You know what they say about payback. Lawsuit against BLM is allowed to proceed because BLM leader was present while cops were hurt

[Saltwater60]

Oh this could be big and a huge payback. I say let it ride and let it bankrupt them. I’m sick of us taking it on the chin and nothing coming back our way. Well this could be the tide turner.

Supreme Court allows police officer’s suit to move forward against Black Lives Matter leader — The Hill

The Supreme Court allowed a police officer’s lawsuit against a Black Lives Matter leader to move forward Monday.

apple.news

 

[Grimscale]

Wait... an organization's leader has to be present at the scene of a crime before someone can sue that organization?

That makes no sense.

 

[Saltwater60]

This is well said.
The anonymous officer, however, distinguishes his lawsuit by arguing that Mckesson — unlike the NAACP — engaged in illegal activity by organizing a protest to block a roadway. The injuries were a foreseeable consequence of that allegedly illegal activity, the officer claims.


“There is nothing un-American or unconstitutional about chilling speech designed specifically and effectively to engage police officers, where time after time the time, the place and manner of the speech has resulted in looting, property destruction, business closures, personal injury, economic loss, bystander and police injury,” the anonymous police officer’s attorney wrote in court papers.