DOJ ACCIDENTALLY DESTROYS THEIR OWN "ASSAULT WEAPON" ARGUMENT....PROOF HERE

[livingston]

DOJ ACCIDENTALLY DESTROYS THEIR OWN "ASSAULT WEAPON" ARGUMENT....PROOF HERE​

During US Supreme Court oral argument in US v. Rahimi, Biden's Department of Justice made a major admission that once a court performs the historical analogue analysis, which in turns gives rise to a legal test or legal principle in a particular type of Second Amendment challenge (such as arms ban challenges), then future courts need not re-perform that historical "spade work." Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner explains why this is such a great concession for future arms ban cases.

 

[livingston]

From the comments section above

@ericsfishingadventures4433​

3 hours ago
I actually listened to the oral arguments and it seems the justices were testing this out for cases that are upcoming, Clarence Thomas and alitos questions were quite telling.