and legal if you are on the Epstein listTherefore child rape is now the norm.
Trump was elected to clean house.Why only Epstein? Why do you think Americans are so fixated on ONE person, ONE place?
Nothing is free. We are paying for it. Only free to the people that dont pay taxes.Everything is FREEEeee!
Either a deal was made (passage of the big beautiful bill) or a threat was made.![]()
Why Is Trump Taking The Fall?
BECOME A MEMBER:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLdP3jmBYe9lAZQbY6OSYjw/joinFOLLOW OUR NEW CHANNELS:Benny On The Block: https://www.youtube.com/@UC4c9dTJByi...www.youtube.com
THIS! ^^^^^^^^^ A gazillion times, THIS!A problem I see with releasing that list is that unless there is evidence of them doing something illegal on that island, merely being there is not a crime and would leave a lot of people open to being persecuted for something they may not have done. Would open a big liability issue.
When your first paragraph happens this country might wake up and stop electing the same morons that do this. Until then nothing will change. That point could be a bad tipping point or turn out for the better, time will tell.Yes we care. It's a huge problem if this goes to pass with no accountability. The loss of faith in government and the justice system will be at the point of reaching irreconcilable differences and a huge portion of America will never trust government again nor believe the justice department has any credibility at all.
This one singular event will determine if many millions of Americans believe we are a rule of law country, or we have become some sort of an irrefutable quasi banana Republic - techno oligarchy where the deep state is too embedded and too much of an immovable object through the ballot box.
Problem with the morons voting for the morons is that they are all thoroughly brainwashed. Ever notice that they have become severely extreme, radical and the problem has become so widespread over the last 10 or so years? Seems to me it coincides with the rise of smart phone and social media use. I've said it before, back in the 60's they banned putting subliminal messages in tv ads because it was a form of brainwashing. So with that lo tech gear they could brainwash you, imagine what they can do with all these phone zombies with the newer tech? And does anybody think that when they banned it in the 60's that the CIA, etc stopped developing it?When your first paragraph happens this country might wake up and stop electing the same morons that do this. Until then nothing will change. That point could be a bad tipping point or turn out for the better, time will tell.
THIS! ^^^^^^^^^ A gazillion times, THIS!
Its pretty phuckin easy to accuse someone of something.
I`m not saying they didn`t do anything wrong, nore am i saying they did, but ya better have the phucking proof!
Good article. I've been suspecting the same thing.![]()
The Jeffrey Epstein Case Is Far Bigger Than Jeffrey Epstein
On Tuesday, President Trump took umbrage at a question about the Justice Department’s assertion that there are no Epstein tapes, there is no client list, and there is nothing more to be released. The Twitterverse has been brutal towards AG Pam ...www.americanthinker.com
The Jeffrey Epstein Case Is Far Bigger Than Jeffrey Epstein
For the most part I reluctantly agree, except for the part about making arrangements for the actual guilty to meet God. Make no mistake , the truly guilty will Not be meeting God.I've a few bullet points floating around in that I haven't yet articulated:
First off, everyone is innocent until proved guilty, and simply Flying on a Private Jet to the Island does not rise to the level of criminal conviction.
There is the illegality and reprehensible trauma (to most) who would have to endure the AV assault committed, and since it's illegal to make, have, or view then to me it's hard to figure out how a Jury of peers is going to sit through that evidence to find for the defendant.
Bondi did say those Tapes would never see the light of day, a statement that can easily have several contexts.
The "Black Book" is damning evidence, however a good(sic) Lawyer could argue that name was falsely written, or done so as a reference, with no crime or evidence of one...I dare say anyone on "the list" will have enough money and obvious need to hire the best legal team they could and conversely the Government would have to bring it's A-Game with an enormous Team of it's own...It's hard enough to build a case against a shit-bag with no resources, and you want to bring a wealthy and prominent name to Trial on life imprisoning charges....yea, that isn't going to be easy and less likely successful.
So vile are the allegations of what happened there, no one should have any reservations about arranging a meeting with God for them, but we've got to make sure we've got the right person, the right crime, and the necessary proof, and the poor bastards that have to bear witness to the process may themselves never be right or the same again.
Rumor has it, today, that trump is looking to pardon Epstein's old lady. Would that sound like a "here shut up an go away" plan ?Well, they did originally say they had collected tons of video and photographic evidence. If that's the case, and that evidence still exists, they should go after people based on that evidence. As stated elsewhere, if Epstein and Maxwell were convicted of trafficking young girls, they did it for other people. Those people should pay for their crimes.
Judgement?For the most part I reluctantly agree, except for the part about making arrangements for the actual guilty to meet God. Make no mistake , the truly guilty will Not be meeting God.