Does that mean if you whittle a stock for your AK out of a 2x4 that they can sue home depot ?"This legislation removes the civil liability shield on manufacturers that produce any component of a ghost gun, allowing gun violence victims and their families to pursue a private right of action."
ANY COMPONENT. Put Glock sights on an unserialized gun - the victim shot with that gun gets to sue Glock. Bottomless pit. With the intent to destroy the entire firearm industry. A disarmed population is a helpless population. The Government is your friend.
I suspect there may be quite a few with the SN "FUAC" out there...Imagine if everyone serialized their ghost guns with the same serial number? Would be even harder for the ATF to track.
They should really add that serial number requirement to cocaine and heroine. Imagine how much that would reduce drug abuse...That’ll teach those criminals once and for all.
Sent to Katko to pass on to Ritchie.Attention Mr Ritchie Torres:
Your definition of the made up term "ghost gun" bears a remarkable resemblance to an action which is protected under the Constitution, and which has already been upheld as an individual Right.
No matter how many scary words you try to use, it is still a fundamental Right.
Since your proposed legislation is in direct violation of the Constitution of the United States, and is in direct contradiction of previous court decisions upholding that Right, your legislation is, effectively, absolutely useless and unenforceable.
Since you are incapable of doing your due diligence with regards to writing legislation, and as you are apparently incapable of honoring your Oath of Office, I strongly recommend you consider a career change.
I hear they need dog walkers in Washington.
But regardless of your state of employment, your proposal is unacceptable and will not be complied with.
This should be emailed to him.Attention Mr Ritchie Torres:
Your definition of the made up term "ghost gun" bears a remarkable resemblance to an action which is protected under the Constitution, and which has already been upheld as an individual Right.
No matter how many scary words you try to use, it is still a fundamental Right.
Since your proposed legislation is in direct violation of the Constitution of the United States, and is in direct contradiction of previous court decisions upholding that Right, your legislation is, effectively, absolutely useless and unenforceable.
Since you are incapable of doing your due diligence with regards to writing legislation, and as you are apparently incapable of honoring your Oath of Office, I strongly recommend you consider a career change.
I hear they need dog walkers in Washington.
But regardless of your state of employment, your proposal is unacceptable and will not be complied with.
They should really add that serial number requirement to cocaine and heroine. Imagine how much that would reduce drug abuse...