AR-15’s should be banned because the founding fathers didn’t own them
- Thread starter Saltwater60
- Start date
Dominion voting machines weren’t around either. Ban them!
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Anything can be used as a weapon of war. Fucking Punji stakes are a weapon of war molotov cocktails are a weapon of war.
Can they name any war where the AR15 was issued to troops? Any army that issues them?
And one more thing, if they are weapons of war, then why are the police useing weapons of war against the public they want to disarm?
Can they name any war where the AR15 was issued to troops? Any army that issues them?
And one more thing, if they are weapons of war, then why are the police useing weapons of war against the public they want to disarm?
Last edited:
Bob
6.5 Creedmoor
They did.
The British march on Lexington and Concord in 1775 was for the express purpose of disarming the populace and to arrest Samuel Adams and John Hancock.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
Well, they did, but they all wore nice red coats to make them easy targets.
And the chief rectum kept his ass in England.
Mr. terzmo
.308 Win
How'd that work out in the long run
spat
.700 Nitro Express
It worked out exactly as it should....
Bob
6.5 Creedmoor
Shit, Canada didn't get their independence from the crown until 1982. I'd say we made out better than they did.
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
were not some of the muskets back then bigger then 50 cal ... 68 caliber rings a bell ..
never seen a 5.56 musket .. lol
never seen a 5.56 musket .. lol
spat
.700 Nitro Express
yea, .50 cal would have been a mouse gun in the black powder era.
IrishMick
.357 mag
Brown Bess musket was typically a .75 caliber. The Springfield Rifled Musket 1861 was a .58 caliber I believe.
Bob
6.5 Creedmoor
And let's not even get started on the hundreds of cannon in private hands during that time.