Niki Fried sues Biden admin over rule banning medical weed users from owning firearms

[Saltwater60]

Wow a democrat sticking up for gun owners? Or is she sticking up for weed users? Anyway I agree with it and it will be interesting to see where it leads.

Top Florida Democrat Sues Over Federal Rule Keeping Medical Marijuana Users From Buying Guns

Florida’s lone statewide elected Democrat, Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried, plans to sue the Biden administration Wednesday to try to block a federal rule that prohibits medical marijuana users from buying guns.

www.nbcmiami.com

 

[MothMan]

 

[FRANKIE]

I think her interest is purely Agricultural

 

[GOPerfect]

This has nothing to do with her support of the 2A or the ownership of guns; this is her way to gain as much support from the dopeheads.

 

[Apeman]

I agree this isn't to help gun owners but maybe it will. If Hunter can put blow up his nose and still have a gun then why shouldn't weed users be able to?

 

[That_FNG]

I hope she loses. Weed is an illicit substance And should continue to carry the negative consequences for being an addict of it.

 

[99cummins]

Is she going to after the FMCSA for CDL holders next?

 

[96coal449]

Wow, I never saw this coming.

 

[Saltwater60]

I hope she loses. Weed is an illicit substance And should continue to carry the negative consequences for being an addict of it.

I agree, but it’s only firmed I am weed users. Think Of the consequences of you lose your gun rights if you take a medication that can make you incapacitated or loopy.

 

[Cooolone]

Well, doesn't matter your feelings towards weed, or alcohol, or walking in the park or hunting!

Attaching an activity to being a gateway for either approving or denying a RIGHT renders that then not to be a RIGHT but just another privilege dispensed at the whim of the so called authority having jurisdiction over your, well... RIGHTS!

Regardless of any pot smoking liberal progressive supporting the cause for self serving reasons, it is what it is aside from all that!

Might as well add that 2A only apply on Sundays that fall in the third Sunday after a new moon and then only in leap years! How's that sound? And supporting any arbitrary restriction based upon "weed" while allowing alcohol or a multitude of prescription drugs is just ridiculously moronic!

 

[That_FNG]

I agree, but it’s only firmed I am weed users. Think Of the consequences of you lose your gun rights if you take a medication that can make you incapacitated or loopy.

The benefits of the cannabis plant can be utilized without needing to smoke it. Ever since NY has decided to no longer pursue appropriate legal action against weed smokers my health has been affected at work, home and even just going to the store.

 

[Beerman]

The benefits of the cannabis plant can be utilized without needing to smoke it. Ever since NY has decided to no longer pursue appropriate legal action against weed smokers my health has been affected at work, home and even just going to the store.

Dude, that’s a lot of weed use. It’s true that marijuana has a plethora of health benefits, but tone it down. Enjoy it in moderation, man. Heh.

 

[Acer-m14]

but if your high on weed at home .. .. dude just take the munchies don't kill me .. pew pew ..

because the govt says so .. ..

 

[Celt]

She is antigun, but this is about her having a weed card and pistol permit.

 

[That_FNG]

Dude, that’s a lot of weed use. It’s true that marijuana has a plethora of health benefits, but tone it down. Enjoy it in moderation, man. Heh.

I don’t enjoy weed, I suffer because of addict weed smokers.

 

[Beerman]

I don’t enjoy weed, I suffer because of addict weed smokers.

Yeah, I understood that. Just breakin’ yer bawz a bit based on how you wrote that post. Ive never used it in any form, and have no interest, either. Cheers!

 

[Saltwater60]

The benefits of the cannabis plant can be utilized without needing to smoke it. Ever since NY has decided to no longer pursue appropriate legal action against weed smokers my health has been affected at work, home and even just going to the store.

You’re absolutely correct. I smell it everywhere now. All those that say legalizing it hasn’t led to more traffic accidents or smoking while driving are plain and simply lying. I’ve seen numerous people smoking it while driving it and smell it regularly coming from cars.

 

[Saltwater60]

I don’t enjoy weed, I suffer because of addict weed smokers.

Makes me cringe with disgust every time I smell it. I hate it too.

 

[Cooolone]

Makes me cringe with disgust every time I smell it. I hate it too.

It's that new stuff, skunk weed... Ridiculous high THC content.

I actually looked up the old stuff, earth smelling, Acapulco Gold, lol...

I don't smoke, was just curious. You know we can grow our own now, so I looked. Seeds are like $50 for like 5 seeds! Wow!

Nothing but big $$$ in this... And the Govt endorses it because they now embrace VICE at the sacrifice of society for a few bucks more! Gambling too... But hey, if you have that addictive compulsive disorder and have a problem, there's an 800 number for you to call!

