Gabbard claims treasonous conspiracy

Robin

Robin

.577 Tyrannosaur.
Messages
20,284
Reaction score
43,925
Location
Livingston County
I'd say this is the story of the century, maybe the hugest in the history of our republic, and is getting no legs with main stream media.
www.breitbart.com

GOP Erupts After Gabbard Exposes Obama's 'Treasonous' Russia Hoax

GOP give thunderous response to Tulsi Gabbard's declassification of documents proving the Obama administration manufactured intelligence.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
www.foxnews.com

Tulsi Gabbard: Obama’s goal with Russia hoax was to ‘subvert the American people’s will’ in 2016 election | Fox News Video

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard discusses the intentions of former President Barack Obama’s administration in ‘politicizing intelligence’ on ‘Hannity.’
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Okay Bondi, what will you do with this one? Punt?
Robin
 
Z

Zerex

.308 Win
Messages
2,964
Reaction score
2,355
Location
Rome, NY
Declassification.......................REAL DOCUMENTS REVEALED.

The long story, from 2016 on, involving the FBI/CIA, General Flynn, Manafort, jailed people--Mar 7, 2024 — Sentenced to prison: · Steve Bannon · Peter Navarro · Michael Cohen · Paul Manafort · George Papadopoulos · Roger Stone · Rick Gates.

Page/Strock, Bruce Ohr, Comey, the Inspector Generals Report, many FBI officials, etc is a criminal conspiracy to defraud..maybe 50 or 500 involved.

Bigger than Watergate.

2020 election fraud is likely implicated.
The USAID money scandles of today are involved.

Chinese money may be found.

It may be the end of the Democratic party, and may start a Civil War.
 
FP1201

FP1201

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,770
Reaction score
9,717
Location
Adams, NY
Take a ride down the Rabbit Hole and looks up "Pam Bondi and Ballard Partners" tell me there's no collusion in Government and it needs to be trusted.
 
L

lrick

.308 Win
Messages
2,518
Reaction score
5,691
Location
NY
Everyone wants to see them all in cuffs. While I wouldn't mind that either it's not enough, short of punishment a bit more permanent that's commensurate with treason.

But really, how long would their sentences be and how would they be served? You know there would be some protected status granted. You think they'd be in with genpop trying to cozy up as some gangs bitches for protection? Get real.

Even after all that, they'd serve their time and get to go home to their $$$.

So start right there. Strip all of their assets and return it to the people. Make them and their families all paupers. Money is what drives most of them anyway. It seems to be the only thing they understand.

Civil lawsuits could be an outcome of this. It is an area in which Trump has had some success.

Criminal laws don't dissuade them from taking the risk to set their families up for life. Maybe if the risk ran deeper they'd think twice.

If the credo of the patriot is "we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor", then all should be forfeit for the treasonist.
 
L

lrick

.308 Win
Messages
2,518
Reaction score
5,691
Location
NY
I am mindful of the adage that whatever the left accuses is exactly what they are doing or intend to do.

Heeding that adage it follows that after they built up the whole Russia collusion election interference hoax over 2016, they would be (or were) committing (or planning) their very own election interference in the 2020 steal. I think what Tulsi has disclosed could show breadcrumbs leading the way to the 2020 steal, if the right questions are asked.

So I have questions.

The Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) and the original President's Daily Briefing (PDB) stated that Russia likely was not and did not commit election interference through cyber means.

They go even further to say that they likely did not even have the capability. Note: This was before the election.
1752969189849.png

Q: What led them to that judgment? What research did they conduct? Investigations? Computer forensics? Testing election network and systems security? Did they test Dominion systems? Other systems? Just how much info did feds collect on state-level election processes and implementation? Why did they conduct it?

Remember states administrate elections, it is their domain. It is not necessarily secret, but it is supposed to be compartmentalized away from the federal gov by design. I don't believe that there is any one federal agency that holds oversight over the 50 states elections. There's the FEC (which was created after Watergate), but it is mainly concerned with campaign finance and it is an independent commission but it doesn't "rule" over them. The grasp the fed does have on state run elections might not be all that granular. Election officials very often operate independently to some degree to maintain election integrity. States all have different rules (and we saw some last minute rules changes among some of them in 2020). Our Founders were smart, they knew the process would not be secure administrated at the federal level.

So just how much did this research/investigation allow them to peer into all these different processes? What was learned that was not previously known? Could what was learned have been exploited? Were they actively looking for exploits?

Was this election integrity assessment all a pretense to get a better look under the hood to take control of elections or did that just present itself as a later opportunity?

Anyway, you can read the ICA (still sifting through but it reads like a playbook) and other evidence here.

MEMO from DNI Gabbard

ETA: Don't forget to fold this into the whole scamdemic mail-in ballot cluster....
 
Last edited:
RedBreast21

RedBreast21

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
1,561
Reaction score
2,560
Location
Westchester county
Looks to me some chess pieces might be offered up by the globalists. Or at least being pushed into play for their response. We"ll see how far they want to go with this Epstein scripted narrative they concocted that they're suddenly interested in releasing lists. :beer: :flag:
 
Last edited:
L

lrick

.308 Win
Messages
2,518
Reaction score
5,691
Location
NY
Zerex said:
It may be the end of the Democratic party, and may start a Civil War.
Click to expand...
I imagine that is a real possibility if their messiah got perp walked.

Maybe instead Trump should go after them with civil suits.

You can see the headlines >>> TRUMP SURPASSES MUSK AS WORLD'S FIRST TRILLIONAIRE!!

Then he can give a shitload of it to his voters to rub the dem's noses in it and we be like.....
1752979168639.gif
 
J

JRtraderny

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,249
Reaction score
1,363
Location
USA
Zerex said:
Declassification.......................REAL DOCUMENTS REVEALED.

