Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Haha. So now you have to be a general in the army to organize a rebellion.
Interpreting the 2A
- Thread starter Truebeliever
- Start date
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
@nortatoga . I mean this with no offense. Truebelier at least provides some debatable content. You on the other hand... Maybe your opinion is the way it is because you don't know how wars are fought today. It's not the same as it wasn't 1775 with horseback and single shot muskets.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
And could you point to where organizing a rebellion is in the Constitution? Maybe if you Win it's GTG!!!
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I can't anymore. I thought I heard it all. Guess I'll have to stop responding to you now.
I'll just focus on Truebelier. He has coherent arguments.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
I guess you don't like losing! Maybe you should put me on IGNORE!!
If I'm on your ignore list, you lost a fight and ran away.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Bye bye.I guess you don't like losing! Maybe you should put me on IGNORE!!
If I'm on your ignore list, you lost a fight and ran away.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Figures! All mouth no substance!
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I thought I heared it all. I don't normally like to insult anyone but man. Some guy here just asked me to point where in the Constitution it says that you can organize a rebellion.
What an ignoramus.
What an ignoramus.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I'm still here. I just can't respond to someone of your mental capacity. It's a waste of my time. I never ignore anyone. I'll still see your posts and shake my head.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
To use Hillary's favorite...At this point, what does it matter? Some people have no issue with constant encroaching on the 2nd which was put in place to give the people the ability to right a failing government. We're no longer allowed to own some of the weapons that would give us this advantage which are common place in the military, and are being further limited by banning certain weapons and their magazines. Being forced to open carry just makes it easy to track anyone the gov sees fit and I wouldn't be surprised if that's part of their reasoning in some circles. The 2nd no longer has any teeth.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Where is the force to OPEN CARRY?
49 States issue concealed carry license's (Vermont needs neither)
45 State recognize open carry
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
How many times in this thread alone have certain people said that concealed carry is not protected by the 2nd?? This has been a major issue with this thread. Either protect both or don't bother. Just because States recognize concealed carry, it doesn't mean they always will. As we can see with the ever chipping away at the 2nd and leftist loonies gaining popularity. And for the record, 5 States do not recognize open carry and you are forced to conceal carry. I'd rather conceal in most cases, but the choice should be mine and mine alone.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
If concealed carry is a tool for self defense and overthrowing the government, then it's protected. Some here seem to think that overthrowing the government consists of wearing a uniform and standing in a battlefield. They cannot even fathom a guerilla war where you conceal, get close and fire at a government official or soldier protecting the tyrannical government. They think you should be licensed for it by the government.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
@FrankenCub you like some others are looking at this from the wrong direction. We live in a State that severely restricts pistols, NO? (lets just keep this about pistols.) And all these Court case's have been turned away by the SCOTUS from the few other States which also restrict pistols! We do have pistol license as do 49 other States, Right ? So what are we complaining about (Sarcasm!!) Now what if we were to fight for the Right to Open Carry like the other 45 States (Which is the Constitutional protected Right) Would that not knock the Sullivan Act on it's ear? The State want's to restrict my CCW fine I'll just Open Carry which the Constitution protects!! How do you like me NOW!!
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
You really better hope they don't pass that Social Media back-round check law!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
So now my 1st Amendment right is in jeopardy too. Why would you say something like that? You are a tool. A quisling. A damned idiot. A Fudd. Someone who has no respect for the Constitution. You love government overreach. I bet you want the government to take away my guns too.
Last edited:
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Did i say I supported that law? But if passed it will take time to work through the Courts! And someone who talks of over throwing the Government should be concerned!
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
You support all government overreach laws. Anyone that reads all your posts can see that. You were even stupid enough to say that the constitution doesn't give you the right to dispose of a tyrannical government.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Well as I have said about you in the pass, You have a real problem with read comprehension!
