Election Coverage And Results Thread

[holdover]

"Are my methods 'unsound,' Willard?"

"I dont see any 'method,' at all, sir."

What if, Just saying, what if there was really enough fraud to satisfy you? Do you think We should just let it slide?

The integrity of the elections is paramount to a free country.

Lets say that everything was completely fabricated by lunatics, would there ever really be a threat to over turn the election?

I find it hard to understand the resistance to the allegations of fraud. if there is fraud We need to fix it, if there wasn't , no harm no foul.

 

[holdover]

I wonder if everything on the 6th will be aired on TV (Live) like it should, including any debates...

probably have a covid special on. We need to know more about it.

 

[BDinPutnam]

What if, Just saying, what if there was really enough fraud to satisfy you? Do you think We should just let it slide?

The integrity of the elections is paramount to a free country.

Lets say that everything was completely fabricated by lunatics, would there ever really be a threat to over turn the election?

I find it hard to understand the resistance to the allegations of fraud. if there is fraud We need to fix it, if there wasn't , no harm no foul.

60 lawsuits down the drain dont convince you that there was nowhere near enough fraud to affect the outcome of the election?

What would?

 

[Jmac00]

60 lawsuits down the drain dont convince you that there was nowhere near enough fraud to affect the outcome of the election?

What would?

60 lawsuits, some of which the judge wouldn't even hear. If the presiding judge won't even consider there COULD BE possible fraud, tells me, THERE IS FRAUD and that the locals legal system are in on it

 

[Defilade]

60 lawsuits down the drain dont convince you that there was nowhere near enough fraud to affect the outcome of the election?

What would?

Nice thing about that is the Courts don't decide the Election . The Electors do! With the overwhelming evidence being shown to them they will vote accordingly!

 

[GOPerfect]

60 lawsuits down the drain dont convince you that there was nowhere near enough fraud to affect the outcome of the election?

What would?

Serious question.

If Sixty lawsuits were filed against the NY State SAFEAct and we're all turned down, would you agree the Act fill in the writings of the Constitution?

 

[holdover]

60 lawsuits down the drain dont convince you that there was nowhere near enough fraud to affect the outcome of the election?

What would?

No its not convincing at all. not one of them were thrown out for merit.

What would? How about a fair hearing of them in a court room where the evidence was presented? The judge doesn't get to decide . the court does . I haven't seen a fair court hearing yet,.

 

[Robin]

In not one of those sixty was evidence considered, they were denied hearing.
What would? A fair and just hearing of all the evidence gathered in the contested state(s), before a federal court, publicly and it must be publicly pled and heard.
With the know evidence and monumental impact it would have, no matter which way it might go, I don't think its too much to ask.
Robin

 

[Phazer]

After Joe Biden is inaugurated, I'm going to refer to him as "Uncle Joe" for however long he is in office.

 

[kev74]

After Joe Biden is inaugurated, I'm going to refer to him as "Uncle Joe" for however long he is in office.

I’ll continue to call him Beijing Biden. Maybe Quid-Pro Joe.

 

[Robin]

I think I'll stick with Grifter Piece of Shit.
Robin

 

[Dr. Evil]

60 lawsuits down the drain dont convince you that there was nowhere near enough fraud to affect the outcome of the election?

What would?

What if, just what if, the judges had the same mindset you do without looking at the evidence either? If there was truly nothing there to see, why not go through the process for one of the most important events of our time? IIRC they seemed to drag out the Russia hoax with less evidence.

 

[cgrutt]

IDK, personally participated in a boat rally for Trump last summer, the number of people (in NYS), energy and enthusiasm was off the charts. Witnessed same around election time with car caravans. Watched many airfields packed to the hilt thousands of people who came out to support Trump. Meanwhile the senile, gaff prone Biden stayed hidden behind a mask in his basement. Any rallies that were aired were barely filling an auditorium. No message. No enthusiasm. Just not Trump. Witnessed with my own eyes the big tech firms censoring potentially harmful information from being shared that might hurt Biden during the election. Watched the election live and recall it being odd that counting stopped due to supposed water main break and other states stopping the count for undisclosed reasons. First time I can recall the count just stopping on election night without a victor. In the weeks following election recall watching live press conferences by White House being interrupted livestream when it went off the media's narrative. Unprecedented. So I'm to believe the senile candidate who hid in basement drew 10 million more "actual" votes than Obama? Yeah right. Hundreds if not thousands of people coming forward and testifying to state legislators in the weeks following election yet all the courts refusing to hear any case based on the merits? So much corruption in plain sight. Next several weeks will be interesting. God help us.

 

[Defilade]

After Joe Biden is inaugurated, I'm going to refer to him as "Uncle Joe" for however long he is in office.

I will call him a 3 time loser!

 

[Defilade]

IDK, personally participated in a boat rally for Trump last summer, the number of people (in NYS), energy and enthusiasm was off the charts. Witnessed same around election time with car caravans. Watched many airfields packed to the hilt thousands of people who came out to support Trump. Meanwhile the senile, gaff prone Biden stayed hidden behind a mask in his basement. Any rallies that were aired were barely filling an auditorium. No message. No enthusiasm. Just not Trump. Witnessed with my own eyes the big tech firms censoring potentially harmful information from being shared that might hurt Biden during the election. Watched the election live and recall it being odd that counting stopped due to supposed water main break and other states stopping the count for undisclosed reasons. First time I can recall the count just stopping on election night without a victor. In the weeks following election recall watching live press conferences by White House being interrupted livestream when it went off the media's narrative. Unprecedented. So I'm to believe the senile candidate who hid in basement drew 10 million more "actual" votes than Obama? Yeah right. Hundreds if not thousands of people coming forward and testifying to state legislators in the weeks following election yet all the courts refusing to hear any case based on the merits? So much corruption in plain sight. Next several weeks will be interesting. God help us.

