Russ Woody
.45 acp
I haven't heard anything. I hope Clarence Thomas grows a set for us NYer's.
Somebody has to undo this sniveling bitches unconstitutional work
Somebody has to undo this sniveling bitches unconstitutional work
Cant happen because the ones who "delay" our rights are the ones controlling the flow of money into their own pockets. Much like the screams to "tax the rich", they, the rich, are the ones that would have to "tax the rich"Yay! More delays!
Every day our Rights are delayed should mean one more day politicians don't get paid.
Quit Bitchin' and contribute.....I just gave them $25.00
If not out of patriotism them because Hochul and 80% are going insane over this..contribute and further drive them insane......... in rage.
From the website link above...
"Governor Hochul again calls us “NRA donors and MAGA extremists” (as recently as about two hours ago on her Facebook page)"
WHAT THE FUCK!!!......................OBEY THE US CONSTITUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I AM THE NRA............. AND MAGA...........
I wouldn’t have too high of hopes. Remember permits and background checks are ok in their mind. I think the best we can hope for is providing a reduced amount of information. If they rule background checks are not constitutional I’d be surprised. Also they would then have to say ammo is protected by 2a and therefore it would lead to gun background checks being unconstitutional and I don’t see that happening.Well it is Sunday, so I can wait a couple more days.
I hope SCOTUS puts that bitch in her place.
Well if they go by Bruen I don't believe there were background checks in 1791.I wouldn’t have too high of hopes. Remember permits and background checks are ok in their mind. I think the best we can hope for is providing a reduced amount of information. If they rule background checks are not constitutional I’d be surprised. Also they would then have to say ammo is protected by 2a and therefore it would lead to gun background checks being unconstitutional and I don’t see that happening.
I don’t disagree one bit but the issue is if they, meaning the right, get rid of background checks that will be political suicide and we all know what’s more important. Our rights or them winning politically, them winning takes the cake.Well if they go by Bruen I don't believe there were background checks in 1791.
Shouldn't be politics in a Supreme Court decision, now afterwards in the state houses that's a different story . We shall see .I don’t disagree one bit but the issue is if they, meaning the right, get rid of background checks that will be political suicide and we all know what’s more important. Our rights or them winning politically, them winning takes the cake.
But there is by nature of who appointed them.Shouldn't be politics in a Supreme Court decision, now afterwards in the state houses that's a different story . We shall see .
This is how it rolls. We all knew this was going to happen. A cluster fuck.But there is by nature of who appointed them.
I find it hilarious how they take up this ammo background check almost immediately but the you’re a felon for carrying your gun everywhere sits with lack of attention. Makes me sick.
Exactly.I firmly believe that the whole CCIA should be on the table, not just bits and pieces of it
GAZZOLA, NADINE, ET AL. V. HOCHUL, GOV. OF NY, ET AL.
The application for stay addressed to Justice Thomas and referred to the Court is denied.
FIFYThis shit disgusts me. Denial after denial after fucking denial.
How so? And then they need to resubmit it immediately.SCOTUS has denied the application for a stay of the NYS ammunition law. Appears that it wasn't properly presented.