Federal Judge Slams Brakes Limiting CDL & Illegals

Bigfoot

Bigfoot

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
17,868
Reaction score
46,429
Location
On the Trump Train
I thought SCOTUS had already ruled that federal judges have to stay in their own lane?



Edit - Found it, yes, they did, back in June of 2025. I thought so.

"On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., sharply curtailing the ability of federal courts to issue so-called “universal” or “nationwide” injunctions."
www.sidley.com

Supreme Court Substantially Limits Universal Injunctions (Trump v. CASA): Implications for Litigation Against the Government

www.sidley.com www.sidley.com


Or is this situation not the same thing? IDK
 
Last edited:
tirwin1

tirwin1

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
17,436
Reaction score
48,259
Location
rochester
Bigfoot said:
I thought SCOTUS had already ruled that federal judges have to stay in their own lane?



Edit - Found it, yes, they did, back in June of 2025. I thought so.

"On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., sharply curtailing the ability of federal courts to issue so-called “universal” or “nationwide” injunctions."
www.sidley.com

Supreme Court Substantially Limits Universal Injunctions (Trump v. CASA): Implications for Litigation Against the Government

www.sidley.com www.sidley.com


Or is this situation not the same thing? IDK
Click to expand...
Lawfare. It doesn't matter what the supreme court said. The delays and process is designed to be political warfare. They know the roberts led court doesn't have the balls to start punishing judges that defy them. Roberts is a pussy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top