Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
That reads to be a lot simpler an operation than I had imagined. Nice job.
Robin
Robin
Russia launched a missile and drone attack on Kyiv, the capital of Ukraine, on June 6, 2025. The attack killed people, according to Ukrainian officials. The barrage consisted of 407 drones and 44 ballistic and cruise missiles
Looks like the Ukraine FA and FO
Some great videos on YT
They will all fail. Best thing GB could do, walk awayAlso on Kherson and Tirnopol. It was the biggest attack since April. Supposedly this is retaliation for the Ukrainian attacks on railroad bridges and passenger train. Retaliation for drone attacks on strategic bombers may still to come.
Ukraine is threatening sea drone attacks on Russian Pacific fleet. Great Britain is deeply involved in this.
Also on Kherson,Tirnopol and few other cities. It was the biggest attack since April. Supposedly this is retaliation for the Ukrainian attacks on railroad bridges and passenger train. Retaliation for drone attacks on strategic bombers may still to come.
Ukraine is threatening sea drone attacks on Russian Pacific fleet. Great Britain is deeply involved in this.
It's insane to wage war like that.Also on Kherson,Tirnopol and few other cities. It was the biggest attack since April. Supposedly this is retaliation for the Ukrainian attacks on railroad bridges and passenger train. Retaliation for drone attacks on strategic bombers may still to come.
Ukraine is threatening sea drone attacks on Russian Pacific fleet. Great Britain is deeply involved in this.
But they don't need to.Starmer, Macron and Merz are functionally delusional...for whatever insane reason they keep mouthing off how easy it would be to defeat Russia.
An object lesson for them...study the seige of Stalingrad and the Nazi's winter retreat, very closely...and then walk away from the Neo-Con bullshit.
They can yammer about drones, bombs, nukes and whatever...but to actually take and hold ground, you have to put grunts on the ground, and they don't have many, regardless of what some people on this thread think. All 3 are dissolute societies in the final stages of collapse.
Its a catch 22, if Putin raises an army of 2 million men required to finish the job in Ukraine , He then poses a Very real threat to the border lands Possibly prompting NATO action. I know theres a lot of Bullshit saying he is going to attack and over run NATO , but NATO knows different, they understand that Russia hasnt demonstrated the actual capacity to do the job. And that was by intent by the Russians , they can sell it to the public , but the military understands He hasnt shown the intent or the ability to invade the west .If he raises an army of huge proportions he poses a viable threat .Its a very calculated response. He wants to use just enough troops to win without poseing a threat to the west.It's insane to wage war like that.
You don't go tit for tat. You fight the fucking war.
It's not like D-Day was "revenge" for the battle of Britain. It's not like it wasn't inevitable once France was lost.
It was done because it was a necessary step to win the war.
So, either these Russian attacks had a logical military purpose, and so they should have been executed regardless of what Ukraine did, or they didn't, so they shouldn't have been executed at all.
If you guys are right and Putin has been half assing this whole war and still has room to "escalate", then he's a moron.
If you're going to fight a war, then you don't use the least force you think will work. You use the most force you can bring to bear.
That's like carrying an extra 22 to use in case your .45 would be too much.
Nobody serious thinks Russia can invade the west, or even make a serious attempt to do so.Its a catch 22, if Putin raises an army of 2 million men required to finish the job in Ukraine , He then poses a Very real threat to the border lands Possibly prompting NATO action. I know theres a lot of Bullshit saying he is going to attack and over run NATO , but NATO knows different, they understand that Russia hasnt demonstrated the actual capacity to do the job. And that was by intent by the Russians , they can sell it to the public , but the military understands He hasnt shown the intent or the ability to invade the west .If he raises an army of huge proportions he poses a viable threat .Its a very calculated response. He wants to use just enough troops to win without poseing a threat to the west.
The question that has me puzzled is why hasnt he taken the bridges out over the Dniper river or at least most of them , the obvious answer is because he wants to secure them to use later, but that doesnt wash, because the Ukraines are going to blow those bridges if they are in danger of falling to the Russians
Thats the story theyre trying to sell to the public to help support the military aid to Ukraine , If Russia defeats Ukraine, then all of Europe is in danger. Hogwash.Nobody serious thinks Russia can invade the west, or even make a serious attempt to do so.
He can't even take the west half of Ukraine after 3 years.
I'm sure Russia is just one good Calvary charge from victory.It is apparent throughout this entire thread....
There are many that have no understanding of Russia, The Ukraine, the people of the two nations or how certain warfare is fought.
You honestly think Russia could present a real conventional threat to NATO ?Thats the story theyre trying to sell to the public to help support the military aid to Ukraine , If Russia defeats Ukraine, then all of Europe is in danger. Hogwash.
You honestly think Russia could present a real conventional threat to NATO ?
It would look like Conoco fields writ large.
The lie is to present them as more of a threat than they really are to justify the spending.
Is it? You think they should have just run over the NATO trained, equipped,army which was larger , and just brush them aside so easy? Without question, there are some serous problems with the training and leadership of the Russian armed forces , that is apparent. Both sides had to contend with a new form of drone warfare for which there had been no real consideration or counter for . With real time satellite intelligence. The russian military had to fight with limited use of airpower because they could not absorb the losses, and if it was attritted to badly, they would have no hope of countering a NATO air campaign, they were forced to husband thier air assets as much as possible , leaving it to artillery and the ground pounders . in the back of the Russians minds is How are we going to deal with an attack by NATO? The Russians cant go 100% , it exposes them if they fall shortI'm sure Russia is just one good Calvary charge from victory.
The whole point is that Russia *doesn't* know how to fight this type of warfare. That's been apparent from the beginning.
