FOIA Release of McCabe Memo Highlights Much More Than Rosenstein’s “Wear a Wire” Controversy…

[livingston]

FOIA Release of McCabe Memo Highlights Much More Than Rosenstein’s “Wear a Wire” Controversy…

A Judicial Watch FOIA Lawsuit has resulted in the release of a May 16, 2017, memo written by then Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe. [Link Here] The media is currently focusing on the aspect where Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein is outlined as willing to wear a wire into the Oval Office to record the President; however, the memo content actually reveals much more.
There are three aspects to this McCabe memo that warrant attention: (1) Rosenstein’s willingness to wear a wire. (2) Evidence that Rosenstein took Mueller into the White House on May 16, 2017, as a set-up to interview Mueller’s pending target; and (3) the CURRENT redactions to the memo indicate CURRENT efforts by the CURRENT AG Bill Barr to protect a corrupt endeavor that encompasses Rod Rosenstein. While all three aspects are alarming; the last aspect is concerning in the extreme.

FOIA Release of McCabe Memo Highlights Much More Than Rosenstein’s “Wear a Wire” Controversy…

 

[livingston]

From the comments section..
Uncle Max says:
September 24, 2019 at 12:23 am


And these jerk forced/ demanded that Sessions recuse himself… and allow the most conflicted people to be in charge of their own scheme….. and none of the ” good folks ” at DOJ said bumpkis. All these career DOJ folks, milling around and being consulted on Sessions must recuse… and yet by doing so, hand the whole package nicely right into the hands of the ” team “. Nice.

LikeLiked by 3 people

Reply

• 
  Dutchman says:
  September 24, 2019 at 12:37 am
  U.M.,
  The people telling Sessions to recuse WERE active participants in the coup.
  They handed it to THEMSELVES.
  
  And Mueller was the one that was ready to accept the SC job “right way”; he was NOT a ‘figurehead’, he was a willing participant, eager even.
  
  And his Oval Office visit was the,start of the investigation, even before formally appointed.
  

 

[livingston]

Garrison Hall says:
September 24, 2019 at 1:41 am


I think the entirety of the federal government is in revolt against DJT. For decades there’s been an “insider culture” (AKA “Deep State”) that has operated in sync with the UniParty. As the bureaucracies gained more and more power under decades of progressive politics, loyalties slowly shifted away from service the American people to remaining loyal to the bureaucracy itself. Although corrupt this cozy arrangement has gone on for years and years . . . until it was existentially challenged by DJT’s open populism and obvious distrust of and even contempt for DC politics. That the president actually represents the conservative insurrection that elected him instead of the progressive bureaucracies is even more disturbing. Basically, the president is dealing with a federal government that sees itself as representing the true path of the nation . . . and not him . . . and not us.

 

[BDinPutnam]

Always fascinating when "reporters" can magically discern (1) what is underneath a redaction and (2) the rationale and deep spooky conspiracy behind the application of said redactions.

The "everybody I hire is out to get me" routine is getting really, really, REALLY old.

As I once said to a gal I was breaking up with- "it's not me. Its YOU."

 

[tirwin1]

Always fascinating when "reporters" can magically discern (1) what is underneath a redaction and (2) the rationale and deep spooky conspiracy behind the application of said redactions.

The "everybody I hire is out to get me" routine is getting really, really, REALLY old.

As I once said to a gal I was breaking up with- "it's not me. Its YOU."

After reading it I would say it is informed speculation - particularly when he brings in the timeline. I have been going to that website for a number of months and I think whoever is behind it has their act together.

Whether Barr's investigation leads to indictments or not, I think all of the documents associated with this sad spectacle need to be released in full, without redactions.

 

[kev74]

Always fascinating when "reporters" can magically discern (1) what is underneath a redaction and (2) the rationale and deep spooky conspiracy behind the application of said redactions.

The "everybody I hire is out to get me" routine is getting really, really, REALLY old.

As I once said to a gal I was breaking up with- "it's not me. Its YOU."

If it was a "news" outlet that didn't have a pretty good track record, I'd agree with you. These guys have been on point so far.