U.S. Supreme Court backs Republican in Pennsylvania ballots case

[Dr. Evil]

U.S. Supreme Court backs Republican in Pennsylvania ballots case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with an unsuccessful Republican candidate for a judgeship in Pennsylvania and threw out a lower court's ruling that had allowed the counting of mail-in ballots in the race that he had sought to exclude because voters neglected to write the date on them...

ca.movies.yahoo.com

How about they back what's right, not what's Republican? I've said this is about right vs. wrong, good vs. evil. Not parties.

 

[Phazer]

U.S. Supreme Court backs Republican in Pennsylvania ballots case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with an unsuccessful Republican candidate for a judgeship in Pennsylvania and threw out a lower court's ruling that had allowed the counting of mail-in ballots in the race that he had sought to exclude because voters neglected to write the date on them...

ca.movies.yahoo.com

How about they back what's right, not what's Republican? I've said this is about right vs. wrong, good vs. evil. Not parties.

According to Liberal Progressives, backing Liberals is "right" and backing conservatives is "wrong."

 

[Grimscale]

How about they back what's right, not what's Republican?

Is it possible that the Court did back what is right, but the media, being anti-Conservative, used the phrase "backs a Republican" in an effort to sway voters?

 

[pjzwtl]

I’m tired of this crap. Read the instructions it isn’t that difficult. If there isn’t a date either someone can’t comprehend the basics or it’s a dirty ballot either way the date cast can’t be verified so into the trash it should go.