Rogue Soros-Funded NGO Plots Multi-City Assault On Tesla As Domestic Terrorism Escalates

Drinkthekoolaid · Mar 20, 2025

Can these guys be rounded up and sent to club gitmo already. Come on guys do it.

repete · Mar 20, 2025

livingston said:
Rogue Soros-Funded NGO Plots Multi-City Assault On Tesla As Domestic Terrorism Escalates
While the FBI investigates far-left terrorist attacks against Tesla service centers, showrooms, Supercharging networks, and vehicles, the radical Soros-funded non-profit Indivisible is preparing to launch a multi-city offensive against the American company in the coming days.

Anti-DEI crusader Robby Starbuck explained more about the rogue non-profit with Soros monies:

Over the next few days you're going to see an organized progressional protest effort at Tesla stores put together by a group called Indivisible.
George Soros foundation has given Indivisible nearly $8 million dollars for their "activism".

They're calling these "Tesla takedown" events and they're doing it in the midst of a domestic terror spree targeting Tesla and Tesla owners. They have these planned across the entire country. These images are just six examples.
The indivisible founders are Ezra Levin and his wife Leah Greenberg. They became "resistance" figures during Trump's first term and their work is celebrated by elected Democrats. So yeah, it's clear to me that the Democrats and their typical thugs are organizing this insanity.

Rogue Soros-Funded NGO Plots Multi-City Assault On Tesla As Domestic Terrorism Escalates | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Sorry bitch, I don't think you're going to get your birthday wish!

Dr. Evil · Mar 20, 2025

Criticalt · Mar 20, 2025

A guy who can catch a rocket with chopsticks, can probably make one hell of a security system for these dealers.
In states that allow you to protect your property with deadly force, he could come up with a truly terrifying device.

TEOTWAWKI inc. · Mar 20, 2025

Criticalt said:
A guy who can catch a rocket with chopsticks, can probably make one hell of a security system for these dealers.
In states that allow you to protect your property with deadly force, he could come up with a truly terrifying device.

I'd be impressed if he just caught them all with chopsticks (no limits on the "chop").

Criticalt · Mar 20, 2025

TEOTWAWKI inc. said:
I'd be impressed if he just caught them all with chopsticks (no limits on the "chop").

He could call it the Chip-chop-chippity-chopper.

pshift · Mar 21, 2025

They should hook these guys up to several Tesla Superchargers and have them 'ride the lightning'. I'm no fan of Elon Musk but they are going about it the wrong way.

REF · Mar 21, 2025

So I’m confused……. I thought it was about less emissions and saving the planet and doing the right thing for future generations? Oh, that only matters if the ones doing it are lefties and don’t associate or mingle with the Trump administration . Got it……… Fucking ding-dongs

FP1201 · Mar 21, 2025

In New York, under Penal Law Article 35, a person may use deadly physical force to prevent or terminate arson if they reasonably believe it's necessary, and this justification extends to defending premises and persons in the course of arson.
A search of NYPL leaves no ambiguity when it comes to arson.

Phazer · Mar 22, 2025

FP1201 said:
In New York, under Penal Law Article 35, a person may use deadly physical force to prevent or terminate arson if they reasonably believe it's necessary, and this justification extends to defending premises and persons in the course of arson.
A search of NYPL leaves no ambiguity when it comes to arson.

If you build a man a fire, you can keep him warm for an evening. If you set a man on fire, you keep him warm for the rest of his life.

- Unknown

Zerex · Mar 22, 2025

As mobs gather to burn down Tesla dealerships, it is time to arrest Soros for funding terrorism and to stop the mobs in their tracks.............molotov cocktail carriers, are a SWAT teams easiest target.
Rubber bullets, tear gas, bean bag rounds will allow deportation to Gitmo.

Saltwater60 · Mar 22, 2025

The best is Marrick Garland is no longer AG and the new one will likely not look the other way. Start popping some popcorn because it could get interesting

SonOfSun · Mar 22, 2025

Drinkthekoolaid said:
Can these guys be rounded up and sent to club gitmo already. Come on guys do it.

