Mother may lose her mixed race child over rock painted like confederate flag

“Given that the child is of mixed race, it would seem apparent that the presence of the flag is not in the child’s best interests, as the mother must encourage and teach the child to embrace her mixed race identity, rather than thrust her into a world that only makes sense through the tortured lens of cognitive dissonance,”

The courts are engaging in back alley psychology through the lens of "wokesterism" - the only "cognitive dissonance" I see is in the infantile behavior of the court.

"...teach the child to embrace her mixed race identity,..." - sounds like eugenics to me. Didn't Nazis like eugenics?


But, it IS Ithaca............

No problem though with all of the houses I've seen with "Black Lives Matter" signs on their property for all to see and what that stands for.

Big government know it all Karen's with power.

Dr. Evil said:

No problem though with all of the houses I've seen with "Black Lives Matter" signs on their property for all to see and what that stands for.

Click to expand...

^^^ This ^^^

Confederate blacks?

So, this rock is absolutely not a distasteful object.

The Confederate flag is Not distasteful.

What is distasteful is the court and this asshole judge interfering into this.

Snatching a woman's daughter from her because of a fucking rock that is painted? What a freaken joke.

If the father had a bLM sign at his place of residence would that be ordered taken down as well?

This has gone beyond full retard!~

GOPerfect said:

So, this rock is absolutely not a distasteful object.

The Confederate flag is Not distasteful.

What is distasteful is the court and this asshole judge interfering into this.

Snatching a woman's daughter from her because of a fucking rock that is painted? What a freaken joke.

If the father had a bLM sign at his place of residence would that be ordered taken down as well?

This has gone beyond full retard!~

Click to expand...

This is why qualified immunity for government officials needs to go.

This woman should be able to sue this judge (in a sane court) personally for violating her civil rights.

She should own his house over this.

But she will never get justice. At least not from within this system.

GOPerfect said:

So, this rock is absolutely not a distasteful object.

The Confederate flag is Not distasteful.

What is distasteful is the court and this asshole judge interfering into this.

Snatching a woman's daughter from her because of a fucking rock that is painted? What a freaken joke.

If the father had a bLM sign at his place of residence would that be ordered taken down as well?

This has gone beyond full retard!~

Click to expand...

They've gone

It's a custody battle for the kid. Both sides will throw all kinds of shit at each other trying to make something stick.

All rocks are pragmatically distasteful, but not because they have a flag painted on them. Is the presence of the rock in violation of any law? I think not, or they would have chosen a more strongly worded statement than “its continued presence shall constitute a change in circumstances,”. This isn't logical

libertysnake said:

How a confederate flag painted on a rock could cost a mom her kid

A New York upstate woman has been told she needs to ditch a driveway decoration painted with a confederate flag or risk losing custody of her mixed race child — even though a family court jud…

nypost.com

So, I agree the rock is distasteful. However, distasteful is not the business of the government. They can fuck right off with trying to enforce bullshit like this.

The government is always overstepping its domain.

Click to expand...

Dangerous decision by the judge.
As a Black man, the mother sounds like a nightmare to have impregnated and be sharing a kid with. And I feel sorry for the poor kid. The cognitive dissonance bit is a real concern but this "confederate" rock shouldn't be the deciding factor in the custody case. A dangerous precedent is being set.