bill

Hochulsucks1234 · Tuesday at 9:32 PM

So she now says that the shooter was able to have an AR because he has a concealed carry permit. She can't really be that stupid can she? Well perhaps not, considering its a semi-auto rifle and we need to have a permit here in New Yorkistan to have one. Regardless if the shooter didn't have a NY permit, don't think she is not plotting the next gun control law. I am thinking she wants to extend the semi auto permit to be restrictive and all rifles registered. I put nothing passed these tyrants.

Steal2B · Tuesday at 10:32 PM

Phazer · Tuesday at 10:34 PM

livingston said:
Hochul Calls for Nationwide Ban on ‘Assault Weapons’ in Wake of NYC Shooting
Hochul said, “I’m sitting in Midtown right now. My office is just a few blocks away and walking in this morning, and you see the security guards down there and everyone is just wondering, you know, is this is this a one-off? Could this happen again? I mean, that sense of security is shattered when someone comes from another state carrying an assault weapon designed only for battlefields, but using it, intending to use that to commit mayhem and mass murder in our cities.”
Hochul added, “If every state had the same laws uniformly, you could not have a situation where we fight really hard in the state of New York to make sure that we have the toughest gun laws in the nation. We have the lowest of all the large states homicide rate by guns. New York City, New York State, has the lowest homicide rate by guns in the nation for large states, and that’s because of laws that are working. We want that same sense of urgency to go out across the nation.”

Hochul Calls for Nationwide Ban on 'Assault Weapons' in Wake of NYC Shooting

Governor Kathy Hochul (D-NY) said Tuesday on CNN's "Inside Politics" that a new federal assault weapons ban is needed in the wake of a mass shooting in Manhattan. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

So... it's a day ending in "Y."

Deplorable Me · Wednesday at 12:08 AM

Dancing in the blood of the dead.

Cooolone · Wednesday at 12:48 AM

FYKH!

lrick · Wednesday at 3:31 AM

My residents?? I'm not YOUR resident.

That right there is the problem. That's exactly how they think. They own us.

If she truly gave a shit, she would restore the rights of people to self-defense.

Blame the so-called "assault" rifle instead....where was the national outcry over folding pocket knives this past weekend? And how was that attack stopped?

Stupid. And ugly.

S&W Fan · Wednesday at 6:28 AM

I wish some reporter with balls would ask Whorchul how it feels to wish in one hand and shit in the other.

Dr. Evil · Wednesday at 6:41 AM

I call for a nationwide ban on her.

MuttCat · Wednesday at 6:47 AM

Psychosis is a state of impaired reality, which may include hallucinations and delusions. It may occur due to an underlying psychotic disorder.

Runs deep with her.

Hochul Calls for Nationwide Ban on ‘Assault Weapons’ in Wake of NYC Shooting

20×102mm Vulcan