Entirely possible that is the case. If so, then yeah they should absolutely downgrade the confidence of the intelligence, especially if they are the sole source. I'd still lean towards the lower chain though - It's typically easier to corrupt lower chain sources. That being said neither you...
It's almost certain the inside information we were getting is from different sources. Ie. The inside moles providing information on missiles are different moles than the ones giving nuclear progress.
Eh? The approach of, "they got this wrong so that means they got that wrong too", is simple. Covert intelligence is anything but simple. It doesn't mean you can just discard everything else because not enough information was gathered about one item. Should extra emphasis be placed on it...
History is written by the winners. I'm not proposing that the nazis were secretly the good guys. More pointing out that history does have a bias inherent in the fabric.
By that logic all math tests can only be scored 0% or 100%. There is no space for getting 1 question wrong on a battery of questions.
Not saying they aren't possibly farther along than known, but the logic that we got one thing wrong so throw everything else out doesn't hold.
Empty words from the mickey mouse club. They dont say they are going to do anything about it, they just "condemn" it.
Yes, I'm sure Iran is going to stop attacks dueing a war because someone wrote a letter saying they're bad.
I don't have any love for them, but it's always fair to be honest about your own side as well. If you won't criticize your own when deserved, then you have no ground to criticize anyone else either. I'm not siding with them in any way, but its fair to point out the shit we did as that does...
The US initiated it a long time ago. Turns out countries dont like when you fuck with their internal government and sovereignty. Who would have guessed?
The bad relationship began in 1953, when the C.I.A. engineered a coup to empower the shah as an absolute ruler by overthrowing Mohammad...
The NATO pact isn't about attacking other countries or forcing your will on them where all your allies are obligated to join in on the "fun". It's a defensive deterrent pact. The US attacked Iran, not the other way around.
Why? Last time I checked the UK, etc. didn't bomb Iran. That's why. Even my 8 year old knows that if you spill the milk, you clean it up.
If America has America first, why can't the UK have UK first? Is spending a bunch of money on a war they didn't want beneficial for them? Nope, so why...
Sometimes I wonder if she's legitimately retarded. Why would anyone move here to pay more taxes? She must be holed up in some sort of special education center while spewing that shit out.