Ex-CIA official to Trump supporter: We're done. Get out!

his qualifications for getting in the CIA was the fact he had a MA in english literature and speaks French.

CNN's Unhinged Philip Mudd Snarls 'Dirtbag' at Trump
Can anybody remember a time in the past year when CNN's counterterrorism analyst Philip Mudd did not become completely unhinged? When he isn't hurling racial epithets around he has threatened harm upon President Donald Trump. In his latest madman incarnation, Mudd shocked even the CNN Newsroom host John Berman on Thursday morning by snapping that Trump is a "dirtbag."

While watching the following video, just note the absolute hate that seems to pour out of not only Mudd's snarling mouth but also his eyes, the very windows to a seemingly twisted soul:
CNN's Unhinged Philip Mudd Snarls 'Dirtbag' at Trump

These folks would certainly be denied a CC permit here in NY State .If a judge ever saw these videos ...

tirwin1 said:

It is quite clear to anyone who has been paying attention that there is a group of people in the FBI/DOJ that actively conspired to remove trump from office. I assume there are players from the CIA involved that have not been mentioned or caught (yet). Astonishing, unprecedented and ultimately quite worrisome. Trump is far from perfect. I can understand the resistance. What I don't understand is the active measures to remove him. He's not a lunatic, he's not a nazi and he isn't a moron. So why would career govt officials actively work to remove him? Clearly he threatens the status quo but I sense it is more than that. I just can't figure out why.

Click to expand...

He is destroying the deep state .We have a uniparty in Washington .Trump is not part of the group. As a business man ... Very few successful businesses have a lot of waste ...Unless they have government contracts. Trump is slashing regulations ... The government controls you by regulations .

According to judges, Trump is bound by Obama, not the law and the Constitution.
Another day, another federal judge demanding that Trump continue an unlawful, discretionary policy of the Obama administration. Yesterday, South Carolina District Judge David Norton, a George W. Bush appointee, ruled that the Trump administration didn’t offer proper notice when it countermanded Obama’s “Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule.” Consequently, he is mandating that the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers continue regulating private property that contains streams, pools, and drainage ditches as commercial waters, in contravention of law.
Regulate your drainage ditch?


The Clean Water Act granted the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers power to regulate navigable waters, which, to anyone who understands English, means large bodies of water that are used for transport by ships. In June 2015, as part of a series of lawless abuses of the Clean Water and Clean Air acts, President Obama unilaterally expanded the definition of “navigable waters” to include any seasonal stream of water that might run through private property as part of federal jurisdiction subject to water regulations.

Commercial ships and barges do not use streams and drainage ditches in farmland, yet with the stroke of a pen, Obama subjected them to cumbersome federal regulations that increased the burden for permitting needed for land development and even hurt existing landowners with threats of fines for what they do with their drainage on their own land. Under the rule, any low-lying area that could collect seasonal water could be subject to water regulations preventing farmers, ranchers, and foresters from operating certain equipment or bringing dirt, gravel, pesticides, and fertilizer into the area.

Amid the clamor by the political class for “criminal justice reform,” aka jailbreak for violent drug traffickers, gun felons, and even murderers, it is regulatory crimes like this that need real reform. To that end, last June, Trump’s EPA decided to countermand Obama’s WOTUS rule and revert back to the commonsense definition of navigable waters that had been in place since 1980. The suspension rule was published in the Federal Register on February 6, 2018, but was subject to an immediate lawsuit by the professional litigator class.

According to judges, Trump is bound by Obama, not the law and the Constitution

According to judges, Trump is bound by Obama, not the law and the Constitution.

The above link . for what I posted . Under the new Obama rule I believe a wet land is defined as any land that has standing water on it for a period of 5 days. A friend was bush hogging a 3 acre field that the government says he needed to build a house . (more government regs ) DEC showed up and said a stretch of his property 50 ft wide going the length of his property could not be mowed as some cattails were growing on it ... Wetland ...Said they will fine him if he ever does it again ... His property looks like crap now ... Just government overreach and we get another government employee that our taxes have to support.

ECU Pirates said:

I would not take that guys advice on anything. Yank his clearance. He’s a lunatic.

Click to expand...

And how many thousands more are there in Albany and Washington just like him making rules and regulations against the American people ....