sooooo......what does that have to do with this case?"we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war.” Judge Robert B. King wrote that weapons of war are most useful in the military and the previous Supreme Court ruling on District of Columbia vs. Heller excluded these kinds of weapons from being protected by the Second Amendment.
Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, who concurred with King, focused on the state’s responsibility to protect their citizens, writing, “it is their community, not ours. It is their safety not ours. It is their lives, not ours.”
I dare anyone to take a "modern sporting rifle" and hand to anyone in the military and see what happens. My bet is they will hand it back to you and tell you to shove it. it won't work on the battlefield.
Most civilian AR's are actually better. They have free-float handguards, 2 stage triggers, better stocks, ect. The only thing missing is 3 round burst or full auto which is rarely used by a rifleman.I dare anyone to take a "modern sporting rifle" and hand to anyone in the military and see what happens. My bet is they will hand it back to you and tell you to shove it. it won't work on the battlefield.