The long story, from 2016 on, involving the FBI/CIA, General Flynn, Manafort, jailed people--Mar 7, 2024 — Sentenced to prison: · Steve Bannon · Peter Navarro · Michael Cohen · Paul Manafort · George Papadopoulos · Roger Stone · Rick Gates.

Page/Strock, Bruce Ohr, Comey, the Inspector Generals Report, many FBI officials, etc is a criminal conspiracy to defraud..maybe 50 or 500 involved.

Bigger than Watergate.

2020 election fraud is likely implicated.
The USAID money scandles of today are involved.

Chinese money may be found.

It may be the end of the Democratic party, and may start a Civil War.
Click to expand...
I'm in .
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
49,009
Reaction score
134,765
Location
livingston county

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Releases Background Information of President Obama Involvement in Trump-Russia Targeting Op​

July 19, 2025 | Sundance | 373 Comments
The Trump-Russia collusion story was always a targeted false smear intended to generate a special counsel and hamstring the surprising winner from the 2016 election, Donald Trump. The Russia-Collusion narrative was always an Intelligence Community op against Donald TRump.
Yesterday, Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard released a tranche of background information, [114 pages of information], showing how the Obama administration intentionally and with great purpose fabricated the entire story.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard Press Release Here – Files Containing Evidence Here​


What the evidence shows is a focused targeting operation intended to fabricate a false premise by the United States Intelligence Community, through the Office of former DNI James Clapper. The op was green-lighted by Barack Obama as a way to impede the agenda of incoming President Donald Trump. All three branches of government collaborated on the scheme.

Some will ask why John Durham never found this information, and/or shared it publicly. The answer to that question is not hard to understand. John Durham was NEVER allowed to look at the government actors in the Trump-Russia narrative. Durham was not allowed to look at how the U.S. Intelligence Community participated. Durham was ham-strung from the outset of his review and investigation, by Attorney General Bill Barr.
Bill Barr never let John Durham focus on the govt side of the Trump-Russia collusion story. Tulsi Gabbard is not under any restriction on her review. That’s the difference.
Where Durham was not permitted to go, DNI Tulsi Gabbard is going. Her release of the information is specifically because she is empowered to look at this information and release it. Special Counsel John Durham never had that authority.

theconservativetreehouse.com

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Releases Background Information of President Obama Involvement in Trump-Russia Targeting Op - The Last Refuge

The Trump-Russia collusion story was always a targeted false smear intended to generate a special counsel and hamstring the surprising winner from the 2016 election, Donald Trump. The Russia-Collusion narrative was always an Intelligence Community op against Donald TRump. Yesterday, Director of...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com

Gabbard provides a top cover memo on Page #67 that highlights who were the “Principal” actors in the scheme:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Tulsi-declass-1.jpeg
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
49,009
Reaction score
134,765
Location
livingston county
To: Susan Rice
Sent: January 20, 2017 at 12:15 PM
Subject: Note to File

On January 5, following a briefing by IC leadership on Russian hacking during the 2016 Presidential election, President Obama had a brief follow-on conversation with FBI Director Jim Comey and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval Office. Vice President Biden and I were also present.

President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book.” The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.

From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.

Director Comey affirmed that he is proceeding “by the book” as it relates to law enforcement.

He said he is proceeding with caution given the context and he will be mindful to ensure that he is looking at things from a perspective of needing to protect the intelligence sources and methods. He said that he will reach out to the incoming NSA [Michael Flynn] if and when it is appropriate.

The meeting concluded
Susan Rice sent this to herself
Here is the full text of the unclassified portion of Susan Rice’s January 20, 2017 email to herself, as released by the Senate Judiciary Committee:
 
FP1201

FP1201

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,770
Reaction score
9,717
Location
Adams, NY
It's amusing how the same precedents used to prosecute Trump will be used against Obama...
The Left Cheered for Biden because he was on their Team, but Obama, he was their Hero...he did what even the CIA couldn't, wouldn't do and up until now got away with it.
It's always been the position of the Democrats/Leftists that "We could have a utopia IF you'd just let us have everything our own way."
 
FP1201

FP1201

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,770
Reaction score
9,717
Location
Adams, NY
livingston said:
How do these pardons by Biden come into play.... ? You get a pardon.. you get a pardon everyone gets a biden pardon ?
Click to expand...
So it's being pointed out that Biden's Chief of Staff wrote a Memo telling the Auto-pen operator to "approve them all" which sounds to me like a "fuck 'em, we're outta here, not my problem" actions of a disgruntled soon to be ex-employee...professionalism and ethics certainly were not factors in the Biden White House.

Democrats: "Our Goals, any cost."
 
L

lrick

.308 Win
Messages
2,518
Reaction score
5,691
Location
NY
Aside from perp walks, handcuffs and more playing out if it ever does as it should in a just world, does anyone believe that the leftist lunatics will cope nearly as well the right should they see Obama's mugshot?

Pissed we were, yeah, but we kept our cool knowing full well that it would otherwise be used against us. You think the left will have the same composure? Not likely. This is why some real consequences need to happen. If it doesn't there is every possibility the right will say screw it - no holds barred, we have nothing left to lose and spiral down to the left's level, especially in light of us currently holding the reins of power. But never doubt the Repub's ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

That said, there will be some kind of risk assessment in terms of the path forward.

I wonder what organic impacts (if any) this will have to further weaken the dem party. Reduced registration, donor money, etc. Sure there will always be rabid loyalists that will deny, but there will also be centrists (like Tulsi) that will turn their backs.

Until there are indictments, that is also something to watch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top