Governor Cuomo to Throw More Than $13.3 Million at Gun Violence

[Catskillkid]

This Gun Control State Just Dedicated $13.3 Million in Funding to Help Combat Gun Violence

Prince Andrew, 1st Lord of Douchebaggery, strikes again. Wasn't the SAFE Act enough? Where is this $13 million going towards and who exactly is paying for it?

That's hypothetical. It's going toward removing firearms from law abiding citizens and you and I and every tax paying citizen is footing the bill.

 

[GOYABEAN]

 

[dsdmmat]

But we has the safe act there ain't no gun violence in the evil Empire State.

 

[tirwin1]

meh. There are no specifics. Money and training for what exactly? Just another soundbite to keep his rep as an "anti gun" politician going. Just another excuse to write FUAC.

 

[Catskillkid]

meh. There are no specifics. Money and training for what exactly? Just another soundbite to keep his rep as an "anti gun" politician going. Just another excuse to write FUAC.

Thanks, tirwin1, I almost forgot....

 

[C3D]

Stunningly enough none of the gun violence is from the law abiding citizens who took time to comply with the SAFE Act.

 

[MothMan]

From link..

In Monroe County, the Rochester Police Department and District Attorney’s Office, Sheriff’s Office and Probation Department will share $1,744,060.

So whose getting paid off in Monroe County??

Onondaga is on the list of participating counties that gets money. So that would be DA Fitzpatrick being remembered for his part in the non-investigation into legislative corruption.

 

[Jmac00]

Governor Cuomo did not specify where the $13.3 million in funding to combat gun violence would be coming from in this morning’s announcement

geee, anyone want to guess who will pay for this, along with the $10M for the Liberty Defense fund. There goes $23 million dollars of taxpayer money.

Im guessing Cuomo has a money printing press in the basement of his Manhattan office

 

[Bob]

So whose getting paid off in Monroe County??

The coppers. Most of it is going to OT for targeted patrols.

 

[carpediem]

Wow. This kind of shit makes him a star among the liberals. His extra-constitutional act was to have stopped gun crime in its' tracks. Yet, here we are demanding more money for yet more gun crime. Liberals are so retarded that they don't get the simplest of scenarios.
Person "A" commits a gun crime. Person "A" is given a little jail time and is released. Liberals pass a law banning scary guns. Person "B" becomes an instant felon by owning a scary gun that isn't registered. Person "A" commits yet another gun crime. Person "A" is given another short sentence and released.
Person "B" is caught with the scary gun. He is given a couple years in jail and heavy fines. Liberals say the ban on scary guns is a success because Person "B" got caught, their first ever infraction of the law. Meanwhile, Person "A" commits another gun crime. This time they kill someone.
Then the idiot who passed the scary gun ban says gun crime is still an issue and needs $ to cut down on it. Seems as though the scary gun ban is doing what it is designed to do, target those who don't commit crimes other than own scary guns.
Now, the idiot who banned the scary guns needs another way to blame all the people like Person "B" for the issues caused by Person "A" because Person "A" happens to be a minority and you can't possibly blame them for gun violence. So, it is time for the idiot to concoct yet another meaningless restriction to apply to people not of the criminal class to show people how he cares about the people who really matter to him.

 

[JamieZ]

He is spending all this money on gun control but I dont remember hearing about what he did with all that money he had put aside for the ammo background check system. That was a shit load.

 

[Bigfoot]

FUAC!!!! ----- That's my well thought out contribution for this evening ----- FUAC!!!

 

[Acer-m14]

I thinks we need a march ... this is getting way out of control ..

starts loading .223 with FFFg or maybe FFFFg black powder .. my new musket ..

 

[Grimscale]

The Message of Necessity implied that something HAD to be done RIGHT NOW to end gun violence.
Now, 4 years later, he wants MORE money to "end gun violence".

