Maybe she ID's as black.nope, not ALL the boxes. She ain't black![]()
![]()
They specifically said DNA identification. Its not likely he was fingerprinted unless it was one of those child data siphoning events for "safety" Some states do a thumbprint for state ID, I do not think PA does.How about fingerprints ?
Correct, thats why I mentioned it. Still, they ran DNA in a matter of hours and came up with him exactly and not a relative? Thats pretty amazingThere are several large voluntary DNA databases like ancestry out there.
Possible a relative first, like mom or dad. That would be quick.Correct, thats why I mentioned it. Still, they ran DNA in a matter of hours and came up with him exactly and not a relative? Thats pretty amazing
Ancestry.comHere is something to contemplate. By reports, the shooter was not carrying ID and was identified by DNA. He had no criminal history so its unlikely his DNA was "in the system" Where did they get the sample from to compare? They ran DNA and matched him conclusively in a matter of hours? Infant DNA screening is suppose to be blind and not in a traceable database, where else could it have come from unless he had done genealogy?
Not if he was FBI.Shooter was unemployed. I wonder where he got the funds to purchase the rifle, if he was the purchaser.
If he wasn't, someone is in deep doodoo for the straw purchase.
If someone believes this to be true they must have a double digit iq.So.... If Biden arranged this near assassination, it's legal, right?
Yep, still dont like herPretty sure she was once a never Trumper?
Or perhaps he was manipulated into escalation, somewhere online buy a glowieNot if he was FBI.
subterfuge creating a false Flag: Register in the opposition Party then when exposed it appears as though it was one of their own...or could be that just how he signed up, might even be a Party Cheerleader, but I doubt it.Wonder what his motive was...or if we'll ever know.
So you are saying he has constitutional authority to shoot his opponent?"Held: Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority."
From Sotomayor's dissent:
The Court now confronts a question it has never had to answer in the Nation's history: Whether a former President enjoys immunity from federal criminal prosecution. The majority thinks he should, and so it invents an atextual, ahistorical, and unjustifiable immunity that puts the President above the law
The majority makes three moves that, in effect, completely insulate Presidents from criminal liability. First, the majority creates absolute immunity for the President's exercise of "core constitutional powers." Ante, at 6. This holding is unnecessary on the facts of the indictment, and the majority's attempt to apply it to the facts expands the concept of core powers beyond any recognizable bounds. In any event, it is quickly eclipsed by the second move, which is to create expansive immunity for all "official act.Ante, at 14. Whether described as presumptive or absolute, under the majority's rule, a President's use of any official power for any purpose, even the most corrupt, is immune from prosecution.
Does that mean she's not voting for Brandon?nope, not ALL the boxes. She ain't black![]()
![]()
That was probably the other shooter.I thought they identified the shooter as this guy
Ignoring the need to "stop" a shooter, someone actively threatening with a gun, and the ostensible "Skill" the SS Marksmen are thought to posses; WHY wasn't the shooter just incapacitated? decades ago we listened to a presentation from a Secret Service Agent and the question of killing assassins was posed and the answer was they did NOT want to kill the assassin because they needed to investigate to see who else was involved...Remember Kids "Dead Men Tell No Tails."Here is something to contemplate. By reports, the shooter was not carrying ID and was identified by DNA. He had no criminal history so its unlikely his DNA was "in the system" Where did they get the sample from to compare? They ran DNA and matched him conclusively in a matter of hours? Infant DNA screening is suppose to be blind and not in a traceable database, where else could it have come from unless he had done genealogy?
The distance from Bethel park to Butler is only a little over an hour away.Unemployed but money to travel to protests
No criminal record no military service.How about fingerprints ?
I can see no other way to explain what happened yesterday.