Military courts could order ‘red flag’ gun confiscation under defense bill

[livingston]

Military courts could order ‘red flag’ gun confiscation under defense bill​

A provision in the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act would allow military courts to issue protective orders that include “Red Flag” gun confiscation, according to the more than 1,300-page bill.

In the legislation, those beholden to the United States Code of Military Justice could be issued a “military court protective order” by a military judge or magistrate, which would make “possessing, receiving, or otherwise accessing a firearm” illegal.


“A military court protective order issued on an ex parte basis shall restrain a person from possessing, receiving, or otherwise accessing a firearm; and a military court protective order issued after the person to be subject to the order has received notice and opportunity to be heard on the order, shall restrain such person from possessing, receiving, or otherwise accessing a firearm in accordance with section 922 of title 18,” SEC. 529 of H.R. 4350 states.

Military courts could order 'red flag' gun confiscation under defense bill

A provision in the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act would allow military courts to issue protective orders that include “Red Flag” gun

americanmilitarynews.com

 

[fresch]

Military courts could order ‘red flag’ gun confiscation under defense bill​

A provision in the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act would allow military courts to issue protective orders that include “Red Flag” gun confiscation, according to the more than 1,300-page bill.

In the legislation, those beholden to the United States Code of Military Justice could be issued a “military court protective order” by a military judge or magistrate, which would make “possessing, receiving, or otherwise accessing a firearm” illegal.


“A military court protective order issued on an ex parte basis shall restrain a person from possessing, receiving, or otherwise accessing a firearm; and a military court protective order issued after the person to be subject to the order has received notice and opportunity to be heard on the order, shall restrain such person from possessing, receiving, or otherwise accessing a firearm in accordance with section 922 of title 18,” SEC. 529 of H.R. 4350 states.

Military courts could order 'red flag' gun confiscation under defense bill

A provision in the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act would allow military courts to issue protective orders that include “Red Flag” gun

americanmilitarynews.com

F that, how about up holding the constitution first.

 

[libertysnake]

I'm trying to read into this more. It seems to only apply to those subject to UCMJ, but I need to read into title 10 chapter 80 more to understand what they're ammending.

 

[libertysnake]

So from what I can tell, this only refers to military courts -- but it does mean they're willing to use the military courts to control the civilian lives of soldiers on a whim, without due process.

 

[Apeman]

So when they return from a mission and they're a little stressed they're going to lose their personal weapons. Or a spouse that is having an issue with them can have them taken away. Awesome. Now they're targeting the freedom of those that defend our freedom.

 

[meketrefe]

Is that for Afghanistan too or only here?

 

[Cooolone]

Military court does not translate to civilian jurisdiction... This is for military personnel as far as I've read. And your ass is theirs until discharged, no? But bumbling Joe is grabbing at whatever straws he can musta in his efforts and anti gun agenda! Anyways...

 

[Robin]

So from what I can tell, this only refers to military courts -- but it does mean they're willing to use the military courts to control the civilian lives of soldiers on a whim, without due process.

C'mon man!!!! Yer splitt'n hair's!!!! This is the new Bizarro USA!
Robin

 

[prambo]

Definitely not too soon to change the flag...



Hell, I refuse to fly the stars & stripes anymore - that country doesn't exist anymore.

 

[Acer-m14]

posted a bit about this here .,.

https://nygunforum.com/threads/help-me-get-religious-waiver-for-vaccination.45969/post-978141

 

[mca90guitar]

Several Republicans said it won't be in the final bill, guess we will find out. Can't say I trust most of them.

 

[SomeSoldier]

So from what I can tell, this only refers to military courts -- but it does mean they're willing to use the military courts to control the civilian lives of soldiers on a whim, without due process.

So if a 11B gets one of these orders and is deployed to a war zone, does he just throw grenades at people?

 

[Grimscale]

Several Republicans said it won't be in the final bill, guess we will find out. Can't say I trust most of them.

Unless there is a declaration, signed by those politicians, and which they would put their lives and livelihoods on the line to uphold it, I call bullshit.

 

[livingston]

Gun Owners of America
https://twitter.com/GunOwners
@GunOwners
Some House RINOs who supported Red Flag laws in the #NDAA on Thursday are falsely claiming the bill doesn’t really have gun confiscation orders for the military.
Maybe they didn't read the bill, but we did.

Imbecile RINO Dan Crenshaw Votes For Military Red Flag Law Then Whines Democrats Tricked Him…​

https://twitter.com/GunOwners/status/1441817914449952777/photo/1