This will backfire on them just like the warnings on cigarettes did. When they attempt to sue for cigarette damage, the first thing the defense points to is the warning on the box
You can thank the anti cop movement for that. Cops have paperwork ( actually on the computer now) on top of the ticket issued to fill out . And they want it filled out before the cop leaves the scene unless there is special reason not to do so then.
I was thinking more of pedestrian crossing the street or just someone opening their car door to get out of their car.
But a car turning onto a residential two way street could easily clip a car with one headlight without any criminality involved.
You are thinking from the point of view of the person driving the car. A second party might think it is a motorcycle and turn or move in front of that part that is not behind the working headlight. And yes, I have seen more than one MVA with that as the cause. A misjudging of the distance.
The reason is yes, they have show activity. A headlight is one that is fixable and it is dangerous just have one headlight.
Cops look for those because people can just get it fixed and not pay a fine . And they show activity
Who cares? He isn’t running . So what if she slept her way to the top too.
It’s her policy decisions and lack of competence that should be called into question. The lack of a straight answer on almost everything— “let’s have a conversation on that “ and say nothing meaningful for the next 29...
He didn’t make any pretense about that , in the movie. His mother and grandmother were the ones from there and the movie goes into that for about 10 minutes before it’s in suburbia.
His mother was a drug addict and abusive parent. He credits his grandmother with saving him. And she had guns...
Watch the movie. He doesn’t sugar coat that his family is from Kentucky but he grew up in suburban Ohio. It’s more of how his single mother was an addict