Leftists plan to storm WHITE HOUSE when Trump wins

[Phazer]

Active Denial System

 

[holdover]

I can fully anticipate a shooting by provocateur's at police . Police return fire into crowd . What a headline line that would make. Trumps Police kill unarmed protestors ! Trump must be removed!

 

[Phazer]

"Activate the mine field."

 

[Dr. Evil]

Not MG, bullets keep on going and kill innocent people.

OK. Flame thrower it is.

 

[Robin]

Dear Donald,
I am free Wednesday.
Robin

 

[CaseHardened]

Both? ... Yeah I'm going with both of them.

Machine Gun - First

Flame Throwers - Second

Gotta' dispose of the bodies somehow.

Tho, even betta' - send them in afterwards.

 

[Bigfoot]

If the commies are hoping for martyrs... I say make their hopes come true.
Anyone with a brain knows that the MSM is full of shit anyway.

Any fair minded person understands that an attack on the White House.
Must be violently put down. It's not a time to worry about what CNN will say.

 

[Blimey]

If this actually came to pass (I'm sure it won't), my guess is that as long as the crowds were not using lethal force the police and secret service wouldn't, either. In such a case 5000 (?) people trying to storm an iron fence would be successful, because the guards would be unlikely to have enough water canons and whatever else to prevent it. The president would be evacuated and they would let the WH be overrun. You'd then see antifa and blm spray painting the oval office. Even if you decided to order the guard to shoot anybody who breaches the wall a great many of them would not.

I've seen compounds get overrun in other countries and typically large numbers of civilians have little problem getting in because there is either a lack of force or an unwillingness to use it to defend the structure. You can see this happen at multiple embassies.

Civilians would in fact have far more luck storming the white house with gas masks and protest signs than if they brought guns, because then they'd be in a real fire fight and likely lose.

 

[ProgSpear]

 

[Calculon]

If this actually came to pass (I'm sure it won't), my guess is that as long as the crowds were not using lethal force the police and secret service wouldn't, either. In such a case 5000 (?) people trying to storm an iron fence would be successful, because the guards would be unlikely to have enough water canons and whatever else to prevent it. The president would be evacuated and they would let the WH be overrun. You'd then see antifa and blm spray painting the oval office. Even if you decided to order the guard to shoot anybody who breaches the wall a great many of them would not.

I've seen compounds get overrun in other countries and typically large numbers of civilians have little problem getting in because there is either a lack of force or an unwillingness to use it to defend the structure. You can see this happen at multiple embassies.

Civilians would in fact have far more luck storming the white house with gas masks and protest signs than if they brought guns, because then they'd be in a real fire fight and likely lose.

The Secret Service CAN NOT allow the White House grounds to be overrun under any circumstance. As said earlier, while I don't wish harm on these "protesters," there is a line that can't be crossed. The White House is off limits.

 

[spat]

The Secret Service CAN NOT allow the White House grounds to be overrun under any circumstance. As said earlier, while I don't wish harm on these "protesters," there is a line that can't be crossed. The White House is off limits.

While the optics of mowing them down on the lawn might not be great, once they're actually inside they are fair game.

It's a residence, if ANTIFA was storming your house even in NY you would be clear to open fire once they're in the door.

On top of that, this is also a military installation *and* chock full of top secret information.

I am sure they will make every attempt to repel borders without killing anyone, but they simply cannot allow the place to be overrun.

An embassy in a foreign country is one thing, but "Storm Area 51" was never going to happen. They would have literally mowed them down with heavy machine guns before they got into any of those hangers.

"Storm the Pentagon", "Storm Fort Knox", or "Storm Langley" would have a better chance of being tolerated than "Storm the Whitehouse" .

 

[Steal2B]

While the optics of mowing them down on the lawn might not be great, once they're actually inside they are fair game.

If the gates are secure, the fenced area is an extension of the Whitehouse and it is not a safe zone for invaders, even if they feel they are entitled to ravage, riot, arson, pillage, or stage a coupe.

The games are over.

 

[Blimey]

While the optics of mowing them down on the lawn might not be great, once they're actually inside they are fair game.

It's a residence, if ANTIFA was storming your house even in NY you would be clear to open fire once they're in the door.

On top of that, this is also a military installation *and* chock full of top secret information.

I am sure they will make every attempt to repel borders without killing anyone, but they simply cannot allow the place to be overrun.

An embassy in a foreign country is one thing, but "Storm Area 51" was never going to happen. They would have literally mowed them down with heavy machine guns before they got into any of those hangers.

"Storm the Pentagon", "Storm Fort Knox", or "Storm Langley" would have a better chance of being tolerated than "Storm the Whitehouse" .

I agree we might as well call this experiment quits if the white house got stormed.

 

[masterswimmer]

On top of that, this is also a military installation *and* chock full of top secret information.

All other justification is valid for retaliatory force. However, the above statement in and of itself is the only justification necessary. Top secret, classified, national security info, detrimental to the safety of our citizens is at risk.

@spat is spot on.