Throw in real time intelligence, and its a game changerA hundred dollar drone can take out multi-million dollar strategic bomber. A pair of scissors can take out a drone. Unbelievable how warfare is changing.
https://www.rt.com/russia/618783-drone-scissors-ukraine-fibre/
But the only answer to "how will we counter NATO ?" Is "you don't".Is it? You think they should have just run over the NATO trained, equipped,army which was larger , and just brush them aside so easy? Without question, there are some serous problems with the training and leadership of the Russian armed forces , that is apparent. Both sides had to contend with a new form of drone warfare for which there had been no real consideration or counter for . With real time satellite intelligence. The russian military had to fight with limited use of airpower because they could not absorb the losses, and if it was attritted to badly, they would have no hope of countering a NATO air campaign, they were forced to husband thier air assets as much as possible , leaving it to artillery and the ground pounders . in the back of the Russians minds is How are we going to deal with an attack by NATO? The Russians cant go 100% , it exposes them if they fall short
""You fight like a young man, with nothing held back, admirable, but mistaken""-Bane from batman
For the last year, the Russians have been taking ground from Ukraine, town after town city after city, at a snails pace, but still Ukraine cant stop them
They cant launch any kind of effective offense , they have no hope of ever driving the Russians out , foot by foot , inch by inch the Russians move forward in an infantrys mans war and Ukraine cant stop them .
Yeah right, Like the Russian general staff is going to just quit and walk away. Now thats dumb.But the only answer to "how will we counter NATO ?" Is "you don't".
If NATO attacks, the Russians will do nothing because they can do nothing. Holding something in reserve for that contingency is just stupid.
Imagine a Mexican cartel saying "we're holding those troops in reserve in case the Americans attack". It's that dumb.
What is it you think they would do ?Yeah right, Like the Russian general staff is going to just quit and walk away. Now thats dumb.
It is apparent throughout this entire thread....
There are many that have no understanding of Russia, The Ukraine, the people of the two nations or how certain warfare is fought.
Throw in real time intelligence, and its a game changer
In WWII the polish sent Calvary charges on horseback to repel the German Blitzkreig combined arms assault.I think they would make plans accordingly . No its not dumb, Let NATO aircraft enter Russia and sees what happens Russian fighters are behind a belt of the best air defenses in the world after crossing it, they are met with a fucking tiger, then they get to cross back again. and as soon as they land Russian missiles are following them home. It aint gonna be a cake walk like you think
The Luftwaffe had better planes and pilots too, You seem to think we have such a vast technological edge that no matter what anyone does they cant stop us. thats horse shit propaganda thinking , We havent fielded much newer weapons in 30 years , to busy fighting everywhere .
The thing is, Its the job of the military to overcome the enemy's advantages , not quit. Maybe it wouldnt work, Ok. but they are not ever going to say Ok We quit, We dont even plan on resisting? Are you fucking for real? is that what you really think?
Yes thats the theory. But it isnt going to work the way you think, there are many counter measures the Russians can take, They can already block our GPS systems, they can use Jamming, and they can field thousands of radar emitting decoys Possibly hit our own airfields with drones or missiles. In any case, this demonstrates your belief that We are immune to enemy action and that technology cannot be overcome with lesser means. The Ukraines themselves had better training , better equipment , better intel than the Russians and they are losing.In WWII the polish sent Calvary charges on horseback to repel the German Blitzkreig combined arms assault.
It would look like that.
You don't fly through air defenses like that. You dismantle them.
Russia has somewhere in the neighborhood of 50 full S-400 systems.
The first phase of a fight with NATO would see most of those destroyed within the first few hours.
The next couple days would be spent on intensive SEAD missions to hunt down the rest. The lifespan of an S-400 would be minutes after turning on it's radar.
50ish S-400 systems with 1000 F35s to hunt them down. That math does not favor the Russians.
We have fought all these Russian systems.Yes thats the theory. But it isnt going to work the way you think, there are many counter measures the Russians can take, They can already block our GPS systems, they can use Jamming, and they can field thousands of radar emitting decoys Possibly hit our own airfields with drones or missiles. In any case, this demonstrates your belief that We are immune to enemy action and that technology cannot be overcome with lesser means. The Ukraines themselves had better training , better equipment , better intel than the Russians and they are losing.
Whats your plan if the Russians had developed a method for rendering our radar seeking missiles ineffective ? Supposing they had taken out our observation and targeting satellites ? Supposing our HARM missiles dont work as advertised like the patriot ? You dont take the enemy seriously, You have an arrogance of superiority that can get your people killed. If you go into the fight thinking one thing, and it turns out your wrong, Your going to pay the price in blood and treasure.
Maybe your right, maybe the Russians are all retarded and its a cake walk like you think , I dont agree with that.
You know how terrain mapping works right? Radar. It sends radar waves directly to the ground and reads the terrain compares it to its on board maps and makes corrections . You send out enough radar chatter and you can blind them .terrain mapping
This! You see this shit!!?? You do understand why this wont work right?Sure, maybe they have some magic anti-HARM missile technology. Guess we will just have to blow up their air defense with laser guided bombs instead.
Yeah Im getting that from the fact that Ukraine citys are being bombed by missiles , Im getting that from the fact that patriots are not capeable of hitting hyper sonic missiles. You can see those facts on any news station chief,Not sure where you get the idea that Patriots aren't working as advertised.
When asked *how* the Russians could theoretically do any of this, you just fall back on some nebulous "they would make plans" statement that says absolutely nothing.
Can you specify what personal feelings ? because I have no idea what your talking about.So, try to back something up with some actual research or quantitative data and not just your personal feelings that "Russians are cool, so they'll win"