STS556
.223 Rem
I got my 16" barrel from Bullet Guy last year. No threads on the end. He may still sell them.
Why go featureless when you have this option.
Article 26.00.21. "Semiautomatic" means any repeating rifle, shotgun or pistol, regardless of barrel or overall length, which utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge or shell to extract the fired cartridge case or spent shell and chamber the next round, and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge or shell.Why go featureless when you have this option.
That's not what the law says.To be a Manual Loading firearm, the shooter has to do some type of manual operation to load the next round into the chamber no matter what it is. If the shooter only has to pull the trigger to shoot each shot and the firearm automatically unloads and reloads itself without the shooter having to conduct any other operation, it is a Semiauto.
That's not what the law says.
You said manual loading requires X. The law doesn't mention manual loading at all so that cannot be referenced. It only mentions semi auto.Semiauto mean autoloding or self Loading. I not following you. Kindly explain
You are correct the law does not mention Manual Loading. However, when explaining semiauto you need to explain what is a "manually loaded" firearm. In addition, how else does the firearm unload and load itself if it did not use the energy of the cartridge.You said manual loading requires X. The law doesn't mention manual loading at all so that cannot be referenced. It only mentions semi auto.
You also mentioned, "without the shooter having to conduct any other operation, it is a Semiauto.". That isn't mentioned anywhere as well.
We can only go by what the law says.
You can only explain semi auto by what's written in the actual law. I don't understand your next question.You are correct the law does not mention Manual Loading. However, when explaining semiauto you need to explain what is a "manually loaded" firearm. In addition, how else does the firearm unload and load itself if it did not use the energy of the cartridge.
There is no definition of flash hider either, wanna bet some overzealous DA can't convince a jury that a flash can is a flash hider ?They are okay. There is no mention of them in the law.
There is no definition of flash hider either, wanna bet some overzealous DA can't convince a jury that a flash can is a flash hider ?
Not worth the risk to me.
A flash can doesn't suppress flash. It redirects it. The same amount of flash is still there.There is no definition of flash hider either, wanna bet some overzealous DA can't convince a jury that a flash can is a flash hider ?
Not worth the risk to me.
Well, technically so does a flash hider, always the same powder burning.A flash can doesn't suppress flash. It redirects it. The same amount of flash is still there.
The prosecutor need do no such thing. He only needs to show that the energy to reload the gun came from the last fired round.However, when explaining semiauto you need to explain what is a "manually loaded" firearm. In addition, how else does the firearm unload and load itself if it did not use the energy of the cartridge.
Even if you brought a non-compliant rifle to the range how would anyone know if you had, or had not, registered it as a 'assault rifle'?
Is LE allowed to spot check (run your serial number) without just cause?
By the time you're paying for a defense attorney and an expert witness you've already paid more money than a flash hider is worth to me.I'm sure it's possible. That does not say much about the defense attorney or the expert the defense attorney may or may not have retained to support their position. I agree some people are more conservative than others and that is their choice. Any law when litigated can have different outcome due to the fact that common people (jury) are making decisions based on what is presented to them and how good the presentation is. I have seen cases go the opposite way even though all the evidence points one way. That is just how it goes sometimes. But if you have a valid position supported with valid argument and evidence. You would think the odds are in your favor.
What about your unmodified bullet button?By the time you're paying for a defense attorney and an expert witness you've already paid more money than a flash hider is worth to me.
So, go ahead and win that case, I'll be rooting for you. Hell, I'd even kick in a few bucks to help, because FUAC. I just don't think it's worth the risk of 10s of thousands of dollars in legal fees to me personally.
More valuable than a flash hider by a long shot.What about your unmodified bullet button?
Are you saying you put a bullet button on a featureless rifle? If not, then what the hell are you talking about?More valuable than a flash hider by a long shot.
I'm saying the risk vs reward for a bullet button is a better bet than the risk vs reward for a flash can.Are you saying you put a bullet button on a featureless rifle? If not, then what the hell are you talking about?
So, a revolver is semi auto ?To be a Manual Loading firearm, the shooter has to do some type of manual operation to load the next round into the chamber no matter what it is. If the shooter only has to pull the trigger to shoot each shot and the firearm automatically unloads and reloads itself without the shooter having to conduct any other operation, it is a Semiauto.
But wouldn't that be that the same if someone likes a flashcan on a featureless so that they can direct the blast away from them? You can still reload normally.I'm saying the risk vs reward for a bullet button is a better bet than the risk vs reward for a flash can.
The ability to remove a magazine is far more valuable than the reduction in flash. I have never said what route *I* took with any of my rifles, I will say that I didn't take the same route with all of them, as the utility and complexity of the various methods vary from rifle to rifle.
I *could* see someone adding a BB to a "featureless" rifle as a belt and suspenders sort of CYA. Especially if they were "pushing" the featureless thing.
The question is "is it featureless ?" If it's got a flashcan.But wouldn't that be that the same if someone likes a flashcan on a featureless so that they can direct the blast away from them? You can still reload normally.
A flash can is not a flash suppressor no matter what you say. It isn't designed as one, doesn't look like one, or even perform the same function.The question is "is it featureless ?" If it's got a flashcan.
"Featureless" with a flashcan and featured with a BB are the same gamble: Am I going to run into an overzealous LEO or DA who wants to stretch the definition of flash hider, or detachable magazine ?
And I'm sure with enough money your lawyer can convince the jury of that too.A flash can is not a flash suppressor no matter what you say. It isn't designed as one, doesn't look like one, or even perform the same function.