Thanks. That was a great article. I appreciate the thought.Here is an interesting review of the SW22.
I believe S&W fixed the problem. I ordered the updated screws anyway. Thanks.I picked one up 6+ years ago - heavy AF but very accurate. Not sure if they fixed it since then but the Nylok takedown screw can work it's way out, S&W had an improved one they sent me for free but I ended up getting a 5/32" hex one on eBay, this listing looks like the one(s) I got, worked well. (Actually, I checked my e-mails, that's the same seller I used in 2017, good to go!)
I don't think I've shot my Victory since I bought a Taurus TX22 though, ha.
Personally, I don't think that either the S&W SW22 Victory or the Ruger 22/45 Mark IV are particularly nice looking, but the S&W 617? I like it!I don’t own one but I’ve handled and shot one on several occasions. Nice little shooters for sure but…. God damn they’re butt ugly. They’re probably one of the ugliest guns S&W makes.
Just curious,- has anyone ever seen a revolver like this threaded to accept a suppressor? It should have the front sight moved back, of course. Anybody have any pictures of a modified one?Personally, I don't think that either the S&W SW22 Victory or the Ruger 22/45 Mark IV are particularly nice looking, but the S&W 617? I like it! View attachment 205146
I have one those too. Great revolver. I also have a Dan Wesson .22 revolver. I just purchased the Speed Beez reloading tray for the 617.Personally, I don't think that either the S&W SW22 Victory or the Ruger 22/45 Mark IV are particularly nice looking, but the S&W 617? I like it! View attachment 205146
Just curious,- has anyone ever seen a revolver like this threaded to accept a suppressor? It should have the front sight moved back, of course. Anybody have any pictures of a modified one?
That would be nice to not have brass laying all around the range floor after being ejected from a semi auto .22 pistol like my Ruger 22/45.
When I take my 617 to the range, I take my Speed Beez reloading setup (like shown in attached picture). Saves time and I don’t end up picking up brass from all over the place. View attachment 205213
Suppressor on a revolver? Doesn't work so well: the barrel/cylinder gap allows the gas to dump out (exaggerated with a can), kinda defeats the purpose and makes for a nasty stream of gas blowing out of the gap. (Exception being something like the Nagant revolver.)
The article linked to this post seems to be the basis of your argument. Maybe?
Can Revolvers Have Silencers/Suppressors? What You Need to Know
In action movies, silencers are effective tools for muffling gunfire, and making escape easier after a weapon is fired. While we’ve all seen actors use a pistol with a silencer, …neckbonearmory.com
Nevertheless, I am still wondering about this idea. One of the reasons this intrigues me is because I am pretty familiar with noise, or more specifically Sound Power Level data from my work with industrial machinery, and its' effect on our hearing. SPL noises are directional. I would venture that the sound emanating at 90 degrees from a miniscule gap between the cylinder and the forcing cone is minor in comparison to that traveling straight down the barrel, and exiting the muzzle end of the barrel of the revolver where a suppressor would be mounted. And I doubt that the minimal added pressure drop from a suppressor is enough to cause a significantly higher sound discharge from that gap of only a few thousandths of an inch between the cylinder and the cone.
I don't have the necessary equipment to test it, and that is why I am curious to know if others have actually done that.