Robin
.475 A&M Magnum
Generally, that applies to, anything.
Robin
Robin
and lastly
4) THE OP LEGIT ASKED WHY HE SHOULDNT GET A .40SW, THATS IN THE FUCKING TITLE OF THE THREAD. ITS FUCKING IDIOTIC TO SIT THERE AND SAY OH DONT BE A LOUD MOUTH BY SAYING WHY HE SHOULDNT BUY THIS SHITTY ASS STUPID ROUND WHEN THATS EXACTLY WHAT HE ASKED, INSTEAD MAKE UP FAKE BULL SHIT ARGUMENTS ON WHY HE ACTUALLY SHOULD BUY IT..
Again resorting to stupid graphics and childish name-calling...and people wonder why gun forums have such a bad reputation.
The OP seems pretty interested in getting a .40s&w, as he has said he is already looking at specific pistols. I interpret that to mean he is set on the cartridge, he just wants to find a suitable pistol.
But, he should listen to you of course...he shouldn't buy anything that was designed in the 1990's or earlier because it sucks, and he shouldn't get .40s&w because it's no longer a relevant cartridge.
It's amazing how much the internet experts know...if we could just get people like you assigned to cancer research, we'd have a cure in mere minutes.
Truebeliever, I am retired too and have to budget my money as well. I just don't see maintenance on a .40 as anything more extraordinary than any other firearm. Maybe I have been lucky but in all my years, the only gun that required something beyond my own ability to fix was a Springfield Armory rifle, which turned out to be a simple fix, but a tad beyond my understanding at the time. As stated previously, I have fired thousands of rounds through my .40 and other than simple cleaning, I have never had a problem. Of course my good fortune with the .40 is only anecdotal. Is their something that shows the .40 is more susceptible to failure through usage than other similar calibers?
Robin
So far it was just a spring for me. Replaced the spring and it was good to go. But a lot of departments are switching to the 9 in large part to maintaince issues.Truebeliever, I am retired too and have to budget my money as well. I just don't see maintenance on a .40 as anything more extraordinary than any other firearm. Maybe I have been lucky but in all my years, the only gun that required something beyond my own ability to fix was a Springfield Armory rifle, which turned out to be a simple fix, but a tad beyond my understanding at the time. As stated previously, I have fired thousands of rounds through my .40 and other than simple cleaning, I have never had a problem. Of course my good fortune with the .40 is only anecdotal. Is their something that shows the .40 is more susceptible to failure through usage than other similar calibers?
Robin
I'm a horder (whoreder) by nature. Its a sickness. Have always wheeled and dealed to feed my hobbies.
Paintball? Sure. I had 18 guns and enough gear to outfit 5 people.
RC car racing. Yep. 2wd buggy 4wd buggy, 2wd truck, 4wd truck 2 or 3 classes of carpet racing cars. not to mention spare parts.
Sold all that stuff and now I'm a gun guy.
I noticed that I had a box of 40 S&W ammo...just in case.
Now I have it stuck in my head i needa pistol to go with it.
Is there any valid reason not to get a 40?
Any guns to avoid due to the power of a 40?
I read som first gen stuff could not handle it.
I fully admit that like buying/ having stuff as much or more than actually using it.
Just thinking that a 40 may not be a bad thing to have around....just in case.
Here you go @PbTargetShot a Glock 22 this afternoon.
I could tell I wasn't shooting a 9 but it was fine.
If I find a good deal, I'll get a .40 but wont aggressively hunt for one.
Nice! I picked up a VP9 at the same time as well, must be a 9&40 sale going on somewhere. My mags cost 42 each though . I will eventually get to the point where I have 7 for each gun but, not this year.I ordered a Ruger SR9 & matching Ruger SR40.
I have 3 extra SR40 mags from Ebay ( $20 shipped for all 3).
I paid $300.88 shipped for the 40 ( Targetsportsusa) . I figured, hell its cheap enough and has good reviews....so why not?
First time I had the pistols out. I wanted to see how they ran. These are the first HK guns I have owned.I would say both targets are dead.
View attachment 34777 View attachment 34778
Top is my HK VP 9 bottom is my HK VP 40 both are mag dumps at 10 yards. 2 mags of 9 and 3 mags of 40
I normally carry a 1911 in 45. Still don’t completely trust striker fired guns yet, maybe one day in the future but for the moment 8 rounds of 45 is adequate.
That's like throwing up the @Willjr75 signal!I normally carry a 1911 in 45. Still don’t completely trust striker fired guns yet, maybe one day in the future but for the moment 8 rounds of 45 is adequate.
That's a myth. A .40 will out-penetrate a .45 ACP through hard barriers but in soft tissue it behaves the same as a 9mm if using premium 9mm ammunition.I like .40ncaliber handguns. The .40 was designed to replicate the stopping power of the .45ACP with the capacity of a 9mm. It compromises in both factors, but I think it does it well. That we can carry a G27 with 9 + 1 .40 caliber bullets is quite extraordinary when compared to a Colt Commander in heft and size.
That's a myth. A .40 will out-penetrate a .45 ACP through hard barriers but in soft tissue it behaves the same as a 9mm if using premium 9mm ammunition.