Recent content by Glock_USA

https://x.com/endwokeness/status/2021696482701619341?s=46 BREAKING: Canadian police reveal they are respecting the gunman's preferred gender pronouns. He transitioned at 12.

Again, they admitted to wrongdoing and agreed to pay out. Nothing to challenge here. The horse is out of the barn. They have already decided not to challenge this.

Mean Arms has to notify dealers that their products are illegal to sell in NY.

How can this be overturned? It's a settlement they agreed to. It's not a judgement against them.

Please don't post fake things. Thanks.

Worth reading. https://x.com/schwalm5132/status/2015470661490057540?s=46

My favorite part of this latest legally justified shooting is all of the anti-gunners now coming out in support of this guy carrying a gun. Up until now, they've all argued how nobody has the right to carry a gun to an assembly and that the type of gun he was carrying was only meant to inflict...

Good point. A lot of states have laws where if you participate in a crime and someone is killed, you are charged with their murder.

Chris Rock - How not to get your ass kicked by the police!

Why would he need a fair hearing in that city? They have no jurisdiction over a federal officer. This is why the latest headline that the feds aren't letting them in on the investigation is so funny. It's not a states matter. I do like how when Trump used the national guard he was literally...

A state cannot charge a federal officer if his actions were within the scope of his official duties. See the Supremacy Clause.

True, but a vehicle lunging towards you could definitely be deadly. Could have drove right over him.

The drivers side of the windshield. Where the person operating the vehicle was seated. Wouldn't make sense to fire in the center of the window and hit nothing. The car literally hit him in the legs. No time to get out of the path or he would have.

Her intent isn't what matters. What matters is if the officer perceived it to be a deadly threat in the moment.