Meager or not, you are exactly right. Depending on the decision of SCOTUS though my guess is it will significantly accelerate the 2nd Circuits review if vacation of the stay is granted or slow it even more.
This is correct. As is the Hardaway PI for places of worship. Just a guess but this approach of decisions per restriction in the law, one at a time, may be the best. Antonyuk was a decision finding many aspects unconstitutional. The 2nd only needs to doubt, or be concerned about one aspect...
I have been watching the cases and while Antonyuk has been stayed by the 2nd Circuit I have not seen a response from them on the appeal and request for stay on either of the Sinatra decisions. So...places of worship (Hardaway v Negrelli) and private property (Christian v Negrelli) I think are...
I am very disappointed in the concession it appears GOA is making. Disgusted actually! Is this a matter of get a little now go for more after? There is a severability clause...why the hell would they not as for a ruling on all? Are we dealing with "Standing" again? And request for another...
I have been looking for this sinage locally an have found nothing. The requirement to post was not well publicized and I suspect most business owners don't know the decision right bestowed upon them.
I am so confused on the lack of standing. I get Antonyuk may not have standing with regard to the application for permit since he has one already. However, with regard to sensitive locations, I think he did have standing. What am I missing?