spat
.950 JDJ
There was certainly the potential for more.So there was more fraud in this election?
There was also far less ability to detect it. Almost by design.
There was certainly the potential for more.So there was more fraud in this election?
Sure, but you said there was. Just looking for that E word.There was certainly the potential for more.
There was also far less ability to detect it. Almost by design.
There is fraud in every election. The only question is the scale.Sure, but you said there was. Just looking for that E word.
gellerreport.com
More tomorrow.Proof coming tomorrow. Stay tuned! Big news!
www.thefreedomtimes.com
You’re asking to prove a negative;that there was no fraud. It’s a logical impossibility.Convince me the election was conducted fairly.
The same way you would convince the IRS your deductions are legitimate.
If you can't, then don't expect me to just "trust you" anymore than they would.
“This Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by the evidence,” Judge Matthew Brann wrote.
Obama's golf buddy Matthew Brann is a well known partisan hack ... this is not a surprise and this was understood to be the case a week ago. The appeals will go to judges that don't legislate from the bench and follow the law.You’re asking to prove a negative;that there was no fraud. It’s a logical impossibility.
Trump’s case just thrown out in PA. I guess the judge saw this the same way I do.
![]()
Trump loses lawsuit that sought to block Pennsylvania win for Biden
The judge's decision is a crippling blow to Trump's long-shot bid to invalidate enough ballots in multiple states to reverse Biden's victory.www.cnbc.com
Elite strike force team indeed. What are they at now? Won 1, lost 30?
Trump tweet about how PA is not lost coming in 10...9...8...
As I said, Powell is a liar and her mouth writes checks her ass can’t cash.
Accusations of malfeasance must be proven by the accuser; his legal team must prove what they have accused.
Congratulations! You've been elected mayor of Clown World! Honk honk!Burden of proof is on Powell to prove what she has claimed.

And you don't throw that around lightly.
She might. I've been a good boy lately! When Biden is inaugurated in January she won't think back to the weeks and months I spent ranting about election fraud and she won't have to try and forget all the times I assured her that any day now it would all be proven in court.You're wasting your time. His wife won't let him.
If that happens my wife will remember the weeks and months WE spent ranting about the election fraud that occurred and she will be right there with me having to deal with the BS that will occur as a consequence related to guns, taxes, socialism, etc. because people like you were too much of a pussy not wanting to possibly have their spouse find out they had differing opinions. Now, mask back on. Covid is exploding.She might. I've been a good boy lately! When Biden is inaugurated in January she won't think back to the weeks and months I spent ranting about election fraud and she won't have to try and forget all the times I assured her that any day now it would all be proven in court.
More of that 6-D chess where losing is winning eh?
You do realize that this is how Trumps team fully expected this to go right?You’re asking to prove a negative;that there was no fraud. It’s a logical impossibility.
Trump’s case just thrown out in PA. I guess the judge saw this the same way I do.
![]()
Trump loses lawsuit that sought to block Pennsylvania win for Biden
The judge's decision is a crippling blow to Trump's long-shot bid to invalidate enough ballots in multiple states to reverse Biden's victory.www.cnbc.com
Elite strike force team indeed. What are they at now? Won 1, lost 30?
Trump tweet about how PA is not lost coming in 10...9...8...
Yes. The kind of losing that gets your case bumped up to a higher court. You know, one with more authority. And shit, maybe this higher court will actually review the evidence rather than just dismissing it. Not 6D chess at all, rather, just the way appeals work. It could have just as easily ended up this way had the judge ruled for Trump.More of that 6-D chess where losing is winning eh?