Hell there was major rallies for Trump in other Countries! No other President ever got that!

 

[BDinPutnam]

It's flatly false that these people have not had a chance to bring evidence.

Where they have, they were making allegations that would not have affected the outcome of the election, which is a hurdle you have to clear in electoral law. And lying to a judge (which you'd be doing if you made allegations you know are false in court) has serious repercussions. Perjury rap does not look good on a practicing attorney's cv.

If the courts are so corrupt and their evidence is so good why haven't they just released the, ahem, kraken?

There is no there there.

I dunno, I give up.

 

[Dr. Evil]

Meadows: Over 100 House Members Plan to Object to Electoral Votes

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[Defilade]

 

[masterswimmer]

It's flatly false that these people have not had a chance to bring evidence.

Where they have, they were making allegations that would not have affected the outcome of the election, which is a hurdle you have to clear in electoral law. And lying to a judge (which you'd be doing if you made allegations you know are false in court) has serious repercussions. Perjury rap does not look good on a practicing attorney's cv.

If the courts are so corrupt and their evidence is so good why haven't they just released the, ahem, kraken?

There is no there there.

I dunno, I give up.

It sounds like you're of the ilk that will refute the inauguration of Donald J Trump on January 20th if this coming Wednesday, January 6th, the Constitution is followed when a member of each house of Congress challenges the electorates from the questionable States and the letter of the law is followed to overturn the illegally certified November 3rd election in those States. Would that be fair to say? I mean the courts rejected the cases without even wanting to hear the evidence.

 

[Dr. Evil]

It's flatly false that these people have not had a chance to bring evidence.

Where they have, they were making allegations that would not have affected the outcome of the election, which is a hurdle you have to clear in electoral law. And lying to a judge (which you'd be doing if you made allegations you know are false in court) has serious repercussions. Perjury rap does not look good on a practicing attorney's cv.

If the courts are so corrupt and their evidence is so good why haven't they just released the, ahem, kraken?

There is no there there.

I dunno, I give up.

Just curious. All else being equal, who would you rather have running the country of the two that ran?

 

[GOPerfect]

It's flatly false that these people have not had a chance to bring evidence.

Where they have, they were making allegations that would not have affected the outcome of the election, which is a hurdle you have to clear in electoral law. And lying to a judge (which you'd be doing if you made allegations you know are false in court) has serious repercussions. Perjury rap does not look good on a practicing attorney's cv.

If the courts are so corrupt and their evidence is so good why haven't they just released the, ahem, kraken?

There is no there there.

I dunno, I give up.

Serious question.

If Sixty lawsuits were filed against the NY State SAFEAct and we're all turned down, would you agree the Act fill in the writings of the Constitution?

 

[JaguarJaguarGolf]

How many of the legal challenges to the election proceeded beyond a preliminary hearing?

 

[SonOfSun]

O

I think I'll stick with Grifter Piece of Shit.
Robin

Oh the irony.

 

[Celt]

Serious question.

If Sixty lawsuits were filed against the NY State SAFEAct and we're all turned down, would you agree the Act fill in the writings of the Constitution?

Funny you say this, I specifically opened this thread to make the exact comparison as a general statement for those saying the fraud cases have no merit because the courts said so. Just because some activists in black robes take a position doesnt mean they are correct.

 

[Robin]

O

Oh the irony.

The irony is you and you don't even get it,
Robin

 

[GOPerfect]

@BDinPutnam

I am not demanding anything, but I really would like to know your opinion...

Serious question.

If Sixty lawsuits were filed against the NY State SAFE Act and we're all turned down, would you agree the Act fill in the writings of the Constitution?

Is this not EXACTLY the same thing?

Take out SAFE Act and put anything else in there that is in the Constitution...

 

[BDinPutnam]

@BDinPutnam

I am not demanding anything, but I really would like to know your opinion...

Serious question.

If Sixty lawsuits were filed against the NY State SAFE Act and we're all turned down, would you agree the Act fill in the writings of the Constitution?

Is this not EXACTLY the same thing?

Take out SAFE Act and put anything else in there that is in the Constitution...

No, it is not the same thing at all and you either know it and don't care or don't know it in which case you should do some reading on electoral law.

 

[GOPerfect]

No, it is not the same thing at all and you either know it and don't care or don't know it in which case you should do some reading on electoral law.

So, a Judge refuses to take a case in regards to this election and you say, See, no good.

But, when the same Judge says the same about the SAFE Act, you would be mad? Or would you say ok?

 

[GOPerfect]

No, it is not the same thing at all and you either know it and don't care or don't know it in which case you should do some reading on electoral law.

I am pretty well read on this Election/Electoral law. Not an expert, just well read.

 

[Jmac00]

well, it should be interesting to see which way this goes. Beijing Biden will be the first sitting president that will be under indictment in a foreign country. I would love to see what happens if he goes to Ukraine and they arrest his ass