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
I'm looking at it from the direction that my Rights are protected (well, are supposed to be) open or concealed across the US. Not limited to certain jurisdictions that choose to allow it. The 2nd doesn't just protect pistols, but to play the game I'll keep it at that. I'm limited on where I can go with my pistol, I'm limited to how much ammo it can carry, and I'm limited on how I can carry it. The BOR were written for the country as a whole. But some feel States can over ride federal BOR. States continue to pass unconstitutional laws and the SCOTUS thumbs it's collective nose at us. Just look at the other "common use" weapons that are banned here to see where our pistols will be in the future. The BOR are no longer valid otherwise we wouldn't be having this conversation. Some are willing to allow some limitations, some see those limitations as the next step to subjugation.
Truebeliever
6.5 Creedmoor
Maybe. Surpressive Fire would not be as aimed but possible.
They would would still be an effective infantry and could still provide a base of fire.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
As you say here in NYS we are limited, I agree! But why? Because we are limited to the Sullivan Act (NYS Penal Law 400) which people keep trying to fight in Court. 49 other States issue pistol permits as I said. 45 have Open carry do you think they feel infringed that they need to get a License to conceal carry some as easy as buying a hunting or fishing license.
Fighting for open carry is not going to make concealed carry go away!
Yes States do keep passing unconstitutional laws (Be glad Trump was Elected) because they know that they have to work through the Courts!
And as far as the SCOTUS thumbing there nose, with the recent make-up of the Court that may have been a good thing. Remember there Ruling is final!!
Last edited:
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
The men who wrote our laws were rebels. It's hard for me to imagine that their intent was to limt the power of the people and guarantee a monopoly of arms to the government
spat
.700 Nitro Express
You can have a full auto in NY, we have a member here who did, until he left for thw other side of the world anyway...
The point is that if you can allow it with enough paperwork, you can allow it without the paperwork too.
Truebeliever
6.5 Creedmoor
He wasn’t allowed full auto for himself. It would be owned by the government contractor ( who could be owned by him but it’s the company’s or government entity ‘s.) .There are very few exceptions to it and private non governmental “contractor” or entity isn’t on that list. But if I am wrong, great. It still falls under that regulation we are talking about. But 2nd admendment has limits as does any “right” under the constitution. We disagree as to those limits begin and end. And the “individual right “ has only been formally recognized since Heller although the Dred Scott case did mention it.
The “common standard “ was set by Heller and McDonald which is less than the “effective standard “. SBR, selective fire rifles are not common. Semi auto is. 30 round magazines are common. I hope the court under Trump will finally enforce Heller and McDonald if not recognize more carry rights.
But the court will not recognize beyond that. Let’s be realistic. The positive is that the lower courts are now recognizing stun guns, nunchucks and other weapons as protected.More should come. Non semi autos have been too.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
didn't they CCW in the wild wild west at the poker game table .. .. u know them pistols up the arm sleeve .. i don't think they got hung for the CCW part ..
FUAC is thinking of a new law that all sober people have to stay home .. because of drunk driving ..
FUAC is thinking of a new law that all sober people have to stay home .. because of drunk driving ..
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Where in the 2A does it say common? The only reason that comes up is because a corrupt judge who was looking for a way to limit the 2A ruled as such.
All the government has to do is make certain guns uncommon via legislation or high taxes on them like they did with full auto to no longer make them protected.
You don't see the backhanded corruption there?
All the government has to do is make certain guns uncommon via legislation or high taxes on them like they did with full auto to no longer make them protected.
You don't see the backhanded corruption there?
Truebeliever
6.5 Creedmoor
Please don’t use the Wild West. A lot of those towns had gun control ( remember that when the anti gun people say it will be be like the Wild West).The shootout at OK Corral with Wyatt Earp happened when the Earp brothers went to arrest and disarm the Clayton’s.
Gunfight at the O.K. Corral - Wikipedia
https://maps.apple.com/?ll=31.71388...bbMG2P0AxuB6F61GEW8A5GocbbMG2P0BBuB6F61GEW8A=
Dodge city had it too.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
name them laws .. and who followed them ..