No More Security Clearance For Hildabeast

[kev74]

It looks like Illary gave up her security clearance last summer.

Hillary Clinton’s security clearance removed ‘at her request,’ Judiciary Committee reveals

Anyone else get the feeling things are happening that we haven't heard about yet? It would certainly explain the continued anger and hostility toward Trump.

 

[Acer-m14]

Why does it Matter now


and no i'm NOT saying it in her voice ..

 

[VietnamEraVet]

I’m sure she got word that it was going to be revoked, and so she “asked that it be withdrawn”. Fuck the Hildabeast!

What I’m more interested to know are the names of the Hildabeast’s 4 aides besides Cheryl Mills (yet another corrupt “bunt”) who had theirs pulled.

 

[Acer-m14]

@VietnamEraVet .. i bet she has back ups on (C) stuff .. just in case the $$$ runs out .. what does security clearance matter to her .. nodda ..

 

[Deplorable Me]

Why does she need a security clearance when she has spies and insiders in the Whitehouse and everyone else is to blame in her world?

 

[Tinman]

Why does anyone keep security clearance when they have left their job? That to me is just plain stupid. You wouldn’t let the employee that quit keep the keys to the store.

 

[1911guy]

Why does anyone keep security clearance when they have left their job? That to me is just plain stupid. You wouldn’t let the employee that quit keep the keys to the store.

The purpose is so the new people in that position can converse with the previous holder of the position. Those discussions are frequent in a non hostile changing of the guard. In this case she never should have had a clearance or the position (just saying) I would have pulled her clearance on Jan 20!

 

[HighlandLofts]

I am hoping trump trips her and the entire obozo administration new assholes after the midterm election. The timing would be perfect. Really clean house on both side of the aisle when these scum pieces of shit start throwing each other under the bus.

 

[Robin]

My first thought was,'What the fuck is she up to now!'. That skanky bitch does NOTHING without a political or ass saving, usually one and the same, motive behind it.
Robin

 

[holdover]

My guess is they were going to revoke it. If they did that , they would have to state a legal reason for it (Emails) and she did not want that information to become public. And if her clearance was revoked she would become ineligible to run for office.

 

[holdover]

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that a federal court ordered a hearing for Friday, October 12, regarding a request for testimony under oath from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills and several other State Department officials about Clinton email searches in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit about the Benghazi terrorist attack. The hearing was set by U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth.

Hearing Date: Friday, October 12, 2018

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Location: Courtroom 15

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

333 Constitution Ave. N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001

In his October 4, 2018, order setting the hearing date, Judge Lamberth said:

Two and a half years ago, the Court granted plaintiff’s request for limited discovery, mindful of parallel proceeding before Judge Sullivan and the ongoing inquiries by the State Department’s Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the House Select Committee on Benghazi. Since those proceeding have concluded, it is time to set a plan for further proceedings in this case.

The development comes in Judicial Watch’s July 2014 FOIA lawsuit filed after the U.S. Department of State failed to respond to a May 13, 2014 FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch seeks:

• Copies of any updates and/or talking points given to Ambassador Rice by the White House or any federal agency concerning, regarding, or related to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
• Any and all records or communications concerning, regarding, or relating to talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack given to Ambassador Rice by the White House or any federal agency.

This is the lawsuit that forced the Clinton email system issue into the public eye in early 2015.

In 2014, a related Judicial Watch case brought to light the fact that the “Internet video” talking points regarding the Benghazi attack were orchestrated in the Obama White House.

In March 2016, U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth granted “limited discovery” to Judicial Watch, ruling that “where there is evidence of government wrong-doing and bad faith, as here, limited discovery is appropriate, even though it is exceedingly rare in FOIA cases.” In May 2016, Judicial Watch filed an initial Proposed Order for Discovery seeking additional information. The State Department opposed Judicial Watch’s proposal, and in December 2016 Judge Lamberth requested both parties to file new proposed orders in light of information discovered in various venues since the previous May.

In its filing Judicial Watch informed the court that despite repeated conferences with the State Department they had been “unable to reach agreement on a discovery proposal” and that “[the State Department] is unwilling to agree to any discovery at all in this action.” Judicial Watch’s discovery proposal focuses on two main areas:

• Evidence of wrongdoing or bad faith with respect to State Department’s response to Plaintiff’s FOIA request for records related to the talking points provided to U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice following the September 11, 2012 Benghazi attack; and
• Potential remedies that may ensure a sufficient search for responsive records is undertaken.

Judicial Watch seeks both documents and depositions. The documents requested include:

1. All documents that concern or relate to the processing of any and all searches of the Office of the Secretary for emails relating to the September 11, 2012 Benghazi attack and its aftermath …
2. 2. All communications that concern or relate to the processing of all searches referenced in Document Request No. 1 above, including directions or guidance about how and where to conduct the searches …
3. All records that concern or relate to the State Department’s policies, practices, procedures

Federal Court Orders Hearing in Judicial Watch Case Seeking Testimony of Hillary Clinton - Judicial Watch


Weekly Update: New Clinton Emails Found - Judicial Watch

 

[Robin]

And if her clearance was revoked she would become ineligible to run for office.

If thats the case, were I Trump, I would revoke it in emeritus. That ought to work.
Robin

 

[livingston]

Clinton’s “Researchers”….
Posted on October 12, 2018 by sundance
I’m going to walk through a long-held hypothesis of sorts, surrounding how multiple institutions within government were weaponized around politics. The foundation is what we already know about how the intelligence apparatus was politically weaponized by multiple Obama-era officials.

Jeff Carlson has assembled a strong and in-depth outline covering most of the weaponized intelligence agencies and how they related to “spygate” – SEE HERE –

However, there has also been a strong suspicion that most of the corrupt origination activity would never surface.

The downstream ramifications to the institutions of our IC apparatus would be too destructive. What follows below is the story that will never reach sunlight officially.

When reading the Department of State (DoS) letter today, I cannot avoid reviewing the information against the backdrop of known DoS corrupt political activity that extends beyond the Clinton emails scandal. For this explanation, here’s the excerpt that matters:



Forget Clinton’s motives for a moment. We all know her “request” was a proactive measure due to the likelihood her clearance was going to be forcibly revoked. Requesting the removal avoids multiple political and logistical issues of her security file being damaged by a forced revocation. The request is transparent in motive; so lets get beyond the surface issue.

Continue reading →

 

[livingston]

State Department Revokes Security Clearances For Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills and Four Additional “Research Aides”…
State Department Revokes Security Clearances For Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills and Four Additional “Research Aides”…
Posted on October 12, 2018 by sundance
A statement from Senate Judiciary Committee today outlines a letter received from the U.S. State Department highlighting security ramifications of the ongoing issues of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton -and her staff- transmitting classified information over unsecured networks:
WASHINGTON – The U.S. State Department recently confirmed that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s security clearance has been withdrawn at her request. Clearances for five other individuals whom Clinton designated as researchers have also been withdrawn, including close aide Cheryl Mills, according to the State Department’s update of its ongoing review of the mishandling of classified information related to the use of Clinton’s non-government email server.


Documents containing classified material have been sent to the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, and all valid security incidents have been added to the security file for some individuals. Department authorities are continuing to review tens of thousands of documents for classified content.

The update was provided to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and is being released for the first time following consultation with the State Department. The update follows a letter from the Department in May of 2017 confirming the Department’s review into any mishandling of classified information stemming from the use of Clinton’s non-government email server. That letter, which responded to an inquiry from Grassley, also outlined the review and adjudication process. (LINK)