Fuckers...

 

[That_FNG]

Makes me cringe with disgust every time I smell it. I hate it too.

I actually have trouble breathing and seeing due to it. Strong pungent weed smell/smoke for some reasons triggers the allergic response my body has to my environmental allergies. Been to the doctors and they have no clue as to why.

 

[Celt]

I have nothing against anybody wanting the smoke weed, I don't see it any different than drinking. But like anything, there need to be consequences for when people break the law while using certain substances.

I can't stand the smell of it, and working in the ghettos, I smell it everywhere and it gives me a headache too. But I also can't stand cigarette smoke and to me there's nothing worse than driving with my window down on a beautiful day and having to close it because somebody in front of me is smoking a cigarette, a cigar, or weed.

Smoking weed is not something somebody should need a medical card for in my opinion, just like carrying a pistol is not something we should need to have a permit for.

 

[Karpteach]

I agree with her. I do NOT use weed. However, NewYorkistan disallows anyone taking certain meds to own a gun. I think this will open up a huge can of worms.

 

[spat]

I hope she loses. Weed is an illicit substance And should continue to carry the negative consequences for being an addict of it.

Drunks with guns are a lot more dangerous than stoners with guns.

There is no justification, or authority for pot to be illegal at all.

You cannot do an end run around the constitution by placing a tax on something and then not allowing people to pay the tax.

Technically at the federal level pot is regulated the same way machineguns are. There is no law against possessing them. There is merely a tax you are not allowed to pay. So the "crime" is tax evasion. I do not think tax evasion should be grounds for alienating someone's 2A rights.

 

[Grimscale]

She is antigun, but this is about her having a weed card and pistol permit.

If she is anti-gun, why does she have a pistol permit? I thought she wouldn't like guns.

Or is it more "guns for me and not for thee" bullshit like most of the 'left' like to parrot.

 

[That_FNG]

Drunks with guns are a lot more dangerous than stoners with guns.

There is no justification, or authority for pot to be illegal at all.

You cannot do an end run around the constitution by placing a tax on something and then not allowing people to pay the tax.

Technically at the federal level pot is regulated the same way machineguns are. There is no law against possessing them. There is merely a tax you are not allowed to pay. So the "crime" is tax evasion. I do not think tax evasion should be grounds for alienating someone's 2A rights

Drunks with guns are a lot more dangerous than stoners with guns.

There is no justification, or authority for pot to be illegal at all.

You cannot do an end run around the constitution by placing a tax on something and then not allowing people to pay the tax.

Technically at the federal level pot is regulated the same way machineguns are. There is no law against possessing them. There is merely a tax you are not allowed to pay. So the "crime" is tax evasion. I do not think tax evasion should be grounds for alienating someone's 2A rights.

Weed is an addictive illicit narcotic. If we are going to legalize weed than all drugs should be legalized at the same time. Otherwise weed should remain illegal and be treated as such.

 

[Saltwater60]

Weed is an addictive illicit narcotic. If we are going to legalize weed than all drugs should be legalized at the same time. Otherwise weed should remain illegal and be treated as such.

That’s where it’s going. Oregon is trying to legalize magic mushrooms right now.

 

[That_FNG]

That’s where it’s going. Oregon is trying to legalize magic mushrooms right now.

If they have legalized weed, then they should have legalized mushrooms, LSD, crack, heroin, PCP, meth etc should all be legalized there. There is no difference between the drugs. They are all addictive substances.

 

[Celt]

If she is anti-gun, why does she have a pistol permit? I thought she wouldn't like guns.

Or is it more "guns for me and not for thee" bullshit like most of the 'left' like to parrot.

Exactly, guns for me but not for thee.

 

[Celt]

If they have legalized weed, then they should have legalized mushrooms, LSD, crack, heroin, PCP, meth etc should all be legalized there. There is no difference between the drugs. They are all addictive substances.

Last I had heard, marijuana was not a physically addictive drug. But I'm not stating that as a fact.

 

[spat]

Weed is an addictive illicit narcotic. If we are going to legalize weed than all drugs should be legalized at the same time. Otherwise weed should remain illegal and be treated as such.

Marijuana is neither addictive, nor a narcotic.

It required a constitutional ammendment to outlaw alcohol, because they rightly recognized at that time that the constitution did not give the federal government the authority to regulate drugs.

They still don't have the authority to, but unfortunately they do have the power to illegally regulate it.

So, yes, at a federal level, the DEA should not exist, and the FDA should be advisory only.

We won't even go into the ATF.