This whole thing is starting to sound like a big, political fraud scheme.
As a taxpayer, I would like an itemized and detailed report explaining exactly where each and every dollar is spent, with comments by the Tyrant stating what the purpose of that spending is supposed to accomplish.
Failure to supply this info results in NO money for FUAC or any of his agendas. And if his pattern of corruption continues, he should face a judge.

 

[Madmallard]

Don't forget the 18 plus billion in the newly passed budget for the unSAFE Act.

 

[pjzwtl]

What a dick...FUAC

 

[BerettaGuy]

"Gun Violence" Blame the gun not the douche bag that uses the gun to do violence.
Opioid Epidemic Blame the drug and the doctors that prescribe the drug not the shitbums that use the drug illegally.
Teen Pregnancy Blame the fetus not the teenage boy who can't control himself and just has to have it.
Trump victory - Blame the Russians, not your own misguided progressiveness.
It is the "progressive" way. Who allows this to happen. The Progressive Media.

Cuomo, who has previously suggested Democrats shut down the government to force action on gun violence, is a staunch supporter of the Brady Campaign (his sister Maria Cuomo Cole is on the board) and a bonafide mafioso in the gun control movement.

WELL WELL WELL. His brother is on CNN and his sister is a Brady Bunch.

 

[speedkills27]

Why are you all upset? This is typical liberal governing
1- Make a bad law stepping on the freedom of citizens in the name safety
2- Bad law does not work
3- Double down on bad law because "the original wasn't strong enough" and "its for the kids"

 

[Jmac00]

when they going to pass a Crime control Bill, instead of a Gun control bill?

 

[Bob]

when they going to pass a Crime control Bill, instead of a Gun control bill?

Like the one they just passed, RAISING the age of criminal responsibility for most crimes? Surely the kid who shot Tony DiPonzio (I refuse to use his name) could not comprehend the gravity of his actions at such a young age.

 

[prambo]

Waiting for @Podmonkey. Enjoy his posts about The Princess.

 

[Uzi]

The answer is still so clear. Absolutely no need to be confused or break apart any of this into detail. They're out to get our guns. They want more control. Plain and simple. They need some sort of excuse each time for the erosion of a right that shall not be infringed. Don't bother asking yourself why it doesn't make sense and how you know that it does not prevent gun violence.

A more important focus is when the tipping point is reached and explaining it to sheep that just aren't too bright. Pushing this on a federal level would actually be quite beneficial because it would cause civil unrest to a degree and retaliation with rioting, protests in every city in the entire nation until changes are repealed at a federal level. There are too many gun owners in the united states and a flip of the switch might be what we need. My main focus would be where I'm presiding though. We need massive rallies in all major upstate NY cities, maybe even worth a try in NYC too.

 

[Criticalt]

Wow. This kind of shit makes him a star among the liberals. His extra-constitutional act was to have stopped gun crime in its' tracks. Yet, here we are demanding more money for yet more gun crime. Liberals are so retarded that they don't get the simplest of scenarios.
Person "A" commits a gun crime. Person "A" is given a little jail time and is released. Liberals pass a law banning scary guns. Person "B" becomes an instant felon by owning a scary gun that isn't registered. Person "A" commits yet another gun crime. Person "A" is given another short sentence and released.
Person "B" is caught with the scary gun. He is given a couple years in jail and heavy fines. Liberals say the ban on scary guns is a success because Person "B" got caught, their first ever infraction of the law. Meanwhile, Person "A" commits another gun crime. This time they kill someone.
Then the idiot who passed the scary gun ban says gun crime is still an issue and needs $ to cut down on it. Seems as though the scary gun ban is doing what it is designed to do, target those who don't commit crimes other than own scary guns.
Now, the idiot who banned the scary guns needs another way to blame all the people like Person "B" for the issues caused by Person "A" because Person "A" happens to be a minority and you can't possibly blame them for gun violence. So, it is time for the idiot to concoct yet another meaningless restriction to apply to people not of the criminal class to show people how he cares about the people who really matter to him.

Post of the week, maybe the year!!
Even though a staunch liberal would NEVER admit it, even they would read this post and say, "wow, hes right!!"