For what, having an opinion you disagree with? Protests are legal. If you don't like it, tough shit. You either believe in free speech, which includes protests or you don't. The idea and ability to have free speech is far more important than any idea a particular group espouses.

stokes · Mar 22, 2025

SonOfSun said:
For what, having an opinion you disagree with? Protests are legal. If you don't like it, tough shit. You either believe in free speech, which includes protests or you don't. The idea and ability to have free speech is far more important than any idea a particular group espouses.

So, its ok to firebomb cars and damage property in the name of protesting? WTF is wrong with you people?

SonOfSun · Mar 22, 2025

stokes said:
So, its ok to firebomb cars and damage property in the name of protesting? WTF is wrong with you people?

No. Where did I say that?

Protesting isn't causing property damage. I said I support the right of free speech and protesting.

protesting
noun
the expression of disapproval of or objection to something.

adjective
expressing disapproval of or objection to something.

ManualF150 · Mar 22, 2025

As much as I hate Tesla and EVs in general, I wouldn't stoop to destruction of property.

Protests, I'm all for. Go for it, make some noise!

stokes · Mar 22, 2025

SonOfSun said:
No. Where did I say that?

You said it right here.

SonOfSun said:
For what, having an opinion you disagree with? Protests are legal. If you don't like it, tough shit.

In response to drinkthekoolaid saying the domestic terrorists targeting Tesla should be sent to gitmo. Ok, so now tell me how you didnt say it.

SonOfSun · Mar 22, 2025

stokes said:
You said it right here.

In response to drinkthekoolaid saying the domestic terrorists targeting Tesla should be sent to gitmo. Ok, so now tell me how you didnt say it.

They are labeling anyone who protests as "domestic terrorists".

To be clear I'm not on board with burning cars or vandalizing property. I am 100% on board with people rights to walk around the dealerships with signs, to yell at or flip the bird to to people driving teslas, etc. One is speech, the other is destruction. There is a very clear line.

Personally I'm not going to be participating as I think it's stupid. However as long as their protests aren't destructive they are free to do things I think are stupid.

Drinkthekoolaid · Mar 22, 2025

SonOfSun said:
For what, having an opinion you disagree with? Protests are legal. If you don't like it, tough shit. You either believe in free speech, which includes protests or you don't. The idea and ability to have free speech is far more important than any idea a particular group espouses.

So you call conspiratorial organized terroristic crime a "difference of opinion"?

Not sure if that's how you think there's anything I can say to get you to see how wrong it is that there are foreign entities inciting and conspiring acts of domestic terrorism to cause political unrest.

stokes · Mar 22, 2025

SonOfSun said:
They are labeling anyone who protests as "domestic terrorists".

Where'd you get that from? I've only heard it said about the assholes vandalizing

Bigfoot · Mar 22, 2025

stokes said:
Where'd you get that from? I've only heard it said about the assholes vandalizing

^ THIS ^

Carlos Hathcock · Mar 22, 2025

Burning and destroying cars that were supposed to "save the environment".

Can't make up stupid shit like this.

stokes · Mar 22, 2025

SonOfSun said:
They are labeling anyone who protests as "domestic terrorists".

Typical libtard mentality, just make shit up, repeat it enough til it becomes so.

FP1201 · Mar 22, 2025

SonOfSun said:
For what, having an opinion you disagree with? Protests are legal. If you don't like it, tough shit. You either believe in free speech, which includes protests or you don't. The idea and ability to have free speech is far more important than any idea a particular group espouses.

Unless you're standing near an abortion clinic praying to God and begging potential patients from killing the unborn child they're carrying, then that's a no-go and People are to be arrested by swat teams.
Want to protest what you don't agree with; go for it....start destroying property and/or assaulting people then you've forfeited your Rights.
Shall yea fuck around, thou shalt find out.

Rogue Soros-Funded NGO Plots Multi-City Assault On Tesla As Domestic Terrorism Escalates

20×102mm Vulcan