The “Coup” Against a Sitting U.S. President Became Official on October 29th, 2019…

Steal2B · Nov 10, 2019

livingston said:
The “Coup” Against a Sitting U.S. President Became Official on October 29th, 2019…
The word “coup” shifted to a new level of formalized meaning last week when members of the political resistance showed up to remove President Trump wearing military uniforms.

Not only did U.S. military leadership remain silent to the optics and purpose, but in the testimony of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman he admits to giving instructions to ignore the instructions from a sitting United States President.

In the absence of push-back from the Joint Chiefs, from this moment forth, the impression is tacit U.S. military support for the Vindman objective.
Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council official, testified before congressional committees conducting an impeachment inquiry on October 29, wearing a full military uniform.

To date there has been no visible comment from U.S. military sanctioning Lt. Col. Vindman for his decision; or correcting the impression represented by Vindman’s military appearance. The willful blindness is concerning, but it gets much worse
Beyond the debate about the optics of the “coup“, within the testimony of Lt. Col Vindman, the witness readily admits to understanding the officially established policy of the President of The United States (an agreement between President Trump and President Zelenskyy), and stunningly admits that two weeks later he was giving countermanding instructions to his Ukrainian counterpart to ignore President Trump’s policies.

The coup against President Donald Trump went from soft, to hard. Consider…

The "Coup" Against a Sitting U.S. President Became Official on October 29th, 2019... - The Last Refuge

The word “coup” shifted to a new level of formalized meaning last week when members of the political resistance showed up to remove President Trump wearing military uniforms. Not only did U.S. military leadership remain silent to the optics and purpose, but in the testimony of Lt. Col. Alexander...

theconservativetreehouse.com

After attending military functions watching true military patriots choke on not insulting their Commander in Chief during the Obama years, this is really disturbing. This is truly Russian interference in our 2016 election with the Democrats.

"he’s collaborating in a partisan hit on the Commander-in-Chief."

"Vindman tried to change the transcript of the president’s phone call."

" We need to know why a FARA registered agent of the Ukraine government lists him as among the people they have lobbied "

"bullsh** is circulating on Twitter. It is mostly false, starting with his bio. He was commissioned via Army ROTC in January 1999. He has never completed the Special Forces Officers Qualification Course. He has no prior enlisted service. He has very few of the ‘scare badges’ attributed to him in this tweet. This is not a ding on Vindman but it shows the lack of honesty and absence of integrity common to his loudest defenders.

He’s a foreign area officer which means he has not served in a combat unit since he was in Iraq... Without getting into parsing words over what “hero” means, we know with great certainty that his service in combat was average, it was ... pedestrian."

You Don't Need to Question LTC Vindman's Patriotism to Have a Lot of Questions for LTC Vindman

Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, a military officer at the National Security Council, cen

www.redstate.com

Steal2B · Nov 10, 2019

livingston said:
The “Coup” Against a Sitting U.S. President Became Official on October 29th, 2019…
The word “coup” shifted to a new level of formalized meaning last week when members of the political resistance showed up to remove President Trump wearing military uniforms.

Not only did U.S. military leadership remain silent to the optics and purpose, but in the testimony of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman he admits to giving instructions to ignore the instructions from a sitting United States President.

In the absence of push-back from the Joint Chiefs, from this moment forth, the impression is tacit U.S. military support for the Vindman objective.
Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council official, testified before congressional committees conducting an impeachment inquiry on October 29, wearing a full military uniform.

To date there has been no visible comment from U.S. military sanctioning Lt. Col. Vindman for his decision; or correcting the impression represented by Vindman’s military appearance. The willful blindness is concerning, but it gets much worse
Beyond the debate about the optics of the “coup“, within the testimony of Lt. Col Vindman, the witness readily admits to understanding the officially established policy of the President of The United States (an agreement between President Trump and President Zelenskyy), and stunningly admits that two weeks later he was giving countermanding instructions to his Ukrainian counterpart to ignore President Trump’s policies.

The coup against President Donald Trump went from soft, to hard. Consider…

The "Coup" Against a Sitting U.S. President Became Official on October 29th, 2019... - The Last Refuge

The word “coup” shifted to a new level of formalized meaning last week when members of the political resistance showed up to remove President Trump wearing military uniforms. Not only did U.S. military leadership remain silent to the optics and purpose, but in the testimony of Lt. Col. Alexander...

theconservativetreehouse.com

"We already have the transcript.

What Vindman believes is wholly irrelevant. What he reports is irrelevant, because again, we have the transcript. His opinions on what Sondland may have been thinking are equally irrelevant. No amount of “concerns” further corroborates anything that’s already been said by previous witnesses...

What exactly is Vindman supposed to be adding here except his own opinion?

This is theater and nothing more. Schiff wants to trot out as many people as possible to reinforce his narrative without actually having to prove that narrative is true."

Alexander Vindman's Impeachment Testimony Is Largely Irrelevant, Stop Freaking Out About It

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., talks to reporters about the release b

www.redstate.com

prambo · Nov 10, 2019

Steal2B said:
"We already have the transcript.

What Vindman believes is wholly irrelevant. What he reports is irrelevant, because again, we have the transcript. His opinions on what Sondland may have been thinking are equally irrelevant. No amount of “concerns” further corroborates anything that’s already been said by previous witnesses...

What exactly is Vindman supposed to be adding here except his own opinion?

This is theater and nothing more. Schiff wants to trot out as many people as possible to reinforce his narrative without actually having to prove that narrative is true."

Alexander Vindman's Impeachment Testimony Is Largely Irrelevant, Stop Freaking Out About It

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., talks to reporters about the release b

www.redstate.com

The concern expressed by CTH is, generally, well founded. The appearance of this Fifth Columnist in his uniform is suggestive, minimally, of tacit approval of his actions by his superiors. The wearing of the uniform outside military duties, should be carefully considered. It was worn intentionally by Vindman, IMHO.

He is a traitor and has brought discredit upon himself, the uniform and the service by his actions.

He is far from unique...McRaven and Petreaus are other examples of this ilk.

Besides, he's an O-5, he don't know shit. Only trusted 2 officers above O-3 in my short time in .MIL.

SomeSoldier · Nov 10, 2019

Why are these people not hanging from street lights? This is treason.

Defilade · Nov 10, 2019

The Dems have to do everything to remove Trump. Trump is exposing this last POS administrations massive crimes.

The “Coup” Against a Sitting U.S. President Became Official on October 29th, 2019…

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan