Chonkster
22lr
This should exemplify that our government is, and has been occupied by a foreign gov since JFK demanded Israels AIPAC register as a foreign agent, sadly he lost his head soon after . These 2 traitors proposed an end to the first amendment and yet they are called US representatives.
Vague Law by NJ Democrat Gottheimer, NY Republican Lawler Sparks Fear of 20 Years in Prison, $1M Fines for Boycotting Israel - Hudson TV
A highly contentious bill, the IGO Anti-Boycott Act (H.R. 867), sponsored by New Jersey Democrat Josh Gottheimer and New York Republican Mike Lawler, has triggered widespread alarm across the United States due to its vague language, which critics warn could deter Americans from boycotting or criticizing Israel out of fear of facing 20 years in prison or $1 million in fines. Although the bill was pulled from a House vote on May 5, 2025, following bipartisan opposition, its introduction has raised serious concerns about threats to free speech and the potential to chill dissent regarding U.S. policy toward Israel.
Supported by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the IGO Anti-Boycott Act sought to amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 by prohibiting U.S. citizens and entities from participating in boycotts of Israel or its settlements promoted by international governmental organizations (IGOs), such as the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). The bill outlined severe penalties for violations: fines up to $1 million or imprisonment for up to 20 years. While its sponsors argued it targeted specific economic actions, the bill’s ambiguous wording has sparked fears that it could be interpreted to punish criticism of Israel, prompting accusations that it undermines First Amendment protections.
Vague Law by NJ Democrat Gottheimer, NY Republican Lawler Sparks Fear of 20 Years in Prison, $1M Fines for Boycotting Israel - Hudson TV
A highly contentious bill, the IGO Anti-Boycott Act (H.R. 867), sponsored by New Jersey Democrat Josh Gottheimer and New York Republican Mike Lawler, has triggered widespread alarm across the United States due to its vague language, which critics warn could deter Americans from boycotting or criticizing Israel out of fear of facing 20 years in prison or $1 million in fines. Although the bill was pulled from a House vote on May 5, 2025, following bipartisan opposition, its introduction has raised serious concerns about threats to free speech and the potential to chill dissent regarding U.S. policy toward Israel.
Supported by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the IGO Anti-Boycott Act sought to amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 by prohibiting U.S. citizens and entities from participating in boycotts of Israel or its settlements promoted by international governmental organizations (IGOs), such as the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). The bill outlined severe penalties for violations: fines up to $1 million or imprisonment for up to 20 years. While its sponsors argued it targeted specific economic actions, the bill’s ambiguous wording has sparked fears that it could be interpreted to punish criticism of Israel, prompting accusations that it undermines First Amendment protections.
